<div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000">Hi Mary & Others: Re: </font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">UDRP Review ~ Phase 2 ~ </span><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">January 2018.</span><div><font color="#000000"><br></font><div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000">Thank you for the email and attachment. I have but one (1) question, </font><font color="#ff0000"><b><u>relating to the Attachment</u></b>.</font></div><div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">If the </span><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">UDRP Review is going to begin as Phase 2, in </span><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">January 2018, </span><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">does that mean that our current WG Member, "SD"'s </span><font color="#000000" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">question / request of </font><font color="#000000">Monday, December 09, 2002 must remain un-asked formally & un-answered for ... </font><b><u><font color="#ff0000">ONLY 15 years & 11 months. ??</font></u></b></div><div><br></div><div>In all seriousness, icann tell you that's not "accountability" by any standard; and the NTIA needs to explain why, given ".COM" remains within their purview. </div><div><b><font color="#ff0000"><br></font></b></div><div><b><font color="#ff0000">FYI NTIA: If the United States wants Canada [and other Nations] to "ratify" the TPP, then ICANN needs to be "accountable;" b</font></b><b><font color="#ff0000">ecause, </font></b><font color="#ff0000"><b>Section 18, Article 18.28: Domain Names has ICANN as a "service provider" of sorts to the Government of Canada.</b></font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><u>SD's attachment of 2002, quote's:</u></div><div><u><br></u></div><div>"I'd like to alert the Task Force to a new issue that has been discussed within the BC concerning infringement problems arising in the .<a href="http://uk.com">uk.com</a>" and <i>"I would like to propose that the Task Force engage in further discussion on how the UDRP can potentially address this problem." which</i><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"> also states </span><i><font color="#000000">"</font>Currently, neither the UDRP nor Nominet provide any form of alternative dispute resolution for this extension, which has, not surprisingly, resulted in a host of new infringement problems for owners of well known marks."</i></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>These are questions that "GS" MUST ADDRESS quickly, given ".COM" Registrants are funding IPC working travel via ICANN's ".COM" revenue.</div></div><div><br></div><div>1. Why wouldn't a Verizon Attorney "know" that a ".COM" Domain Name purchased from Network Solutions, by a retail Client, being CentralNic, as a Domain Name Registrant, isn't, or wasn't then, subject to the ICANN RAA at Section 3.7.7.9?</div><div><i><br></i></div><div><i>2. </i>Why did this problem exist, after Network Solutions became aware of CentralNic's antics earlier?</div><div><br></div><div>History records Network Solutions FORMALLY making the discovery at WIPO's inquiry regarding: J C Bamford Excavators Limited, as Case No. D2001-1484.</div><div>> <font size="1"><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-1484.html">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-1484.html</a></font> < <br></div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps, ICANN's former IPC Member, "BW" can explain, having represented Network Solutions, from as far back as Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, having done work for them in 2004 can explain. [ ICANN Wiki says employed between <span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px">2002 - 2005 ] </span></div><div>> <font size="1"><a href="http://surftheboard.azurewebsites.net/SiteMap/Docs/ttabvue-76172057-EXT-24">http://surftheboard.azurewebsites.net/SiteMap/Docs/ttabvue-76172057-EXT-24</a></font> <</div><div> </div><div>3. Did CentralNic ~ <b>even then</b> ~ manage to confuse Verizon? As "Verizon" says: "<i>nor Nominet " </i>who by that time were well established, as what is now a ccNSO, ccTLD Registry for .UK.</div><div><br></div><div>Much less, as an American Corporation, why didn't they know then, that the well established Lanham Act had been revised / expanded as the ACPA, to include Domain Names of ".COM" where issues where under American Law? In Rem / In Personum.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>As history also records, the British Public were apprised of CentralNic's pursuit, as written about in The Guardian on September, 10th, 2000.</div><div>> <font size="1"><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2000/sep/10/money.efinance">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2000/sep/10/money.efinance</a></font> <<br></div><div><br></div><div>The members of the NTIA, emailed, should make themselves aware, that the article linked of Sepember, 10th, 2000, <b><u>PREDATES</u></b> the email attached of December 09, 2002; and worse still, it <b><u>PREDATES</u></b> when J C Bamford Excavators Limited were "<b>harmed</b>" by CentralNic, as the WIPO date lists the Case as being in the 2001 Files, per: <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;text-align:-webkit-center">Case No. D2001-1484.</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;text-align:-webkit-center"><br></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thank you all for You're collective attention, immediate discussion; and resolution of this long festering problem.</font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Regards,</font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Graham Schreiber.</font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>GNSO RPM WG MEMBER.</b></font></span></div><div><b><span style="text-align:-webkit-center"><font color="#000000" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">See SOI Link: </font></span><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Graham+Schreiber+SOI">https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Graham+Schreiber+SOI</a> </b></div><div><i><br></i></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Mary Wong <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>
<div>
<div>Dear all,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please find attached an initial draft Work Plan for Phase One of our PDP, for your review and discussion on the WG call scheduled for later today with WG Members. Please note that while the co-chairs have made initial comments on the draft, they may have
additional comments and observations that they will elaborate on during our upcoming call with WG Members. Of course, following the call, we will also update the draft as necessary to reflect changes and edits agreed on during the call. Further, as we move
along with the work in this Phase One, it is possible that additional changes – especially to the estimated timelines – will need to be made.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks and cheers</div>
<div>Mary</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Mary Wong</div>
<div>Senior Policy Director</div>
<div>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)</div>
<div>Email: <a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a></div>
<div>Telephone: <a href="tel:%2B1-603-5744889" value="+16035744889" target="_blank">+1-603-5744889</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>