[GNSO-RPM-WG] Q#8

Wed Sep 18 14:44:04 UTC 2019

Thanks Rebecca. In that case I think it is important we do not change the
current wording of

3.2.4 - Other marks that constitute intellectual property.

It is an elegant catch all for all other type of marks not all other types
of IP. This includes any type of mark that is not included in 3.2.1, 3.2.2
& 3.2.3. GIs would seem to be a good example

The RPMs flow from 7.1. & 7.2 and they do not reference 3.2.4

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:25 PM Tushnet, Rebecca <rtushnet at law.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> My point exactly! We are wandering too far afield if we try and guess what
> might fit in an ancillary database.  "Marks" was Kathy's suggestion, which
> I'm fine with because it tracks with what plausibly might be in an
> ancillary database; I can also live with "IP" if we don't confuse the issue
> since it is not our job to determine what should be in an ancillary
> database.
>
>
> Rebecca Tushnet
> Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School
> 703 593 6759
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Paul Tattersfield <gpmgroup at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2019 10:22 AM
> *To:* Tushnet, Rebecca <rtushnet at law.harvard.edu>
> *Cc:* Scott Austin <SAustin at vlplawgroup.com>; Kathy Kleiman <
> kathy at kathykleiman.com>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Q#8
>
> Rebecca,
>
> Wouldn’t one normally suggest that there was a distinction between types
> of intellectual property such as trade secrets, marks, copyrights and
> patents etc? Or are you suggesting plant patents inter alia are types of
> marks? Thanks, Paul
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:57 PM Tushnet, Rebecca <rtushnet at law.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
>
> I want to caution against providing a definition of intellectual property
> since it's far beyond our remit and since things like trade secrets and
> patents should never be substantively eligible for the TMCH or any domain
> name registration process in the first place even though they are "IP": I
> am unable to think of how one could have a trade secret in a domain name,
> or a utility or design or plant patent, and we have no reason to speculate
> about it or generate confusion about it. Nor should we encourage copyright
> claims to be made on the kind of short phrases that make plausible
> registrations. Let's not go down this rabbit hole: if providers decide to
> make ancillary databases, they can.
>
> In terms of Scott's proposal, I can nonetheless live with the suggested
> change, though "strings" or "words" would be more neutral.
>
>
> Rebecca Tushnet
> Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School
> 703 593 6759
> ------------------------------
> *From:* GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Scott
> Austin <SAustin at vlplawgroup.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2019 9:46 AM
> *To:* Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Q#8
>
>
> Kathy:
>
> I tend to agree with John on the simplification but Rebecca does have a
> point on whether it is our role to suggest expanding the services of
> Deloitte. I don’t see the harm if it clarifies the process and provides an
> option for GI’s to obtain some form of protection.
>
> To that end I have suggested a minor change to your footnote in the
> attached markup as it appears we are trying to provide an option for
> inclusion of GI in a non Claims/Sunrise context. To what extent they
> benefit or a protection mechanism remains unclear to me for further
> development. Also if the comments at the end are intended to be included
> perhaps conform would be more fitting than percolate (but given the pace
> perhaps a geological term is more appropriate).
>
> In addition, is it the intention that footnote 1 in your text would become
> a defined term, as perhaps the draft should note that and locate it in the
> body of the TMCH standards where definitions are located.
>
> Claudio provided a list of intellectual property categories in his email
> that omitted copyright and I wondered if that was intentional as it relates
> to GI’s? We may want to add copyright to his intellectual property
> categories in his email (especially if patents and trade secrets are
> included) as those “other” registrations and rights have been used to
> protect commerce sometimes as an add on for DMCA purposes or in lieu of TM
> registrations where conflicts over words or regulatory prohibitions (e.g.
> cannabis) may force a creative alternative.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> *Please click below to schedule a call with me through my assistant for:*
>
> *  a 15-minute call
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__calendly.com_saustin2_15min&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=EJ70bZugCO7aZKkFhtCqTOxMMQcHQzQb3LZttKv3Frk&e=>
> * a 30-minute call
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__calendly.com_saustin2_30min&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=ZtqInww2ns572SfK1hG7yciGS73ocW3rVhFEWRq2ve8&e=>
> a 60-minute call
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__calendly.com_saustin2_60min&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=JETMq-i3HHQ19F7qGryYGq0WJnshy_D4J1eivQJMDQA&e=>
>
>
>
> *[image: IntellectualPropertyLaw 100]    **[image: microbadge[1]]*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avvo.com_attorneys_33308-2Dfl-2Dscott-2Daustin-2D1261914.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=9-kl1sjbaRIBt9TuHkF3-MGGuKivkQ3K9Y3gviWYoys&s=Dx-fsSH7li83S-KHMYWPrRn9H7jc30f1zoYfCyFauBc&e=>
>
>
> Scott R. Austin | Board Certified Intellectual Property Attorney | VLP Law
> Group LLP
>
> 101 NE Third Avenue, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
>
> Phone: (954) 204-3744 | Fax: (954) 320-0233 | SAustin at VLPLawGroup.com
>
>
>
> *From:* GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Kathy
> Kleiman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2019 10:52 AM
> *To:* gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [GNSO-RPM-WG] Q#8
>
>
>
> All,
>
> Last week we found considerable overlap and common ground on Q#8.  I
> promised to circulate language sharing that agreement and slightly refining
> existing proposals.
>
> Q#8:
>
> 3.2 The standards for inclusion in the Clearinghouse are:
>
> 3.2.1 Nationally or regionally registered word marks from all
> jurisdictions.
>
> 3.2.2 Any word mark that has been validated through a court of law or
> other judicial proceeding.
>
> 3.2.3 Any word marks specified in and protected by a statute or treaty *as
> trademarks *[1] in effect at the time the mark is submitted to the
> Clearinghouse for inclusion.
>
> 3.2.4 Other marks that constitute intellectual property.  [see below]
>
> 3.2.5 Protections afforded to trademark registrations do not extend to
> applications for registrations, marks.
>
> [1]  *By "trademarks," the WG means "trademarks, service marks,
> certification marks and collective marks."*
>
> For purposes of clarity, separate or ancillary databases of the Trademark
> Clearinghouse Provider (or another provider) may include other marks, but
> those databases should not be used for Sunrise or Trademark Claims Notices
> under the RPMs. Registries may use those separate or ancillary databases to
> provide additional services but are not required to do so under the RPMs.
>
> (Appropriate corresponding changes will be percolated across the *Trademark
> Clearinghouse* Applicant Guidebook)
>
> -----------------
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> This message contains information which may be confidential and legally
> privileged. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose
> to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you
> have received this message in error, please send me an email and delete
> this message. Any tax advice provided by VLP is for your use only and
> cannot be used to avoid tax penalties or for promotional or marketing
> purposes.
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=FqH22Wt-N1YkZuZ_Kyor6mGnVIEYtN1gJKItcIUYs7E&e=>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=tU5NtB9a3Td1KhPKNxh0ByCssKIyKZQHsct552-JMr8&e=>)
> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=E-M4OQvQBo8UWqE1LwEiDR3PcWlfM0I-0jiI1c4ous0&m=2IT88ja5IaG4rqCKPMaWmBIFI2JCSQF4pGki1K5XXRg&s=EziUsW0f0t0YWWDPwlseteTRlMGPh8dGdBFqTY_eYzU&e=>).
> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190918/4fb66012/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190918/4fb66012/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190918/4fb66012/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1901 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190918/4fb66012/image003-0001.jpg>