<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:103155176;
mso-list-template-ids:1908051242;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1606377418;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-469574420 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Dear All,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: auto;text-align:start;widows: auto;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: auto;text-align:start;widows: auto;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Please see below the action items captured by staff from the<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt">RPM PDP Working Group<span style="color:black"> call held on</span> 10 March
2019 at 18:30 UTC at the virtual ICANN67 meeting<span style="color:black">. Staff
</span>will post<span style="color:black"> these to the wiki space. <b><i>Please note that these
</i></b></span><b><i>are<span style="color:black"> high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording</span>, chat room, or transcript</i></b><i><span style="color:black">.</span></i><span style="color:black"> The recording, Zoom chat,</span>
transcript<span style="color:black"> and attendance records are posted on the wiki<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>at</span>:
</span><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2020-03-10+ICANN67+-+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG">https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2020-03-10+ICANN67+-+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Best Regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: auto;text-align:start;widows: auto;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="font-size:12.0pt">Julie</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: auto;text-align:start;widows: auto;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="font-size:12.0pt">Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">==</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">NOTES & ACTION ITEMS</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Actions:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Review of EPDP Suggested Potential/Preliminary Recommendations</span></b><b><o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">ACTION ITEMS:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="1">
<li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
Accept the minor/non-substantive edits to the first paragraph of the recommendation.<o:p></o:p></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
Delete the substantive edits to the second paragraph of the recommendation, but maintain the minor/non-substantive edits.<o:p></o:p></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
Delete the third paragraph of the recommendation and make it a question for public comment.<o:p></o:p></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
In the context section quote from Appendix D of the Temp Spec.<o:p></o:p></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Notes:<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">1. Review of EPDP Suggested Potential/Preliminary Recommendations</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">URS Recommendation #1:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">“Furthermore, the Working Group recommends that, to the extent this is operationally feasible, legally compliant and consistent with the final Phase 1 recommendations from the Expedited Policy
Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data, the URS Procedure para 3.3 be amended to allow the Complainant to update the Complaint within 2-3 calendar days after the URS Provider provides updated discloses the registration
data related to the disputed domain name(s).”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Question about “operationally feasible, legally compliant” – need to be clearer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Reflects some of the concerns that people have had in the EPDP context. Given that we haven’t had the benefit of interactions with the providers who are getting the data and giving it
to the complainant – we don’t know if our recommendation is feasible. So we put the caveats in. The EPDP also is wrestling with this as part of its Phase 2 recommendations. So we should reflect the need for any new requirement to be legally compliant.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Who decides “legally compliant” – this is something the EDPD is talking about. The plan is that this is something that needs to be further discussed as part of implementation.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- The language around “legally compliant” is not as crisp. Suggest: “… to the extent that this is operationally feasible, compliant with applicable law, and consistent with the final Phase
1 recommendations …”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- FORUM has a process of automatically generating the complaint with the WHOIS information will populate automatically. We know that is often redacted. We contact the registry and sometimes
the registrar to obtain the full contact information. When it comes to the amendment to the complaint that currently isn’t allowed under the rules. As far as the 2-3 calendar day window – for UDRP we require a 5-day window. That is a short window but you
have to balance that with how fast you want the URS to be. We think that is feasible.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Paragraphs 1 and 2 don’t change the WG’s recommendations. They were put in as we were discussing the EPDP and CCT-RT recommendations with the Co-Chairs. We thought we should make it
clear that these two paragraphs do take into account the EPDP recommendations.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Paragraph 3 is new. Staff is suggesting that new text to address whether there are GDPR implications.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Strongly object to the addition of paragraph 3 and don’t think we need to alter paragraphs 1 and 2.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Think about striking paragraph 3 and new language in paragraph 2. Add a paragraph that we recognize that this recommendation is going to affect the URS rules and supplemental rules but
also rule 15 of the URS and once the registrant’s data is known that it could request that it continue to be shielded.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Seems clear that the WG does not support paragraph 3 as a recommendation, but could be a question for public comment. Paragraph 2 – take the highlighted language out and note in the context
that there was a range of views to flag it for public comment.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- Majority of WG members on the call supported maintaining the original language of paragraph 2, which was agreed to by the WG.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black">-- EPDP tried to avoid using the terminology of “thin” registry. Staff suggestion is that we quote from appendix D of the Temp Spec, to make it clearer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="color:black">ACTION ITEMS:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" start="5" type="1">
<li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
<b>Accept the minor/non-substantive edits to the first paragraph of the recommendation.<o:p></o:p></b></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
<b>Delete the substantive edits to the second paragraph of the recommendation, but maintain the minor/non-substantive edits.<o:p></o:p></b></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
<b>Delete the third paragraph of the recommendation and make it a question for public comment.<o:p></o:p></b></li><li style="color:black;margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">
<b>In the context section quote from Appendix D of the Temp Spec.<o:p></o:p></b></li></ol>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">2. </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Review of CCT-RT </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Suggested Potential/Preliminary <span style="color:black">Recommendations<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt">-- New text on page 14 – staff wishes to confirm that the WG agrees with the summary of how the WG addressed the CCT-RT’s recommendations #9, #27, and #28.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt">-- There are recommendations that related to the CCT-RT’s recommendations, but these are not addressed in a specific way.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- The WG members had no changes to the text.<span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>