[GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposal re Q8.

[Paul Tattersfield]

Rebecca, I believe in 3.2.3 you should not add the words "as trademarks" as
the marks concerned are not trademarks. For example once such 6ter marks
are communicated to the USPTO and are accepted it is not possible for any
organization to register a trademark containing the mark and importantly
that includes the originating entity itself. Instead an 89 serial is
created so the mark turns up in an examining attorney’s search etc.

Best regards, Paul



On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:04 PM Tushnet, Rebecca <rtushnet at law.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> This is the same text but with the subject line proper.
>
>
> Rebecca Tushnet
> Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School
> 703 593 6759
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20191001/8897d9ef/attachment.html>