<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi All, I tried to post
        this message last night. If anyone else is having problems
        posting to our list, please let me, J. Scott or Phil know. <br>
      </font></p>
    <p>------------------------------------------------<br>
    </p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Dear All, <br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">For those of us who go
        back to the beginning of time on these issues, I want to note
        how happy I am that our call for new participants has been
        answered. We have a number of new members on the Working Group,
        and they bring new questions, extensive backgrounds and
        expertise and new avenues of inquiry. We have the old guard who
        have worked on these issues for years. All are welcome and
        appreciated!</font></p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I also appreciate our
        dynamic discussion in and after the Working Group meeting today.
        We are working on the issue of what is within scope for our
        discussion of the Trademark Clearinghouse generally, and today,
        the Trademark Claims Services in particular. One of the
        questions that has been solidly placed before us (in different
        forms and different ways) is whether the current Rights
        Protection Mechanisms and the TMCH Services are fair and
        balanced. Do both trademark owners and nontrademark owners have
        appropriate and legal access to domain names?</font></p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Important questions
        were raised today about trademark rights and the limits of
        trademark rights. It is an inquiry that goes back to the Special
        Trademarks Initiative Group of the GNSO, if not before. It seems
        a very appropriate part of our inquiry to ask whether in a
        hypothetical .FORPRESIDENT New gTLD, we have a TMCH system that
        allows Clinton Watches, Clinton Fences and Clinton Printing
        Paper to register CLINTON.FORPRESIDENT before Secretary Hillary
        Clinton? <br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">When basic words of
        political discourse such as FREEDOM (USPTO IC 028 Mounts and
        mounting devices adapted for use with suspended physical fitness
        equipment. Reg No. 5042693), LIBERTY (USPTO IC 009 Hearing
        muffs, namely, sound amplifiers. Reg No. 4793635), and TRUST
        (USPTO IC 028. In-line skate liners. Reg No. 4301142) are used
        as trademarks, but also play an integral role in the fabric of
        political dialogue, we have a Free Expression issue and concern
        before us. <br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">That was our goal for
        today - not answers, but questions. I think we found some good
        ones...<br>
      </font></p>
    <font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Best, <br>
      Kathy<br>
      <br>
    </font>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/28/2016 3:07 PM, J. Scott Evans
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:D4116134.120DD%25jsevans@adobe.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div>
        <div>
          <div>Rebecca:</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>With regard to your last point, I believe we have a
            problem with nomenclature that has plagued this debate for
            17 years. To your last point, I believe you are speaking
            “dictionary terms” that, in certain instances, can also be
            generic terms. Apple for apples is a generic. Apple for
            apple juice is descriptive or perhaps suggestive. Apple for
            smartphones is arbitrary.  I do not believe that trademark
            owners should have the right to thwart criticism or protest
            or to prevent third parties with equally legitimate rights
            from using a string that may well be identical to a
            trademark, so long as the use in the domain is, in fact,
            non-infringing. What I worry about is the emotional argument
            and posturing about free speech in this debate. There seems
            to be a constant implied argument that trademark owners as a
            whole wish to squelch “internationally” recognized concepts
            of free speech. Yes, there are over aggressive trademark
            owners that seek to abuse the RPMs and trademark laws.
            Equally true, there a scurilous players in the DNS that seek
            to infringe the rights of trademark owners to the detriment
            of consumers. Our job is to try and find a balanced way of
            protecting both interests.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>J. Scott</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p style="margin: 0px;"><font color="#7f7f7f"><b><font
                      face="Helvetica">J. Scott Evans</font></b> <b><span
                      style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;">| </span><span
                      style="font-family: Helvetica;">Associate General
                      Counsel - Trademarks, Copyright, Domains &amp;
                      Marketing</span> <span style="font-family:
                      Helvetica, sans-serif;">|</span></b></font></p>
              <p style="margin: 0px;"><font face="Helvetica"
                  color="#ff0000"><b>Adobe </b></font></p>
              <p style="margin: 0px;"><font face="Helvetica"
                  color="#7f7f7f">345 Park Avenue<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"></span></font></p>
              <p style="margin: 0px;"><font face="Helvetica"
                  color="#7f7f7f">San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                  408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell)<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" style="color:
                    rgb(149, 79, 114);">jsevans@adobe.com</a></font></p>
              <p style="margin: 0px;"><font color="#7f7f7f"><font
                    face="Helvetica"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.adobe.c">www.adobe.c</a></font><span
                    style="font-family: Helvetica;">om</span></font></p>
            </div>
            <div><font color="#7f7f7f"><span style="font-family:
                  Helvetica;"><br>
                </span></font></div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
        <div style="font-family:Lucida Grande; font-size:11pt;
          text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
          BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
          0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
          BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
          <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Rebecca Tushnet
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:rlt26@law.georgetown.edu">rlt26@law.georgetown.edu</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday,
          September 28, 2016 at 11:39 AM<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"J. Scott Evans"
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com">jsevans@adobe.com</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>"
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>RE:
          [gnso-rpm-wg] "free speech"<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
          xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
          xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
          xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"
          xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
          <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
            medium)">
          <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
          <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Helvetica;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Helvetica;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Lucida Grande";
        panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.apple-tab-span
        {mso-style-name:apple-tab-span;}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle21
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.apple-converted-space
        {mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.cosearchterm
        {mso-style-name:co_searchterm;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
          <div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
            <div class="WordSection1">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                    font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                    125);">J. Scott, I don’t believe my statement holds
                    up US First Amendment law as the standard; let me
                    say again that freedom of speech, not the First
                    Amendment, is an internationally recognized value,
                    and that criticism of private businesses is
                    generally part of freedom of speech. FWIW, I don’t
                    recognize Wikipedia as authoritative either, though
                    the entry actually provides helpful external links
                    if you peruse it.<o:p></o:p></span></a></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);">Further resources on comparative freedom of
                  speech regimes include the very helpful overview at
                </span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1633231"><span
                    style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                    sans-serif;">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1633231</span></a><span
                  style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                  sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> and the many
                  sources cited therein (if any nonlawyers lack access
                  to the cited works, I may be able to help), as well as
                  Ronald
                </span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I7cb6ccefefd311e498db8b09b4f043e0/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv3%2Fsearch%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad6040a00000157720fabec289f3264%3FNav%3DANALYTICAL%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI7cb6ccefefd311e498db8b09b4f043e0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Search%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&amp;listSource=Search&amp;listPageSource=3b36d775a69aec3c8b89adc711488adc&amp;list=ANALYTICAL&amp;rank=8&amp;grading=na&amp;sessionScopeId=974384ae4bca6a686949f50a8f8ca2525f0f068a2ff02f65c47cc9b4335d4752&amp;originationContext=Search%20Result&amp;transitionType=SearchItem&amp;contextData=%28sc.Search%29#co_term_19621"><span
                    style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial,
                    sans-serif; color: rgb(102, 0, 102);
                    background-color: white; background-position:
                    initial initial; background-repeat: initial
                    initial;">Krotoszynski, Jr., The First Amendment in
                    Cross-Cultural Perspective:</span></a> A Comparative
                Legal Analysis of the Freedom of Speech (2006).<o:p></o:p></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);">Also, many jurisdictions don’t use the
                  terminology of “fair use,” but as far as I am aware
                  very few consider all criticism, or all unauthorized
                  use of a term, infringing; indeed, it would perhaps be
                  helpful, especially for the nonlawyers in the group,
                  to see the citations on which you are basing your
                  legal statements about the scope of trademark or
                  speech rights outside the US.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);">Finally, the problem we are facing is that
                  there is no neutral baseline here, and we have already
                  adopted substantial protections for trademark rights
                  claimants who have any recognized rights in <i>any</i>
                  relevant jurisdiction; we should recognize the variety
                  of freedom of speech interests the same as we
                  recognize the variety of trademark rights.  As Kathy
                  noted on the call, a significant number of the
                  relevant marks are generic for at least some things
                  and not universally famous, which increases the
                  breadth of rights protections far beyond actual
                  rights.
                  <o:p></o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                    font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                    125);">Rebecca Tushnet<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                    font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                    125);">Georgetown Law<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                    font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                    125);">703 593 6759<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                  font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
                  125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <div>
                <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
                  1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;
                        font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif;">From:</span></b><span
                      style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma,
                      sans-serif;"> J. Scott Evans [<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com">mailto:jsevans@adobe.com</a>]
                      <br>
                      <b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:20 PM<br>
                      <b>To:</b> Rebecca Tushnet<br>
                      <b>Cc:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                      <b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] "free speech"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;">Rebecca:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;">Thanks
                      for weighing in here. First, I do not use
                      Wikipedia as a definitive source for anything
                      related to the law. It is interesting reading and
                      may require that I go to more definitive sources
                      to verify, but I do not put much stock in it as
                      the absolute “truth” on any subject. Second, many
                      countries have almost an exact replica of the US
                      Constitution, but don’t recognize the provision
                      related to free speech. Likewise, many
                      jurisdictions do not recognize the concept of
                      “fair use.” My only point our call was that there
                      are many non-lawyers participating. I think many
                      time views are put forth on our calls that could
                      be seen as misleading. It is one thing to hold the
                      US concept of free speech up as the standard
                      bearer that we should aspire to in our work (I
                      could also argue that US concept of IP protection
                      should also be held up as an appropriate
                      standard). However, in my experiences at ICANN
                      since we originally drafted, it has constantly
                      been pointed out that we SHOULD NOT apply US-like
                      trademark protections to the ICANN RPMs since
                      different jurisdictions view trademarks
                      differently. I can theoretically see the rationale
                      behind this argument. Unfortunately for me,
                      however, I fail to see how the concept of US free
                      speech should be universally applied, but US-like
                      trademark protections should not. I think that is
                      intellectually inconsistent.  As for the UN’s
                      Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its
                      signatories, I think the same position could be
                      taken with regard to the Paris Convention and its
                      signatories. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;">J.
                      Scott<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
                          style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                          Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                          127);">J. Scott Evans</span></b><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                        sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127, 127);"> </span><b><span
                          style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                          Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                          127);">| Associate General Counsel -
                          Trademarks, Copyright, Domains &amp; Marketing</span></b><b><span
                          style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                          sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127, 127);"> </span></b><b><span
                          style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                          Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                          127);">|</span></b><span style="font-size:
                        10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color:
                        black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
                          style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                          Helvetica, sans-serif; color: red;">Adobe </span></b><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                        sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                        Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                        127);">345 Park Avenue</span><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                        sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                        Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                        127);">San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                        408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell)<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com"><span
                            style="color:#954F72">jsevans@adobe.com</span></a></span><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                        sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family:
                        Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(127, 127,
                        127);"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://www.adobe.com">www.adobe.com</a></span><span
                        style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial,
                        sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                        font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                      font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                    font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
                1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                      font-family: 'Lucida Grande', serif; color:
                      black;">From:
                    </span></b><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                    font-family: 'Lucida Grande', serif; color: black;">&lt;<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt;
                    on behalf of Rebecca Tushnet &lt;<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:rlt26@law.georgetown.edu">rlt26@law.georgetown.edu</a>&gt;<br>
                    <b>Date: </b>Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 10:34
                    AM<br>
                    <b>Cc: </b>"<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>"
                    &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    <b>Subject: </b>[gnso-rpm-wg] "free speech"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                    font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                      font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                      73, 125);">Just to correct a misstatement on the
                      call earlier:  Most nations don’t have a US-style
                      First Amendment.  Most nations with a rule of law
                      do, however, recognize freedom of speech in some
                      form, including the right to criticize private
                      companies.  As this Wikipedia entry notes,
                    </span><span style="color:black"><a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country"><span
                          style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                          sans-serif;">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country</span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                      sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">,
                      implementation can be inconsistent on the ground,
                      but I expect that inconsistent enforcement of
                      trademark rights on the ground doesn’t mean that
                      trademark owners want ICANN to ignore the law on
                      the books; freedom of speech is equally a
                      principle worth honoring.  In addition, I don’t
                      know how many countries whose nationals
                      participate in the ICANN process have signed on to
                      the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which
                      includes freedom of speech,
                    </span><span style="color:black"><a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/"><span
                          style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                          sans-serif;">http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/</span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
                      sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">, but I
                      doubt we want to make policy based on the
                      countries that don’t recognize any freedom of
                      speech at all.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                      font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                      73, 125);"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                      font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                      73, 125);">Also, you can’t have it both ways: if
                      domain names can facilitate infringement, which
                      they absolutely can, then they convey meaning; if
                      they convey meaning, they can also facilitate
                      noninfringing conduct or affirmatively protected
                      freedom of speech.  It is just as true, or untrue,
                      that a trademark owner can register a different
                      string if it can’t have the one that it wants as
                      it is that a person making fair or otherwise
                      noninfringing use can do so.  This is especially
                      so if we’ve given trademark owners the ability to
                      jump the line in many circumstances.  Freedom of
                      speech principles may help tell us when preclusion
                      of a domain name to a speaker—whether a trademark
                      owner or a non-owner—is of particular importance. 
                      That is, they can help us identify the important
                      false positives (notifications generated in
                      response to domain names that wouldn’t infringe).</span><span
                      style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                      font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                      73, 125);"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                        font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                        73, 125);">Rebecca Tushnet</span><span
                        style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                        font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                        73, 125);">Georgetown Law</span><span
                        style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
                        font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31,
                        73, 125);">703 593 6759</span><span
                        style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid
                    #B5C4DF 4.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:
                          10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;
                          color: black;"> </span><span
                          style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                  font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
                align="center"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                  font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;">
                  <hr align="center" size="3" width="100%">
                </span></div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
                  font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: gray;"><br>
                  &lt;ACL&gt;</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;
                  font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </span>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>