[gnso-rpm-wg] [Ext] Re: FOR REVIEW: Revised Questions to URS Practitioners - Please Comment by Tuesday, 24 April

[Julie Hedlund]

George,

Thank you for your comments.  With respect to your first question, the questionnaire will be rendered into a survey using SurveyMonkey and, as you suggest, the footnotes will be included as text that will be directly below the relevant question.

Staff will defer to the WG members with respect to your second question.

Kind regards,
Julie

On 4/19/18, 5:36 PM, "George Kirikos" <icann at leap.com> wrote:

    Just a quick comment with regards to footnotes (e.g. page 5), is it
    intended that this will be sent out to the practitioners as a PDF,
    that they'll respond in some non-standard manner? Or will it be turned
    into an online survey (e.g. SurveyMonkey, etc.) that they can fill
    out? If it's the latter, then you'll want to shift those footnotes
    into text that's directly below the relevant question.
    
    Also, on page 5, question 3, shouldn't there be something with regards
    to the response fees, appeal fees and/or other fees, instead of just
    filing fees by complainants? For example, at NAF, the types of fees
    are on page 9 of their supplemental rules:
    
    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_resources_URS_URS-2520Supplemental-2520Rules.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=7XyDVej8FbApHnlHFhF-bczgHJcNzFJVE-eDMwvsBk4&s=5c7_JzykRI36AwKhzt25MW7mEMNTEXjTpTdPaisVleA&e=
    
    Sincerely,
    
    George Kirikos
    416-588-0269
    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=7XyDVej8FbApHnlHFhF-bczgHJcNzFJVE-eDMwvsBk4&s=FNWub2QuBcyUGtVEtDOkjejdKTKUdYg81P8mQQR6ejM&e=
    
    
    
    On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
    > Dear All,
    >
    >
    >
    > Please see the attached revised document “URS Practitioner Background
    > Experience and Perspective” based on the comments and suggestions received
    > during the RPM PDP WG meeting today, 18 April.  Please review the document
    > per the following action item highlighted below.  The suggested edits are
    > indicated by redline and strikethrough in the attached document.
    >
    >
    >
    > Questions for URS Practitioners:
    >
    > Staff will provide to the WG a redlined document with suggested revisions by
    > 18 April (DONE-Attached)
    > WG members are encouraged to provide any further comments/suggestions by COB
    > Friday, 20 April, but not later than Tuesday, 24 April;
    > Staff will provide to the WG a final redlined document before the meeting on
    > Wednesday, 25 April.
    >
    >
    >
    > Please note:
    >
    > When the proposed questions are finalized, staff will proofread and correct
    > typos, formatting errors, etc. before the questions are converted into a
    > survey; WG members are encouraged to focus your comments/suggestions on the
    > substance.
    > Only the PDF version is provided to ensure the WG is commenting/suggesting
    > edits to the content in one master document, so as to avoid any potential
    > version confusion caused by Word file(s).
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your time and review!
    >
    >
    >
    > Best Regards,
    >
    > Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
    > gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
    
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180419/ae407fcb/smime.p7s>