<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Agree with Paul. Comparing apples of contractual summary arbitration process with oranges of Article III court litigation tools</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div id="composer_signature">
<div dir="auto" style="font-size:85%; color:#575757">Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Paul Keating <paul@law.es> </div>
<div>Date: 1/5/19 8:54 AM (GMT-05:00) </div>
<div>To: Mitch Stoltz <mitch@eff.org> </div>
<div>Cc: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org </div>
<div>Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] ICE domain name seizures -- potential source of data for RPM PDP?
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am not sure I understand the relevance of investigating other non-UDRP enforcement activities and how the “list” would
<div>Benefit the group - outside of curiosity. These are independent of the UDRP process (just as any other legal proceedings are). Although the laws regarding confiscation are obtuse (to say the least) and slanted in favor of the governmental authority (at
least in the US) I still am not seeing how this might impact our work. While it is true that trademark owners may seek relief via the ICE process that is really no different that a group of trademark owners seeking assistance from the FBI.
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Paul<br>
<div><br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">Sent from the road. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On 2 Jan 2019, at 20:02, Mitch Stoltz <<a href="mailto:mitch@eff.org">mitch@eff.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">I disagree—more information about these seizures could absolutely inform our work. It would be useful to know what percentage of those million-plus domain names were seized for reasons relating to trademark infringement in the domain name itself
versus some objectionable content in the website, and whether the claims actually relate to trademark or copyright. Knowing whether ICE seizures are in fact addressing some of the same conduct as the ICANN RPMs, and what if any due process is being afforded,
will provide an important basis of comparison, because the RPMs don't operate in a vacuum.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Mitch Stoltz
Senior Staff Attorney, EFF | 415-436-9333 x142
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.eff.org%2fdonate&c=E,1,Cumh6CZgTi-TvCXtdxZyumTDLGnxQ2rru2H0sD0zpXpdHTQw7AwsLDqj8I9SsVCF-hA0dQ58119YrLf3hOqWpDjkXeUVm-aOA6aAVORmq9yQSYqVkQy9-Q,,&typo=1">https://www.eff.org/donate</a> | <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fact.eff.org%2f&c=E,1,-stK7H4DLzHglsiM2mSMwJ1f7cxk0mxcIjdHtgFpT0tTFsm1vdK-GKnoVJV5xDYJjkIdKHjuVz0__3p0oOFPd5kr-AvhD2ot6kIgaF20HLo,&typo=1">https://act.eff.org/</a>
</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/2/19 9:58 AM, Jonathan Frost via GNSO-RPM-WG wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">I think Phil has a good point here. Without a meaningful way to distinguish why exactly each domain was seized, the data would not be very useful beyond the mere knowledge that local governments are enforcing local IP laws.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jonathan</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:47 PM Corwin, Philip via GNSO-RPM-WG <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
Aside from the daunting challenge of analyzing a list of more than one million domain names, if such a list could be assembled I'm not sure it could inform our work in any meaningful way.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The new gTLD RPMs are focused on preventing and responding to a very narrow type of trademark infringement -- cybersquatting where the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark, where the registrant has no legitimate interest in the DN
and the domain is being used in bad faith to infringe trademark.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
While some of the seized domains referenced in the ICE press release may have met that test, many (likely the majority) probably did not, as the release makes clear that the primary focus was not the domain name but the sale/distribution of counterfeit goods
and copyright-infringing material --<br>
<br>
More than 1 million copyright-infringing website domain names selling counterfeit automotive parts, electrical components, personal care items and other fake goods were criminally and civilly seized in the past year through the
combined efforts of law- enforcement agencies across the world, high-profile industry representatives and anti-counterfeiting associations... The IPR Center, which stands at the forefront of the U.S. government's response
to IP theft, worked directly with key international law- enforcement authorities and industry organizations representing the electronics sector, luxury brand-name designers, film and entertainment and several entities specializing in apparel
and accessories through the major enforcement effort.... Investigations led by HSI resulted in the removal of copyright-infringing websites that sold counterfeit airbags and integrated sensors, both co<br>
mmodities that present a potential safety hazard. An investigation based in Louisiana led to the seizure of five website domain names - including
<a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fChinaseatbelt.com&c=E,1,yRvl_xL_kjkZv1kr_FQ-PIXGszIbxmMuzX9lyEjp5AfJ7NACPSPuAxWChal9KIG3BKlZpcb-VR4IzgWEJTL7-2t96UDRpunfnn8dMcXFTXHMJV3Pd9fOpltMIKld&typo=1">
Chinaseatbelt.com</a>; <a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fAirbagpart.com&c=E,1,ny3yjSsUSNr7fuxYD_zixthVYrzB88LIU_zXL94lHY3qW1WxFhtig7P_w94I95mBY-uIIelOnVegIRwgJRQhmUznd3cWfNnBwYv9iDijsA7NMA,,&typo=1">
Airbagpart.com</a>; <a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fChinasafetybelt.com&c=E,1,ZcpcF5pugiRRYVCL4X1vEWLUZ0bEZCyM3d9FQrfquketta_Pl2EXV3tq8epPe5YndRS4hNntf3EquD6EcsvDwFQn7F-UU7O6mlb-0G0n3bcRro5_7WfK99UT-wh9&typo=1">
Chinasafetybelt.com</a>; <a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fFareurope.com&c=E,1,EOYk6vJdsPs_WT0MeyLW9unIF-1CVEKQVWzeFbfKRTBiyIedekLFzzU5JTOBl7KcNHSOPWXWooinURu3iJQhQ0KOG4SU9Aj1i-TczK5X&typo=1">Fareurope.com</a>; and
<a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fFar-europe.com&c=E,1,grU8StzZGlaQ2lYoBCvvtCn_KVJCDEylI1cM-CRQj7lYeBP37dn8VZzOz9hum2UoqP_uh44foi9OzY-rOZrzjBSLwvrzoGszXSF4rst8&typo=1">
Far-europe.com</a> - involved in the sale of fake automotive parts. A joint case between HSI and Department of Defense investigative agencies resulted in the removal of <a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fPRBlogics.com&c=E,1,pi8V5SBIyAEqjT9WlvoHQtqfaoPZBNKijQ_AXbjYdwKsEBpS4EJhkeMtAIWbl3djbUte6XgkEnHml_NQDq-ZCh4Y62VZnhYEIU5qQQuJwTXB1I2l2GuqdA,,&typo=1">PRBlogics.com</a>,
a copyright-infringing website offering counterfeit integrated sensors.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
So the ICANN RPMs are focused on the "apples" of a very specific and narrow type of TM infringement that looks at domain content for evidence of bad faith use, while the government domain seizures do not focus on the domain name but the "oranges" use of the
website to distribute counterfeit goods or infringed copyrighted content.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Aside from that, assembling the domain names would likely be impossible, given that the release makes clear that the million-plus seizures is a cumulative annual tally based on actions taken by law enforcement agencies around the world.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Finally, as the Techdirt blog states, the release is somewhat confusing in regard to what IP infringement was actually involved---<br>
<br>
Still, it seems notable that in late November, ICE proudly announced that it had seized over a million websites, though frankly, the press release raises a hell of a lot more questions than it answers. First off, it appears that ICE has no clue that copyright
and trademark are entirely different things. <br>
<br>
More than 1 million copyright-infringing website domain names selling counterfeit automotive parts, electrical components, personal care items and other fake goods were criminally and civilly seized in the past year through the combined efforts of law-enforcement
agencies across the world, high-profile industry representatives and anti-counterfeiting associations.
<br>
<br>
"Copyright infringing website domain names" already is a weird description (were the URLs themselves infringing?) but it's made even weirder by saying that these sites were seized because they were selling counterfeits. Counterfeiting is a trademark issue,
not a copyright one. Those laws are entirely different.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
In conclusion, unless we are contemplating expansion of the ICANN RPMs beyond a narrow form of cybersquatting to cover sale of counterfeit goods and websites infringing copyright (a proposition for which consensus could not likely be achieved), even if the
million-plus domain names could be obtained their relationship to our work seems tangential at best.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Philip S. Corwin<br>
<br>
Policy Counsel<br>
<br>
VeriSign, Inc.<br>
<br>
12061 Bluemont Way<br>
<br>
Reston, VA 20190<br>
<br>
703-948-4648/Direct<br>
<br>
571-342-7489/Cell<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: GNSO-RPM-WG [mailto:<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of George Kirikos<br>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2019 11:48 AM<br>
To: gnso-rpm-wg <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>><br>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [GNSO-RPM-WG] ICE domain name seizures -- potential source of data for RPM PDP?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi folks,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Happy New Year.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
There was news about ICE seizing over 1 million domain names, see:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ice.gov%2fnews%2freleases%2fover-million-websites-seized-global-operation&c=E,1,S2hNQJZmJQ2caOOHZy98gwpXXUwI3IeBZXg1Nrati1iQNhRdqbP6p4KM7vn2jOpPmJ1M8u_mCSIgRqXiYV25u4S8MNBzytRlgO1FO-c4&typo=1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/over-million-websites-seized-global-operation</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181213/18030341224/ice-seizes-over-1-million-websites-with-no-due-process-apparently-unaware-that-copyright-trademark-are-different.shtml" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181213/18030341224/ice-seizes-over-1-million-websites-with-no-due-process-apparently-unaware-that-copyright-trademark-are-different.shtml</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I was curious whether anyone (maybe a registrar, registry, or TM holders who were involved, i.e. the "industry partners") has and can share the complete list of domain names that were seized, as that might be a potential source of data for our work.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
George Kirikos<br>
<br>
416-588-0269<br>
<br>
<a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.leap.com%2f&c=E,1,zy3q4K82-mizg8fSkSq--12k0DC7NeV7n0j3DvP8b1TzwBAmvqGcKMk8sCfua0xZajhyWRIhfU3WJfjJtkA5wvd9N3x7VBLObgPY02t-qa8s7b7gEGMrZRTFF3MA&typo=1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org" target="_blank">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a><br>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org" target="_blank">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<font face="Arial" color="Gray" size="1"><br>
This message contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error,
please send me an email and delete this message. Any tax advice provided by VLP is for your use only and cannot be used to avoid tax penalties or for promotional or marketing purposes.<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>