<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Jonathan,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the clarification.</div><div><br></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>when a party prevails in a URS case, the domain is locked for the life of the domain registration: "Immediately upon receipt of the Determination, the Registry Operator shall suspend the domain name, <u>which shall remain suspended for the balance of the registration period</u> and would not resolve to the original web site. "</span></div><div><br></div><div>This raises the issue of the disparity when a domain is only registered for a 1-yr period or longer. I would presume most domains subject to a URS are short-term (1-yr registration).</div><div><br></div><div>In any case the registrar has received the registration fee it bargained for. It was aware of the URS/UDRP enforcement mechanisms at the time of registration. It could have imposed a fee or charged a higher price. If it chose not to do so then such is life. Either way i see no reason to now transfer the costs to someone else. <br><br><div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On 7 Sep 2018, at 17:30, Paul Tattersfield <<a href="mailto:gpmgroup@gmail.com">gpmgroup@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>when a party prevails in a URS case, the domain is locked for the life of the domain registration: "Immediately upon receipt of the Determination, the Registry Operator shall suspend the domain name, <u>which shall remain suspended for the balance of the registration period</u> and would not resolve to the original web site. "</div></blockquote></div></body></html>