<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Jonathan,<div><br></div><div>Regarding your comment:</div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class="null" style="border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px;"><div class="null" dir="auto"><div class="null"><div class="null"><div dir="ltr" class="null"><div class="null"><font color="#000000"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I think your idea that the Registrars/Registries should absorb the costs because they accepted the abusive registration would have more merit if the registries/registrars were not agnostic about the content of the registration</span></font></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPad</div><div><br></div><div>I did not say that it is their responsibility because they accepted the registration of the domain. What i said was that they knew about the URS/UDRP process and the possibility such a proceeding could be brought against any domain. They could have charged a fee. They didn't. So i don't feel that we need to come in and change what the registrars and their marketplace has already established.</div><div><br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br>On 7 Sep 2018, at 21:45, BECKHAM, Brian <<a href="mailto:brian.beckham@wipo.int">brian.beckham@wipo.int</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<div dir="ltr">Jonathan, can you expand on the idea that if registrars or registries (who by the way with the URS or UDRP are sheilded from the hassle of managing complaints directly) were compensated for locking a domain name, case processing would be more
efficient. Thx.</div>
<span id="draft-break"></span><br>
<br>
Brian<span id="draft-break"></span><br>
<br>
<div>
<div class="null" dir="auto">On 7 September 2018 at 19:45:29 CEST, Jonathan Frost <<a href="mailto:jonathan@get.club">jonathan@get.club</a>> wrote:<br class="null">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;" class="null">
<div class="null" dir="auto">
<div class="null">
<div class="null">
<div dir="ltr" class="null">I agree with you that the majority of cases are 1 year registration periods, but not all. But this a red herring from my original point that the parties that administer the curative RPMs should be treated (and compensated) equally.
The fact is, if the system were to build in cost recovery for the registrars and registries, it would result in more efficient processing, and more efficient administration of URS/UDRP.
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null">I think your idea that the Registrars/Registries should absorb the costs because they accepted the abusive registration would have more merit if the registries/registrars were not agnostic about the content of the registration. There isn't
a filtering mechanism to determine the content of a registration, and I think putting the registrars/registries in that position would raise free speech issues.</div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null">Jonathan<br class="null">
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="null">
<div nop="gmail_quote" class="null">
<div dir="ltr" class="null">On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:20 PM Paul Keating <<a href="mailto:paul@law.es" class="null">paul@law.es</a>> wrote:<br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null" ref="62204">
<div id="bx-quote-62204" class="null"><span class="null"></span></div>
</div>
<blockquote nop="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" class="null">
<div dir="auto" class="null">Jonathan,
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null">Thanks for the clarification.</div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)" class="null"><span nop="m_-8842617269451108096Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre-wrap" class="null"></span>when a party prevails in a URS case, the domain is locked for the life of the
domain registration: "Immediately upon receipt of the Determination, the Registry Operator shall suspend the domain name, <u class="null">which shall remain suspended for the balance of the registration period</u> and would not resolve to the original web
site. "</span></div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null">This raises the issue of the disparity when a domain is only registered for a 1-yr period or longer. I would presume most domains subject to a URS are short-term (1-yr registration).</div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null">In any case the registrar has received the registration fee it bargained for. It was aware of the URS/UDRP enforcement mechanisms at the time of registration. It could have imposed a fee or charged a higher price. If it chose not to do
so then such is life. Either way i see no reason to now transfer the costs to someone else. <br class="null">
<br class="null">
<div id="m_-8842617269451108096AppleMailSignature" class="null">Sent from my iPad</div>
<div class="null"><br class="null">
On 7 Sep 2018, at 17:30, Paul Tattersfield <<a href="mailto:gpmgroup@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="null">gpmgroup@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class="null">
<br class="null">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="null">
<div class="null">when a party prevails in a URS case, the domain is locked for the life of the domain registration: "Immediately upon receipt of the Determination, the Registry Operator shall suspend the domain name,
<u class="null">which shall remain suspended for the balance of the registration period</u> and would not resolve to the original web site. "</div>
</blockquote>
<span id="bx-quote-end-62204" class="null"></span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p> </p>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected
information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>