<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>I think as we evaluate resending the survey, we should also
      reflect that our time on the TM-PDDRP is largely past. Our work
      plan has us moving on to 6 months of TMCH and many more months
      (maybe years) of URS and UDRP. <br>
    </p>
    <p>If the goal was to see if there was anything missing in our
      analysis of the TM-PDDRP, there was a wide array of community
      members who did respond - small as it may be.</p>
    <p>I am always in favor of educational efforts, but that sounds like
      a recommendation to me.</p>
    <p>Best, Kathy<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/19/2016 9:51 AM, Petter Rindforth
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:1476885083296.112943.17542@webmail11"
      type="cite">
      <div>Steve,<br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Good point. <br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Perhaps we can rephrase the questioins so that those that
        replies but have never heard about the system just have to click
        that box and then - if they want - as the next and (for them)
        final step are free to make a comment.<br>
      </div>
      <div>I still think that we such way can get some useful inputs
        like "Ohhh, never heard about it, but it may well be useful of
        you just cangem/add, etc..."</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Best,<br>
      </div>
      <div>Petter</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">-- </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Petter Rindforth, LL M </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Fenix Legal KB </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Stureplan 4c, 4tr </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">114 35 Stockholm </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Sweden </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">E-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu">petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">NOTICE </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">This e-mail message is intended solely for
              the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It
              may contain confidential attorney-client privileged
              information and attorney work product. If the reader of
              this message is not the intended recipient, you are
              requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the
              information it contains. Please delete it immediately and
              notify us by return e-mail. </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><span class="highlight" style="background-color: rgb(255,
          255, 255);"><span class="colour" style="color: rgb(51, 51,
            51);"><span class="font" style="font-family: &quot;Open
              Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial,
              sans-serif;">Thank you</span></span></span><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>19 oktober 2016 15:22:44 +02:00, skrev Steve Levy
        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:slevy@accentlawgroup.com">&lt;slevy@accentlawgroup.com&gt;</a>:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div class="oneComWebmail-html oneComWebmail-mail">
          <div style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
            class="oneComWebmail-body">
            <div>
              <div>
                <p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">As to Petter’s
                  point, I see the lack of knowledge of the PDDRP as a
                  valuable statistic (i.e, understanding the scope so
                  that perhaps further outreach and education efforts
                  can be planned).  However, I’m wondering what value
                  we’re expecting from asking those who’ve never heard
                  of the Policy to comment upon it or answer any other
                  questions in the survey.  How can one provide any
                  reliable or helpful comments or question responses on
                  a topic of which they have no knowledge?<br>
                </p>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Regards,<br>
              </div>
              <div>Steve<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><img
                    src="cid:part1.D74B61E1.102ED6F1@kathykleiman.com"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><span class="size"
                    style="font-size: 18px;">Steven M. Levy, Esq.</span><br>
                </p>
                <div><span class="size" style="font-size: 18px;"><b>Accent
                      Law Group, Inc.</b></span><br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <span class="font" style="font-family:
                    Calibri,sans-serif;"><span class="size"
                      style="font-size: 13.6px;">301 Fulton St.</span></span><br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <span class="font" style="font-family:
                    Calibri,sans-serif;"><span class="size"
                      style="font-size: 13.6px;">Philadelphia, PA 19147</span></span><br>
                </div>
                <p style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px; padding: 0px;
                  margin: 0px;">United States<br>
                </p>
                <div>Phone: +1-215-327-9094<br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  Email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:slevy@accentlawgroup.com"
                    target="_blank">slevy@AccentLawGroup.com</a><br>
                </div>
                <p style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px; padding: 0px;
                  margin: 0px;">Website: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://www.accentlawgroup.com/"
                    target="_blank">www.AccentLawGroup.com</a><br>
                </p>
                <p style="font-size: 13.600000381469727px; padding: 0px;
                  margin: 0px;">LinkedIn: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/"
                    target="_blank">www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/</a> <br>
                </p>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>On 10/19/16, 8:39 AM, "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> on
              behalf of Paul Keating" &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> on
              behalf of
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:paul@law.es"
                target="_blank">paul@law.es</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <blockquote
              id="oneComWebmail-MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE"
              style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING: 0 0 0 5;
              MARGIN: 0 0 0 5;">
              <div>When we send it out the email should explain that we
                need responses. <br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Regarding use of the sample yes I agree all
                information is good. However we really cannot rely upon
                it for statistical purposes and should note that in our
                report.
                <br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Sincerely,<br>
              </div>
              <div>Paul Keating, Esq.<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <blockquote
                id="oneComWebmail-MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE"
                style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING: 0 0 0 5;
                MARGIN: 0 0 0 5;">
                <div>On Oct 19, 2016, at 1:52 PM, gtheo &lt;<a
                    moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl"
                    target="_blank">gtheo@xs4all.nl</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Agreed, if the sample size is too small, we should
                  send it again.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>As mentioned before, usually the response rate is
                  rather low when it comes to these survey's, this has
                  never stopped us to take the results into account in
                  previous exercises.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Regards,<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Theo Geurts | Compliance &amp; Policy Officer<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Realtime Register B.V.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Ceintuurbaan 32A<br>
                </div>
                <div>8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>T: +31.384530759<br>
                </div>
                <div>F: +31.384524734<br>
                </div>
                <div>U: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.realtimeregister.com">www.realtimeregister.com</a><br>
                </div>
                <div>E: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:legal@realtimeregister.com"
                    target="_blank">legal@realtimeregister.com</a><br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Petter Rindforth schreef op 2016-10-19 09:57 AM:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote
                  id="oneComWebmail-MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE"
                  style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING: 0 0 0 5;
                  MARGIN: 0 0 0 5;">
                  <div>Agree.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Let's try to send it out again, and maybe this
                    time especially add<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>that we appreciate to get comments even if the
                    TM-PDDRP has never been<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>considered or is totally unknown.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>I sent a reminder to a couple of IP attorney
                    groups, and got a<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>response back from a number of members that they
                    had never heard about<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>the TM-PDDRP and therefore saw no reason to reply
                    to the Survey.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Best,<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Petter<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>--<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Petter Rindforth, LL M<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Fenix Legal KB<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Stureplan 4c, 4tr<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>114 35 Stockholm<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Sweden<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Fax: +46(0)8-4631010<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>E-mail: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu"
                      target="_blank">petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>NOTICE<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This e-mail message is intended solely for the
                    individual or<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>individuals to whom it is addressed. It may
                    contain confidential<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>attorney-client privileged information and
                    attorney work product. If<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>the reader of this message is not the intended
                    recipient, you are<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>requested not to read, copy or distribute it or
                    any of the information<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>it contains. Please delete it immediately and
                    notify us by return<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>e-mail.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Thank you<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>18 oktober 2016 15:45:45 +02:00, skrev Thomas,
                    Christopher M.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:christhomas@parkerpoe.com"
                      target="_blank">christhomas@parkerpoe.com</a>&gt;:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote
                    id="oneComWebmail-MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE"
                    style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING: 0 0 0
                    5; MARGIN: 0 0 0 5;">
                    <div>I agree with Renee. And if we do not get a
                      significant response, I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>think we need to make a determination on the
                      data that we have.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Thanks,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Chris<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>_______________________________<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Christopher Thomas<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Partner<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Parker Poe<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>PNC Plaza | 301 Fayetteville Street | Suite
                      1400 | Raleigh, NC 27601<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Office: 919.835.4641 | Fax: 919.834.4564<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Visit our website at<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.parkerpoe.com">www.parkerpoe.com</a> [1]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>-----Original Message-----<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
                      On Behalf Of Reuter, Renee M<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:24 AM<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: J. Scott Evans; George Kirikos<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Cc: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I think it would be unfair to those who took
                      the time to send in<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>responses for us to ignore the survey results.
                      I would be in favor<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>of recirculating the survey.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Renee<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>-----Original Message-----<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
                      On Behalf Of J. Scott Evans<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:22 AM<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: George Kirikos<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Cc: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Query to our group. If the majority feels the
                      sample size is just<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>too small, what should we do? Ask for
                      additional input by<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>recirculating the survey. Taking George's
                      points and ignore the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>survey b/c the sample is too small? Do other
                      have another<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>alternative?<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott Evans | Associate General Counsel -
                      Trademarks, Copyright,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Domains &amp; Marketing | Adobe<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>345 Park Avenue<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell)<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.adobe.com">www.adobe.com</a> [2]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On 10/18/16, 6:18 AM, "George Kirikos" &lt;<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>&gt;
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Your first email asked for "Thoughts?" and
                      "Discussion"? Then, after<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>receiving my thoughts and discussion on the
                      survey, you attempted to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>delegitimize those thoughts and discussion by
                      saying what you said:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-October/000685.html"
                        target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-October/000685.html</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>"I am not going to argue statistics with you.
                      You can say whatever<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>you<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>want to discredit this input. We asked for
                      input. We received it and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>it<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>gave us a clear direction. Just because the
                      direction is in<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>direction<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>opposition to your personal position is no
                      reason to ignore the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>input.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I would suggest that you rally those who share
                      your views the next<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>time<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>we do outreach."<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>with the entire basis of that statement ("Just
                      because...") based on<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>a<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>false premise that I'm against changing the
                      PDDRP. A false premise.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>simply pointed out simple truths, a total
                      sample size of only 16,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>with<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>only 5 in favour of PDDRP changes. If those
                      observations were so<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>"dangerous" that you "couldn't argue
                      statistics", but instead sought<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>attack the person making them, that says a lot
                      about the strength of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>your arguments.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>And then you made the reckless suggestion that
                      folks should be<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>attempting to artificially affect the outcome
                      of the PDP by<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>"rallying"<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>people who "share your views".<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I don't have any "anti-IP animus" --- I've long
                      been opposed to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>cybersquatting! I've even assisted TM holders
                      pursue cybersquatters.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>am against *over-reaching* by some TM holders
                      and am in favour of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>*balanced* policy that protects the interests
                      of domain name<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>registrants, in accordance with established
                      law.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Stop trying to label people, and instead listen
                      to the arguments and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>facts they put forward.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Here were the undeniable FACTS: 16 total
                      response, 5 in favour of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>changes.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>In my view, as I said before, the sample size
                      is too small, and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>there<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>were flaws in the survey where the numbers
                      didn't add up properly.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sincerely,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George Kirikos<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>416-588-0269<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.leap.com/" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:47 AM, J. Scott Evans
                      &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I apologize if you feel attacked. That was not
                      my intent. It was,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>however, my intent to point out that our group
                      reached out to the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>community for feedback. We got that feedback
                      and it gave us a<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>directive. If we applied your same argument, I
                      could say that the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>anti-IP sentiments of the NCUC have been
                      championed for over 18<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>years<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>by no more than 10 people who claim to
                      represent all non-contracted,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>non-commercial parties. That said, and despite
                      only seeing the same<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>voices raise the same concerns time and time
                      again, we have<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>listened,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>debated, re-debated, and sought input. The
                      issues/concerns of these<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>parties are always on the table despite only
                      being put there by a<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>very small group of people. So, I think we
                      should take into account<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>the call for change in the PDDRP and take
                      action.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Others<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>may disagree and our consensus may be that we
                      should not take<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>action.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Finally, I follow your work in many working
                      groups and, IMHO, you<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>have a clear anti-IP animus and I do believe
                      that flavors your<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>positions. I may be wrong, but I am entitled to
                      my opinion and I can<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>express it. It is not meant to insult you or
                      demean your positions.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>It is meant to call a spade a spade. I am
                      pro-IP and proud of it. I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>will advocate for trademark owners when not
                      acting in my capacity of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>chair. As Chair, it is my duty to make sure ALL
                      viewpoints are heard<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>and considered, even those with which I
                      strongly disagree.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott Evans | Associate General Counsel -
                      Trademarks, Copyright,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Domains &amp; Marketing | Adobe<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>345 Park Avenue<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell) <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.adobe.com">www.adobe.com</a> [2]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On 10/18/16, 5:36 AM, "<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
                      on behalf of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George Kirikos" &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
                      on behalf of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>What are you talking about? I've already made
                      it clear (during the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>calls) that I'm in *favour* of improving the
                      PDDRP! Perhaps you've<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>not been paying attention. For you to attack my
                      earlier response on<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>the basis that the "input" is in "opposition to
                      (my) personal<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>position" is ridiculous. I would have made the
                      comments I made<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>regardless of my own position, for the clear
                      and logical reasons I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>stated, which had absolutely nothing to do with
                      the actual answers<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>the survey but instead were based on (1) total
                      number of responses<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>and (2) numbers not adding up properly.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Furthermore, to suggest that *anyone* in the
                      group should "rally<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>those who share your views the next time" is
                      entirely inappropriate,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>in my opinion. It's suggesting that instead of
                      this working group<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>doing a "scientific" survey, a *representative*
                      sample of the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>population of stakeholders, that folks should
                      instead be engaged in<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>electioneering in order to artificially
                      manipulate the outcome. For<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>that suggestion to come from one of the
                      co-chairs of this working<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>group is even more disturbing.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Lastly, I properly noted that there were a
                      total of 5 people (out of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>16 survey participants) believe that the PDDRP
                      should change. That's<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>31.25%, a mathematical fact. You might label
                      that an "overwhelming"<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>response and a "clear direction", but I
                      disagree, for the reasons I<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>stated in my first email, and say so *despite*
                      my own personal<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>opinion on the issue.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sincerely,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George Kirikos<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>416-588-0269<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.leap.com/" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:13 AM, J. Scott Evans
                      &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I am not going to argue statistics with you.
                      You can say whatever<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>you want to discredit this input. We asked for
                      input. We received<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>it and it gave us a clear direction. Just
                      because the direction is<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>in direction opposition to your personal
                      position is no reason to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>ignore the input. I would suggest that you
                      rally those who share<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>your views the next time we do outreach.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott Evans | Associate General Counsel -
                      Trademarks, Copyright,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Domains &amp; Marketing | Adobe<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>345 Park Avenue<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell) <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.adobe.com">www.adobe.com</a> [2]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On 10/18/16, 5:08 AM, "<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
                      on behalf of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George Kirikos" &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
                      on behalf of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>1. The sample size appears to be 16 (from Q2),
                      so the statistical<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>margin of error for such a small sample size is
                      enormous. The total<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>number of respondents who "overwhelmingly"
                      believe that the PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>should change is 5 (answer to Q10), which is
                      actually 31.25% of<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>those who participated in the survey (5 of 16).<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>2. Many of the numbers don't add up. e.g.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>(a) for Q4, there were 19 responses, despite
                      the sample size being<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>16!<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>(b) for Q9, there were 6 responses, when the
                      most there should have<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>been is 5 (given there were 5 "yes" responses
                      in Q7).<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>(c) for Q10, there were 6 responses, when the
                      most there should<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>have been is 5 (given there were 5 "no"
                      responses in Q9).<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>There were only 9 visible answers (i.e. there
                      was no Q1 shown in<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>the document), so it's disturbing that
                      one-third of the survey<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>results don't add up properly. I'm not sure
                      what software was used<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>to display the survey, but tools like
                      SurveyMonkey, etc. usually<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>allow "conditional branching" or "skip logic"
                      to only show some<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>questions to people who answer a prior question
                      in a certain manner,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>etc.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/tour/skiplogic/"
                        target="_blank">https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/tour/skiplogic/</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Given the above, I'd place little weight on the
                      results, either<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>"for"<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>something or "against" something.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sincerely,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>George Kirikos<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>416-588-0269<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.leap.com/" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:56 AM, J. Scott Evans
                      &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Wow. The respondents seem to really believe
                      (overwhelmingly so)<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>that we need to amend the PDDRP to make is
                      useable.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Thoughts? Discussion?<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>J. Scott Evans | Associate General Counsel -
                      Trademarks,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Copyright, Domains &amp; Marketing |<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Adobe<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>345 Park Avenue<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>San Jose, CA 95110<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell) <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jsevans@adobe.com" target="_blank">jsevans@adobe.com</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.adobe.com">www.adobe.com</a> [2]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>&gt;
                      on behalf of David Tait<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:david.tait@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">david.tait@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 2:36 AM<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>" &lt;<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Dear All<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Further to my previous email I attach a further
                      revised version<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>of this document which (following a request
                      from the co-chairs)<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>now contains the graphs once again.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Kind regards,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>David<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: David Tait &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:david.tait@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">david.tait@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Date: Friday, 14 October 2016 at 15:08<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Cc: Mary Wong &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Dear Jeff<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Further to your previous email I am pleased to
                      attach a<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>consolidated version of the responses received.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Kind regards,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>David<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: Jeff Neuman &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com"
                        target="_blank">jeff.neuman@comlaude.com</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Date: Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 11:09<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: Mary Wong &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a>&gt;, "<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>"<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: RE: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Thanks Mary for this. Is there a way to combine
                      all of the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>written responses in the summary document as
                      well especially to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>questions 6, 7, 8, 10.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Jeffrey J. Neuman<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Senior Vice President |Valideus USA| Com Laude
                      USA<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Mclean, VA 22102, United States<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>E: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jeff.neuman@valideus.com"
                        target="_blank">jeff.neuman@valideus.com</a> or
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com"
                        target="_blank">jeff.neuman@comlaude.com</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>T: +1.703.635.7514<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>M: +1.202.549.5079<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>@Jintlaw<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>On Behalf Of Mary Wong<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 3:49 PM<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW &amp;
                      DISCUSSION: Provider and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Dear all,<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>You will recall that the Working Group had
                      agreed to resume<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>deliberations over the Trademark
                      Post-Delegation Dispute<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Resolution Procedure<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>(TM-PDDRP)<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>after receipt of responses from the TM-PDDRP
                      providers and<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>closure of the Community Survey.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>We received responses from two providers ­
                      FORUM and WIPO, for<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>which we thank Brian Beckham, Ty Gray, Daniel
                      Legerski and their<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>colleagues.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>We<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>also<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>collected sixteen community member responses to
                      the TM-PDDRP<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Community Survey, including from registrars and
                      intellectual<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>property rights-holders.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>All the responses, as well as an aggregated
                      data report on the<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Community Survey, have now been uploaded to the
                      Working Group<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>wiki space here:<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://community.icann.org/x/ugqsAw[community.icann.org]"
                        target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/ugqsAw[community.icann.org]</a>.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>The Working Group co-chairs have asked that
                      Working Group members<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>review these responses in time for our next
                      call on 19 October<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>2016, where, if time permits, we will start
                      discussing them. At<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>the moment, we anticipate that a fuller review,
                      including<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>community participation, will be the focus of
                      the Working Group¹s<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>open meeting at ICANN57 in Hyderabad. This will
                      allow us to<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>complete this initial review of the TM-PDDRP
                      shortly thereafter.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>FYI the tentative date and time of the open
                      Working Group meeting<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>at<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>ICANN57<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>is currently Monday 7 November (Day 5 of the
                      meeting), from<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>11.00-12.30<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>local Hyderabad time. As with all these
                      sessions, remote<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>participation facilities will be made available
                      for those who<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>will not be present in Hyderabad.<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Thanks and cheers<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Mary<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Mary Wong<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Senior Policy Director<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
                      Numbers (ICANN)<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Telephone: +1-603-5744889<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>________________________________<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>&lt;ACL&gt;<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                        target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                    </div>
                    <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                        target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                        target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files
                    transmitted with it<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>are intended solely for the use of the individual
                    or entity to whom<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>they are addressed and may contain confidential
                    and privileged<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>information protected by law. If you received
                    this e-mail in error,<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or
                    copying of the e-mail<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
                    immediately by return<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>e-mail and delete all copies from your system.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic
                    message and any<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>attachments are confidential property of the
                    sender. The information<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>is intended only or the use of the person to whom
                    it was addressed.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Any other interception, copying, accessing, or
                    disclosure of this<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>message is prohibited. The sender takes no
                    responsibility for any<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>unauthorized reliance on this message. If you
                    have received this<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>message in error, please immediately notify the
                    sender and purge the<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>message you received. Do not forward this message
                    without permission.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>[ppab_p&amp;c]<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Links:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>------<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>[1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.parkerpoe.com" target="_blank">http://www.parkerpoe.com</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>[2] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.adobe.com" target="_blank">http://www.adobe.com</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                  </div>
                  <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>_______________________________________________<br>
                </div>
                <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
                </div>
                <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
                </div>
                <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                    target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div>_______________________________________________<br>
              </div>
              <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
              </div>
              <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
              </div>
              <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg"
                  target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="oneComWebmail-mail">
          <div class="oneComWebmail-body">
            <div>_______________________________________________<br>
            </div>
            <div>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
            </div>
            <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
            </div>
            <div><a moz-do-not-send="true" target="_blank"
                href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>