<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">George:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I remember Jeremy describing the paper. I was referring to the email chain you started entitled on the heels of that paper, " <font face="Helvetica Neue" class=""><font color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.85098)" class="">99%+ reduction in sunrise utilization rate per TLD supports EFF call for elimination of sunrise,” that, to me, </font><font color="#000085" class="">established</font><font color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.85098)" class=""> a link between your arguments and the paper. </font></font><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><font color="#000085" face="Helvetica Neue" class="">Kurt</font></div><div class=""><div class=""><font color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.85098)" face="Helvetica Neue" class=""><br class=""></font><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:46 AM, George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" class="">icann@leap.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Hi Kurt,<br class=""><br class="">On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Kurt Pritz <<a href="mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com" class="">kurt@kjpritz.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">"1) George refers to the EFF and in past emails has particularly<br class="">referred to the EFF white paper, "Which Internet registries offer the<br class="">best protection for domain owners?” as justification for eliminated<br class="">the Sunrise RPM.....Yet, because it is “published," this is the source<br class="">cited often on this list as authority for eliminating Sunrise."<br class=""><br class="">I don't recall ever referencing that particular paper in this working<br class="">group. I advocated elimination of the Sunrise RPM long before that<br class="">paper was even published. That paper only came out in late July:<br class=""><br class=""><a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-July/002256.html" class="">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-July/002256.html</a><br class=""><br class="">and as per the archives, no one ever replied to that thread. I've<br class="">searched past emails, and can't find myself referencing it all here.<br class=""><br class="">My reasoning for elimination of sunrise isn't based at all on that<br class="">study, especially since the reasoning predated that study.<br class=""><br class="">Not only has it not been "cited often", it's unclear anyone but Jeremy<br class="">has even mentioned it.<br class=""><br class="">If you have a link to me (or anyone else for that matter) referencing<br class="">that paper on this PDP mailing list, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, I<br class="">think you should correct your statement.<br class=""><br class="">Sincerely,<br class=""><br class="">George Kirikos<br class="">416-588-0269<br class="">http://www.leap.com/<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></div></body></html>