<div><div dir="auto">Paul,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks for your response.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Just to clarify, the question is: how many Sunrise registrations are needed to justify having the mechanism in place? (See the subject line of this note)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This question was presented in light of the proposition that we are seeing an insufficient number of Sunrise registrations per TLD. So if you think the answer is zero then we've met the threshold.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or are you answering a different question? On that basis, may I inquire which question you are answering?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto">Claudio</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:24 PM Paul Keating <<a href="mailto:paul@law.es">paul@law.es</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Ill bite here. </div><div id="m_-3876207591809904084AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="m_-3876207591809904084AppleMailSignature">Answer: 0 (zero). Sunrise is not fit for its original purpose. Few legitimate trademarks are being submitted. There is evidence of abuse in sunrise registrations. More importantly, the notice process seems more than sufficient to address the legitimate concerns.<br><br>Sent from my iPad</div></div><div dir="auto"><div><br>On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:25, claudio di gangi <<a href="mailto:ipcdigangi@gmail.com" target="_blank">ipcdigangi@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><div dir="auto">George,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I'm going to use an extreme example to illustrate my point.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If 1,000,000 new gTLDs are launched in the next round, how many Sunrise registrations do think there should be order to reach the "success" threshold?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best,</div><div dir="auto">Claudio</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:50 PM George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi again,<br>
<br>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:44 PM, George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>with stats propped up with high counts of sub-$1<br>
> registrations, or even domains that are stuffed into the accounts of<br>
> registrants of other TLDs (e.g. .xxx with NSI, or .kiwi).<br>
<br>
Sorry, that was a typo. It should have been .XYZ with NSI, of course,<br>
not .XXX, e.g.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140605.htm" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140605.htm</a><br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
<br>
George Kirikos<br>
416-588-0269<br>
<a href="http://www.leap.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></span></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div>