<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">Thanks Kathy, and I agree that the WG review and resulting proposed fixes and recommendations already speak to this concern. 
<div dir="ltr">Brian </div>
</div>
<span id="draft-break"></span><br>
<br>
Sent from my WIPO mobile<span id="draft-break"></span><br>
<br>
<div>
<div class="null" dir="auto">On 11 December 2019 at 18:25:38 CET, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> wrote:<br class="null">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;" class="null">
<div class="null" dir="auto">
<div class="null">
<div class="null" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p class="null">Dear Paul,</p>
<p class="null">I am writing as co-chair, but without the opportunity to talk with my other co-chairs. We did a complete investigation of each and every one of the URS cases which had taken place up to a certain time (I believe it was the end of 2018). Each
 and every case was reviewed by someone in this WG. Everyone had the chance to participate. Harvard Law School further created detailed tables.<br class="null">
</p>
<p class="null">Then we had to stop our research and analysis. At a certain point, you have to draw a line a line and move on. In this case, we moved on to our work on the TM Notices, Sunrise Periods and Trademark Clearinghouse reviews. 
<br class="null">
</p>
<p class="null"><i class="null">But we have a timeline, and the GNSO Council needs our work in Phase One to include in the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook.</i> All of the cases you mention, and which we appreciate, fall after our window of analysis. 
<br class="null">
</p>
<p class="null">Quick personal note that I think our recommendations clearly address at least one issue that you raise in your email.  One, and I quote,
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span style="color:red" class="null">"Effectively blank – just a repeat of the URS rules Not even mention of what was being claimed"
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span style="color:red" class="null"></span>==>  this is being addressed in a URS recommendation going out for public comment.
<br class="null">
</span></p>
<p class="null">Best, Kathy<br class="null">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"></span></p>
<div class="null">On 12/11/2019 11:49 AM, Paul Tattersfield wrote:<br class="null">
</div>
<div class="null" ref="44069">
<div id="bx-quote-44069" class="null"><span class="null"></span></div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="null">
<div class="null">
<div dir="ltr" class="null">
<div dir="ltr" class="null">
<p class="null" style="margin: 0px;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Dear All,<br class="null">
<br class="null">
Here are 3 example URS determinations that seem very troubling from the public information available. As I pointed out on the call last week, the recommendations from the WG subgroups fail to prevent what seem to be very problematic determinations occurring.
 I hope all working group members will agree this situation in the absence of further facts is totally unacceptable and those leading the working group will take the necessary action to ensure the initial report will include recommendations to ensure nothing
 like this will be allowed to happen again.<br class="null">
<br class="null">
Yours sincerely,<br class="null">
<br class="null">
Paul.<br class="null">
<br class="null">
<br class="null">
<br class="null">
<b class="null">cfa.club<span class="null">                </span></b><span class="null">                               
</span><span class="null">                                </span>Creation date <span style="color:red" class="null">
July 17, 2017</span><br class="null">
Registrar<span class="null">                                              </span>
<span class="null">                </span><a href="http://www.eachnic.com" target="_BLANK" class="null">www.eachnic.com</a><br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Complainant submitted<span class="null">              
</span><span class="null">                                </span>September 19, 2019<br class="null">
Commencement<span class="null">                              </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 7, 2019<br class="null">
Default Date<span class="null">                                      </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 22, 2019<br class="null">
<span style="color:red" class="null">Domain </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">Suspended</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span class="null">                       
</span><span class="null">                </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">October 25, 2019</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
Examiner<span class="null">                                             </span><span class="null">               
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Flip Jan Claude Petillion<br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><a href="https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1862966D.htm" target="_BLANK" class="null">https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1862966D.htm</a><br class="null">
Claimant<span class="null">              </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">CFA Institute of Charlottesville<br class="null">
Represented<span class="null">     </span>DLA Piper LLP (US) of Washington<br class="null">
Respondent<span class="null">       </span>Hao Ming of Beijing, International, CN.<br class="null">
Rationale<br class="null">
<i class="null"><span style="color:red" class="null">The Complainant holds that the Respondent is attempting to disrupt the business of a competitor but provides no proof that the Respondent is one of its competitors. However, the passive holding of a domain
 name can constitute bad faith registration and use, especially when combined with other factors such as the respondent preventing a trademark or service mark holder from reflecting its mark in a corresponding domain name,</span> the failure of the respondent
 to respond to the complaint, inconceivable good faith use, etc. (See e.g., Telstra Corporation Limited, Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-0003; Myer Stores Limited v. Mr. David John Singh, WIPO Case No. D2001-0763; Liu.Jo
 S.p.A. v. Martina Hamsikova, WIPO Case No. D2013-1261). In the present case, Respondent is passively holding the disputed domain name as it does not resolve to any active</i></span><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" class="null"> website.
<br class="null">
<br class="null">
</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">It is inconceivable to the Examiner that Respondent was unaware of Complainant and its trademark rights when it registered the disputed domain name which
 is identical to Complainant’s CFA registered trademark. Given the well-known character of Complainant's CFA trademark, Respondent must have had Complainant's trademark in mind when registering the disputed domain name. This is further supported by the fact
 that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name under the new gTLD “.CLUB”, which increases confusion as the Complainant’s members can be considered as being part of a club. Moreover, Examiner finds that, given the well-known character of the Complainant’s
 CFA trademark, it is difficult to imagine any future good faith use of the disputed domain name by Respondent.
<br class="null">
</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Respondent did not file any response to contest the above. Therefore, Examiner finds that the third element for Complainant to obtain the suspension of a
 domain name under URS 1.2.6.3 has been proven<br class="null">
<br class="null">
<br class="null">
</span></i><b class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">cfa.community</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span class="null">                
</span><span class="null">                                </span>Creation date <span style="color:red" class="null">
September 24, 2019</span><br class="null">
Registrar<span class="null">                                                             
</span><a href="http://domains.google.com" target="_BLANK" class="null">domains.google.com</a><br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Complainant Submitted<span class="null">              
</span><span class="null">                </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 8, 2019 <br class="null">
Commencement<span class="null">                              </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 8, 2019 <br class="null">
Default Date<span class="null">                                      </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 23, 2019<br class="null">
<span style="color:red" class="null">Domain </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">Suspended</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span class="null">                       
</span><span class="null">                </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">October 23, 2019</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
Examiner<span class="null">                                             </span><span class="null">               
</span>Dawn Osborne</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><a href="https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1862966D.htm" target="_BLANK" class="null">https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1862966D.htm</a><br class="null">
Claimant<span class="null">              </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">CFA Institute of Charlottesville<br class="null">
Represented<span class="null">     </span>DLA Piper LLP (US) of Washington<br class="null">
Respondent<span class="null">       </span>Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1245526592 of Toronto, ON, CA<br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Rationale<br class="null">
<span style="color:red" class="null">Effectively blank – just a repeat of the URS rules Not even mention of what was being claimed</span><br class="null">
<br class="null">
<br class="null">
<b class="null">cfa.plus<span class="null">                </span></b><span class="null">                               
</span><span class="null">                </span><span class="null">               
</span>Creation date <span style="color:red" class="null">September 25, 2019</span><br class="null">
Registrar<span class="null">                                                             
</span><a href="http://www.west.cn/" target="_BLANK" class="null">www.west.cn</a><br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Complainant Submitted<span class="null">              
</span><span class="null">                </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 16, 2019 <br class="null">
Commencement<span class="null">              </span><span class="null">                               
</span>October 17, 2019 <br class="null">
Response Date<span class="null"> </span><span class="null">                </span>
<span class="null">                                </span>October 29, 2019<br class="null">
<span style="color:red" class="null">Domain </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">Suspended</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span class="null">                                       
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">October 29, 2019</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
Examiner<span class="null">             </span><span class="null">                                               
</span>David L. Kreider<br class="null">
<a href="https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1866970F.htm" target="_BLANK" class="null">https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1866970F.htm</a><br class="null">
Claimant<span class="null">              </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">CFA Institute of Charlottesville<br class="null">
Represented<span class="null">     </span>DLA Piper LLP (US) of Washington<br class="null">
Respondent<span class="null">       </span>Peng Cheng Li of He Nan, International, CN<br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Rationale<br class="null">
</span><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">“The Respondent submits in support of his Response a certificate of qualification issued to the Respondent, Peng Cheng Li (</span></i><i class="null"><span style="" class="null">李鹏程</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">),
 by the China Commodities Association and dated November 2012, along with a business license dated 23 September 2019, pertaining to a Shanghai-based information technology company.  Respondent’s said certificates each bear the legend: “For use as evidence in
 the CFA Institute’s <cfa.plus> litigation only”.    <br class="null">
</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">Respondent concedes that he “had made no formal use of the domain name” by the time he received notice of the commencement of these URS proceedings on October
 17, 2019.  Significantly, moreover, the Panel notes the complete absence of evidence to show demonstrable preparations to use the Disputed Domain Name, or a name corresponding to the domain name, in connection with any bona fide offering of goods or services.<br class="null">
<br class="null">
The Panel concludes that the Registrant intentionally sought to disrupt the business of a competitor or use the <cfa.plus> domain name to attract for commercial gain, Internet users to Registrant’s web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood
 of confusion with the Complainant’s CFA Mark, as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of Registrant’s product or service on that web site or location</span></i><i class="null"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:red" class="null">, or both.<br class="null">
</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
<br class="null">
<b class="null">cfa.business</b><span class="null">                                                      
</span>Creation date August 28, 2019<br class="null">
Registrar<span class="null">                                                             
</span><a href="http://www.godaddy.com/" target="_BLANK" class="null">www.godaddy.com</a><br class="null">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Complainant Submitted<span class="null">              
</span><span class="null">                </span><span class="null">               
</span>October 16, 2019 <br class="null">
Commencement<span class="null">                                              </span>
October 17, 2019 <br class="null">
Default Date<span class="null">      </span><span class="null">                                               
</span>November 1, 2019<br class="null">
<span style="color:red" class="null">Domain </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:red" class="null">Returned</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><span class="null">                                           
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">November 1, 2019</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null"><br class="null">
Examiner<span class="null">                                                            
</span>Richard W. Hill<br class="null">
<a href="https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1866971D.htm" target="_BLANK" class="null">https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1866971D.htm</a><br class="null">
Claimant<span class="null">              </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">CFA Institute of Charlottesville<br class="null">
Represented<span class="null">     </span>DLA Piper LLP (US) of Washington<br class="null">
Respondent<span class="null">       </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font_size:11pt; font-family:Calibri" class="null">Domains By Proxy, LLC / DomainsByProxy.com of Scottsdale, AZ, US<br class="null">
Rationale<br class="null">
“<i class="null">Complainant states: "By creating confusion through its registration of a domain name wholly comprised of CFA Marks, Respondent is attempting to disrupt the business of a competitor, which is evidence of bad faith registration<span style="color:red" class="null">."
 Complainant provides evidence showing that the disputed domain name is not being used. Since the standard of review in URS proceedings is "clear and convincing", and Complainant does not explain why failure to use the disputed domain name could constitute
 bad faith use</span>, the Panel finds that Complainant has not satisfied its burden of proof for this element.”</i></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br class="null">
<fieldset class="null"></fieldset>
<pre class="null">_______________________________________________
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
<a class="null" href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a>
<a class="null" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" target="_BLANK">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a class="null" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_BLANK">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a class="null" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_BLANK">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<span id="bx-quote-end-44069" class="null"></span></div>
<div class="null"><ATT00001.txt></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p> </p>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected
 information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>