<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">George,</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">I don’t see where anyone has directly addressed your points 2 or 3. As someone who regularly files UDRP cases and has a strong interest in the fairness of the process, I’d like to hear your thoughts
on the common causes for this problem. When I send demand letters or pre-filing copies of complaints to registrants I use the email address listed in the whois record. If the resolving website has a “Contact Us” page or form I’ll use that as well. In some
cases I’ve picked up the phone and tried calling registrants.</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">The few times I’ve heard from a registrant after they were formally served with the complaint they’ve said things like “I thought your message was spam”, “my privacy service never forwarded your
email to me”, or “your email got caught in my spam filter.”</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">Do you have any suggestions for improving pre-complaint communication with registrants, especially those who use privacy services? If I could get in touch with folks before filing a complaint
it could save my clients a bunch of money and even possibly lead to negotiated purchases of some accused domains, thus benefiting both sides.</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">Regards,</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">Steve</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">
</p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><img src="cid:52D5B2CC-E34D-4F64-9E81-94F42FEA419A" type="image/png"></p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 18px;">Steven M. Levy, Esq.</span></p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 18px;"><b>Accent Law Group, Inc.</b></span><br>
<font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri,sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">301 Fulton St.</span></font><br>
<font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri,sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">Philadelphia, PA 19147</span></font></p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">United States</p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">Phone: +1-215-327-9094<br>
Email: <a href="mailto:slevy@accentlawgroup.com" mce_href="mailto:slevy@accentlawgroup.com">slevy@AccentLawGroup.com</a></p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">Website: <a title="www.accentlawgroup.com" href="http://www.accentlawgroup.com/" mce_href="http://www.accentlawgroup.com" target="_blank">www.AccentLawGroup.com</a></p>
<p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-size: 13.600000381469727px;"><a title="www.accentlawgroup.com" href="http://www.accentlawgroup.com/" mce_href="http://www.accentlawgroup.com" target="_blank"></a>LinkedIn: <a title="www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/" mce_href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/</a> <br>
<span style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px;">________________________________________</span><br>
Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the
reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege.</p>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;">On 8/20/16, 10:04 AM, "<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> on behalf of George Kirikos" <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
on behalf of <a href="mailto:icann@leap.com">icann@leap.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<div style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px;"><br>
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="font-family: Consolas, monospace; font-size: 12px; border-left-color: rgb(181, 196, 223); border-left-width: 5px; border-left-style: solid; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">
<div>Hi Scott,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If there were greater safeguards to ensure that registrants were</div>
<div>*actually* properly served with the complaint, and had ample time to</div>
<div>retain counsel and prepare a response, that might be something to</div>
<div>consider.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>i.e. the 3 biggest reasons for a respondent default are:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. egregious cybersquatting, where the case is unwinnable (I'd call</div>
<div>this "active" default, since the respondent is making the active</div>
<div>choice to not defend the dispute),</div>
<div>2. they never received actual notice of the complaint, and</div>
<div>3. they received notice of the complaint, but couldn't prepare a</div>
<div>response in time</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If we can take care of #1, while properly protecting against</div>
<div>"inadvertent" defaults in scenarios #2 and #3 (i.e. prevent those from</div>
<div>being gamed by complainants), then my concerns would be reduced.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The panelists would still need to scrutinize the complaint's evidence</div>
<div>and arguments, though, and not simply accept it "blindly" (i.e.</div>
<div>evidence and arguments sufficient to pass the minimum pleading</div>
<div>requirements that would pass the UDRP's 3-part test; some complaints</div>
<div>are entirely deficient, so shouldn't be accepted if the other side</div>
<div>doesn't show up).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>George Kirikos</div>
<div>416-588-0269</div>
<div><a href="http://www.leap.com/">http://www.leap.com/</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Scott Austin <<a href="mailto:SAustin@vlplawgroup.com">SAustin@vlplawgroup.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div>Thank you George, excellent points. You may also want to consider adding a</div>
<div>true default rule (as in the courts and TTAB ) to that list to avoid</div>
<div>panelists becoming public defenders or engaging in judicial activism to</div>
<div>championv no-show respondents.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-------- Original Message --------</div>
<div>From: George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com">icann@leap.com</a>></div>
<div>Date: Sat, Aug 20, 2016, 9:19 AM</div>
<div>To: <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Questionable UDRPs & TM applications</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>To participate in a new gTLD sunrise period, a TMCH markholder must</div>
<div>submit a proof of use, see question/answer 2.2 through 2.4 of:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/faqs">https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/faqs</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The justification for that requirement was to prevent gaming. This</div>
<div>rule was established before sunrise periods even came about for new</div>
<div>gTLDs, as folks expected abuse if the proof of use requirement did not</div>
<div>exist (and they saw what happened in the .EU sunrise).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The same principle should apply to the UDRP, given the *actual* abuse</div>
<div>we're observing, as folks exploit gaping loopholes in the policy. In</div>
<div>the 1990s, the drafters of the UDRP either did not contemplate these</div>
<div>kinds of attacks, or did not appreciate the potential severity of the</div>
<div>problem. To not eliminate those loopholes would invite further abuse</div>
<div>of domain name registrants.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We're not at that disussion point yet, but when we get there I will</div>
<div>suggest going much further than simply using "proof of use" for</div>
<div>standing requirements of the UDRP. If there was an actual lawsuit,</div>
<div>it's almost a certainty that revenues generated by the trademarked</div>
<div>goods/services would need to be presented to the courts. If UDRP</div>
<div>complainants had to file audited financials relating to actual</div>
<div>revenues generated from their mark, that would go a long way to</div>
<div>eliminating abuse of the procedure by trademark trolls.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>George Kirikos</div>
<div>416-588-0269</div>
<div><a href="http://www.leap.com/">http://www.leap.com/</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Paul McGrady <<a href="mailto:policy@paulmcgrady.com">policy@paulmcgrady.com</a>></div>
<div>wrote:</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div>While I think this subject is several months premature, and I don’t want</div>
<div>to</div>
<div>wade in on the substance at this time, we should note that what is being</div>
<div>suggested here is that ICANN give preference to certain national trademark</div>
<div>regimes and disregard others. Tricky topic in ICANNland for sure,</div>
<div>especially these days.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best to all,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Paul D. McGrady, Jr.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="mailto:policy@paulmcgrady.com">policy@paulmcgrady.com</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From: <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]</div>
<div>On Behalf Of Edward Morris</div>
<div>Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 6:53 PM</div>
<div>To: Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cc: <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Questionable UDRPs & TM applications</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Excellent point, Phil.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On 20 Aug 2016, at 00:49, Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This suggests to me that all trademarks are not created equal, and that</div>
<div>when</div>
<div>we reach our UDRP work we may wish to address the issue of whether a</div>
<div>certain</div>
<div>quality of trademark should be required for filing a UDRP.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Virtualaw LLC</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1155 F Street, NW</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Suite 1050</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Washington, DC 20004</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>202-559-8597/Direct</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>202-559-8750/Fax</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>202-255-6172/Cell</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Twitter: @VlawDC</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From: <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]</div>
<div>On Behalf Of Emil</div>
<div>Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 5:44 PM</div>
<div>To: Paul Keating</div>
<div>Cc: <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Questionable UDRPs & TM applications</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Paul, thank you for appreciating my concern.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am very pleased to see that I can bring value in this exclusive</div>
<div>community</div>
<div>of professionals.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In the last 12 years I've seen a lot of cases where legitimate SMEs get</div>
<div>bullied with the "we'll get your domain" threat based on abusive TM</div>
<div>registrations, mostly postdating the domain name registration dates. In</div>
<div>some</div>
<div>cases I am very familiar with the patterns - as in how relatively</div>
<div>established website owners try to game the system - concrete ways.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is a major problem in certain countries of Europe (eastern block) and</div>
<div>outside Europe (countries like Tunisia let's say) where you can</div>
<div>theoretically register any trademark even if it is not necessarily</div>
<div>distinctive, special nor recognizable.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On 20 Aug 2016 00:15, Paul Keating <<a href="mailto:Paul@law.es">Paul@law.es</a>> wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This and comments such as George's should not be lost. These comments</div>
<div>need</div>
<div>to be retained and specifically addressed during the UDRP portion of the</div>
<div>WG.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From: <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Emil <<a href="mailto:emil@cv.ro">emil@cv.ro</a>></div>
<div>Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 4:30 PM</div>
<div>To: George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com">icann@leap.com</a>></div>
<div>Cc: <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>></div>
<div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Questionable UDRPs & TM applications</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>George, often TM registrations are granted on bogus or strange claims. For</div>
<div>example Christian Louboutin was granted a TM for red shoes outsole. By</div>
<div>this</div>
<div>logic BMW could be granted a TM for silver cars.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In the domain world:</div>
<div>There is a car rental company called economycarrentals.com. They tried to</div>
<div>obtain a TM at European level for "economy car rentals", a super generic</div>
<div>term used by thousands of rental agencies. Why? So that they can claim</div>
<div>economyrentacar.com and economyrentalcars.com in WIPO - the EMD of their</div>
<div>main competitor.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>They were refused (now twice) an EM Europe Wide trademark for lack of</div>
<div>distinctiveness but went on and tried at country level. A handfull of</div>
<div>countries allowed them to register a word (not figurative) trademark on</div>
<div>"economy car rentals" a dictionary super generic formulation. Now they</div>
<div>will</div>
<div>threaten & hussle with a WIPO arbitration all the local TLD owners for</div>
<div>those</div>
<div>particular countries.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Emil</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>________________________________</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No virus found in this message.</div>
<div>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com</div>
<div>Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4633/12811 - Release Date: 08/15/16</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>_______________________________________________</div>
<div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>_______________________________________________</div>
<div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></div>
</blockquote>
<div>_______________________________________________</div>
<div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This message contains information which may be confidential and legally</div>
<div>privileged. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose</div>
<div>to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you</div>
<div>have received this message in error, please send me an email and delete this</div>
<div>message. Any tax advice provided by VLP is for your use only and cannot be</div>
<div>used to avoid tax penalties or for promotional or marketing purposes.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>_______________________________________________</div>
<div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</div>
<div><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></div>
<div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>