<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Dear George and RPM PDP Working Group members,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Please see the attached response from the RPM PDP Working Group Co-Chairs.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com><br><b>Date: </b>Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 11:16 PM<br><b>To: </b>George Kirikos <icann@leap.com><br><b>Cc: </b>gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>, Pam Little <pam.little@alibaba-inc.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "kdrazek@verisign.com" <kdrazek@verisign.com><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] George Kirikos Section 3.7 appeal in RPM PDP working group<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Some procedure thoughts and quick notes on the fly: <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>- This appeal doesn't suspended the regular work of the wg, it continues in parallel. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>- Before going to the Chairs of the Council it has to go through the WG chairs. One just cannot skip the process unilaterally considering it pre done. I might even ask myself if this has to go to the chartering group chairs or their liason, since is only sharing information and the appeal process talks about a designated representative. That would be Paul McGrady if the WG chairs don't solve the concern. And that's it, in any case.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>- The appeal process only constitutes the right to be heard, but nothing has to be done unless the authority, chairs or chartering chairs, decided to do so according to their own rules. After that, the member appealing has reached it's end with the matter, regardless of their satisfaction with the result.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Best,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Martin<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 22:33 George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>Typo, I of course meant to write "NOT to obstruct our work".<br><br>Sincerely,<br><br>George Kirikos<br>416-588-0269<br><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=nyJKPD2Bs8jf1LtVLTr2I3bzw2vKbR1yXEm1vy599j4&s=ascUYZ1SixztXm5-WdR6c0zk45bUOsqTytGk8iXyfqI&e=" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/ [leap.com]</a><br><br>On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:30 PM George Kirikos <<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank">icann@leap.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> Hi folks,<br>><br>> As previously discussed, attached is the Section 3.7 appeal brought<br>> under the working group guidelines. As mentioned on the sub teams<br>> list, this is meant to be constructive, to to obstruct our work, but<br>> to call to the attention of "the powers that be" the realities on the<br>> ground that they appear to not be aware of or are ignoring.<br>><br>> Sincerely,<br>><br>> George Kirikos<br>> 416-588-0269<br>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=nyJKPD2Bs8jf1LtVLTr2I3bzw2vKbR1yXEm1vy599j4&s=ascUYZ1SixztXm5-WdR6c0zk45bUOsqTytGk8iXyfqI&e=" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/ [leap.com]</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org" target="_blank">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>