[gnso-rpm-wg] Two URS decisions of note
Jon Nevett
jon at donuts.email
Wed Feb 7 17:02:07 UTC 2018
I wanted to point out two default cases between the same complainant and respondent relating to the same domain name that came our differently about 9 months apart.
I am not commenting on the substance or what it means (I assume that there will be differing interpretations), but just wanted to share them with the group.
1635446
boucheron.pub
Boucheron Holding SAS v. zhouhaotian et al.
URS
08/31/2015
Suspended
Default <http://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1635446D.htm>
09/15/2015
1676556
boucheron.pub
Boucheron Holding SAS v. zhouhaotian et al.
URS
05/25/2016
Claim Denied
Default <http://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1676556D.htm>
06/12/2016
Best,
Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180207/7d9b9187/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20180207/7d9b9187/signature.asc>
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg
mailing list