<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Hi Marie,</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I’m really not sure why this is such a difficult issue or why great effort is being made to misconstrue my email and request. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I responded to a challenge and stated that I am speaking on behalf of myself and others regarding the impression that was left with us at the end of last week’s call. Nothing more, nothing less. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Again, we are not seeking to end the TMCH. We are looking to address a problem that was identified and to avoid abuse of the TMCH.<span style="font-size: inherit;"> We should all want a more effective and efficient TMCH and to ensure it’s
operating properly. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I believe my emails have all stated the constructive purpose is to find a suitable solution to the problem, not to ignore your comments. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size: inherit;">Jason </span><br>
</div>
<div class="ms-outlook-ios-signature" id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="id-fe952e15-5959-400a-89d1-b75eb3ab9df3" class="ms-outlook-mobile-reference-message">
<hr style="display: inline-block; width: 98%; font-family: -webkit-standard; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:59 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org; Jason Schaeffer<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cking@modernip.com; Michael Karanicolas; 'Julie Hedlund'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> FW: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
<div> </div>
</font></div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
@font-face
{font-family:"Century Gothic"}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{margin-right:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif}
p.msochpdefault, li.msochpdefault, div.msochpdefault
{margin-right:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif}
span.emailstyle22
{font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
span.EmailStyle20
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black}
.MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt}
div.WordSection1
{}
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm}
-->
</style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Jason, </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">To quote you, “suffice to say” others are “not alone in this [opposing] sentiment” either. That’s the whole point – despite the many advances and great work done over the years, we don’t all agree with everything.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I don’t find the words “blindside attack”,
</span> <span style="color:black">“procedural issue of fairness and correcting this point” or “super priority to a limited class” terribly helpful, or indeed a genuine representation of the (years of) discussion on this issue.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">All RPMs could, should you choose to categorise them as such, fall into your last quote. Very few voices have seriously pushed for an end to all RPMs, and we wouldn’t have spent 4 years getting to where we are
now had that been the case.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As for the first two, in every call where we’ve looked at the individual proposals, whomever the Chair of that call, we’ve also looked at who the respondents were and have always noted if the (e.g.) NCSG, CPH,
BC etc. was for/anti/suggested amendments. The issues that many of us have with the “doughnut” percentages have again been noted on every such call. Our role is absolutely to have regard to all views and comments, but I do stand by my view that should I choose
to respond in my personal capacity to any consultation (ICANN or otherwise), while I would certainly hope that my comments were processed and considered I wouldn’t expect that they would carry a stronger (or even equal) voice than that of (e.g.) a SG/C, association
representing 1000s, NGO etc. (delete as appropriate). And as Cyntia notes below, there were no comments received (pro or anti) that rendered any new information.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">All individual proposals were put forward as the WG could not decide (after years of debate) if they should be recommendations. At this stage, some have passed through that threshold, some haven’t – and they were
from very different proponents. We all know that we’re beyond rehashing the same views re the substance (again).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">You’re right that it impacts the CPH; they did not support the proposal.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I don’t find it helpful to look for malicious intent as regards this one proposal (I see none) and/or to treat it differently from every other. So while I appreciate both your perspective and passion, I respectfully
agree with Cyntia, and the majority view on last week’s call, that there just isn’t sufficient support in the WG for this proposal to take even more of our time.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Best to all (and Happy Belgian National Day!)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Marie</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Jason Schaeffer <jason@esqwire.com>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:35 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> cking@modernip.com; 'Michael Karanicolas' <mkaranicolas@gmail.com>; Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be><br>
<b>Cc:</b> 'Julie Hedlund' <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cyntia,<span style="font-size:12.0pt"></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Suffice to say I am not alone in this sentiment. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are in agreement that we have a duty to ourselves and others, and that all of our time is valuable and not to be wasted. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">As I’ve stated from the outset, we did not address the merits and it behooves us to give this the attention it deserves. We have a known problem, and while we can debate the extent of the problem (as we don’t have complete information),
we should all want some degree of oversight of an independent database. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am aware others in the WG had and me still be considering workable alternatives. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Had we discussed the merits on the last call we just might have found the answer to this issue. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jason Schaeffer </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">ESQwire.com P.C.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="id-f0bbc6f4-9811-4055-9740-6e821d4d6824">
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="2" width="98%" noshade="" align="center" style="color:black">
</div>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> cking@modernip.com <cking@modernip.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 6:13 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jason Schaeffer; 'Michael Karanicolas'; 'Marie Pattullo'<br>
<b>Cc:</b> 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Jason,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">As I stated on the call, I think we’re doing very well as a group.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">And I take exception that there was a “blindside attack” by the participants of the call. The discussion was how much weight to give individual voices vs. the collective voices of organizations
– an issue we must deal with often, both delicately & judiciously when reviewing community input in a consensus environment.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Our “duty” is to do the best we can with the time that we have and to be aware of, but not subordinate to, other working groups. We need not wonder about the interplay of constituent
groups when those folks are represented on our own calls.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Again, your characterization of granting a “super priority to a limited class” misses the fact that this RPM was the result of years of discussion as part of a whole, new gTLD environment
created by consensus of ICANN constituencies. As such, it requires consensus to re-make the RPM.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">We’re all aware that there are documented cases of abuse on both sides of this mechanism. The question is how to address it. Unfortunately, the Proposal on the table, such as it is,
is not acceptable to half of stakeholders.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Therefore, if there’s a new “workable way to have oversight” then someone in the working group should propose a modified Proposal 7, which can then be reviewed by the group, which could
then choose to support, not support, or refer to the GNSO for further action.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Outside of a modified Proposal 7, we should move forward rather than re-hashing ground covered last week.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"> </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">Cyntia King</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">O: +1 816.633.7647</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">C: +1 818.209.6088</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"><img width="129" height="58" id="_x0000_i1029" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D65EB5.0CAB6920" alt="Email Logo5" style="width:1.3437in; height:.6041in"></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Jason Schaeffer <jason@esqwire.com> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 4:40 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> cking@modernip.com; 'Michael Karanicolas' <mkaranicolas@gmail.com>; 'Marie Pattullo' <marie.pattullo@aim.be><br>
<b>Cc:</b> 'Julie Hedlund' <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cyntia,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for reviewing my statement. While technically correct, you left out the key issue that I and others were responding to was a blindside attack on the value of certain voices. Our time was spent responding to a procedural issue
of fairness and correcting this point. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I believe we should all be able to agree that if there’s a workable way to have oversight and review of the TMCH then it’s our duty to do so. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’ll point out that this impacts Registries, Registrars, and Registrants and I’m aware of how this interplays with other discussions in different WGs. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are discussing a mechanism that grants super priority to a limited class and, despite efforts to reframe or dismiss the issue, has documented cases of abuse. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I share your concerns about giving cybersquatters another way to game the system, but that should not be the measure by which we fail to take action. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Surely we can do better than this as a group. Again, we may find otherwise on tomorrow’s call, but I don’t believe anyone has stated that there shouldn’t be a review and/or oversight of the TMCH. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jason Schaeffer </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">ESQwire.com P.C.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="id-7bc62177-d2d5-4968-974c-7c725cc5480d">
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="2" width="98%" noshade="" align="center" style="color:black">
</div>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com">cking@modernip.com</a> <<a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com">cking@modernip.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 5:04 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Michael Karanicolas'; 'Marie Pattullo'<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Jason Schaeffer; 'Julie Hedlund'; <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Just want to point out that we spoke about this Proposal for 25 mins (almost 1/3 of our meeting) last week. And at the end of the discussion Jason himself said “</span><span style="font-size:13.5pt; font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif; color:black">I
agree that I said before that I stand on my position to everybody that we don't have consensus and that's what's that's what's troubling. We can't even get something out of, out of the gate here, which is a very important issue, but I agree, we move on. Great.
Thank you.</span><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Not sure why we would revisit the topic & spend even more time agreeing there’s not consensus on this.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Our remit in this review was to a) identify whether the comments provided new perspectives (Thursday’s discussion revealed no material new info, just the same arguments that have been
made before), or b) whether there was widespread opposition/support not already considered (Thursday’s discussion, again, did not offer a new, widespread opinion not already considered).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">In the end, we could go round-and-round on several of these issues for time unending, but the GNSO has been clear that such unending debate is not acceptable.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"> </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">Cyntia King</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">O: +1 816.633.7647</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">C: +1 818.209.6088</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"><img border="0" width="129" height="58" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D65EB5.0CAB6920" alt="Email Logo5" style="width:1.3437in; height:.6041in"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Michael Karanicolas <<a href="mailto:mkaranicolas@gmail.com">mkaranicolas@gmail.com</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 3:32 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Marie Pattullo <<a href="mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be">marie.pattullo@aim.be</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Jason Schaeffer <<a href="mailto:jason@esqwire.com">jason@esqwire.com</a>>;
<a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com">cking@modernip.com</a>; Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I agree with Jason that the issue merits further discussion. I had a conflict last week, and was unable to join the call, but I also did not get the impression that the transparency issue was thoroughly discussed. This is an issue of central
importance to the working group's mandate and, frankly, its legitimacy. There were substantive issues raised in the comments which were not discussed, and which warrant the group's consideration.</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:21 PM Marie Pattullo <<a href="mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be">marie.pattullo@aim.be</a>> wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none; border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt; padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt; margin-left:4.8pt; margin-top:5.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Thank you for the suggestion Jason; however, I agree with Cynthia.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As stated in the Initial Report itself:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="color:black">“Some Working Group members suspected that trademark owners may have the potential to abuse Sunrise due to TMCH’s acceptance of non-standard character claim marks and common/dictionary
words, as well as the broad scope of registration within the TMCH. <b><i>However, there is a lack of concrete evidence to substantiate that suspicion</i></b>”. (pages 45 & 42).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">(Emphasis added).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As discussed re all other individual proposals, at this stage we are not discussing substance but whether there is sufficient support to put them forward for a consensus call. There was neither sufficient support
in our Working Group, nor in the public comments, for this proposal. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I also have a different reading of Deloitte’s comment: to me</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="color:black">"Deloitte is taking this opportunity to share its point of view on Individual Proposal #7 that the TMCH should transition from a closed database to an open and searchable database....”
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">reads that they are quoting the proposal; either way, as a service provider I don’t think their voice has weight here, especially as they (rightly) go on to say that:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="color:black">“...Deloitte wants to emphasize that ICANN is the owner of the TMCH database and that not Deloitte, but IBM operates the TMDB. In this regard, it is up to ICANN and the Community to take
the ultimate decision to move from a closed to an open database”. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">We’ve discussed this issue at (great) length over the past years and, agreeing with Cynthia, this is not the best use of the limited time we have left.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Kind regards</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Marie</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> GNSO-RPM-WG <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jason Schaeffer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 9:09 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com" target="_blank">cking@modernip.com</a>; 'Julie Hedlund' <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org" target="_blank">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Cyntia,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Question 7 deserves the same treatment as other questions and the public comments should be reviewed. We were side tracked at the end of the call last week and didn’t get to the merits.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There's a documented problem of abuse and the ONLY opposition is based on the concern that cybersquatters will themselves abuse the open TMCH. No one said they don't want oversight of the TMCH -- at least not openly.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Moreover, if you review your notes and the comments there’s support and room for a compromise. Others have seemed to indicate a willingness to solve the problem.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Jason</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com" target="_blank">
cking@modernip.com</a> <<a href="mailto:cking@modernip.com" target="_blank">cking@modernip.com</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 2:01 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jason Schaeffer <<a href="mailto:jason@esqwire.com" target="_blank">jason@esqwire.com</a>>; 'Julie Hedlund' <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org" target="_blank">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Hi All,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">Respectfully, I believe this would be a waste of our remaining time.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">The Proposal had significant opposition (at least as much opposition as support). As well, consensus has never been reached in discussions by the full working group or (2) subgroups.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">As consensus is needed to change an RPM that is itself the result of consensus discussions; and</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">As we haven’t been close to consensus in the working group, sub-groups or public comments; then</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif">I suggest we complete our review concentrating on Proposals where consensus may still be possible.</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"> </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">
</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">Cyntia King</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">O: +1 816.633.7647</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D">C: +1 818.209.6088</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif; color:#0D0D0D"><img border="0" width="129" height="58" id="gmail-m_2534361844928752888Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D65EB5.0CAB6920" alt="Email Logo5" style="width:1.3437in; height:.6041in"></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Century Gothic",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> GNSO-RPM-WG <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jason Schaeffer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 11:18 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org" target="_blank">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all, </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In advance of tomorrow’s call, I am requesting that we continue discussion on the
<u>merits</u> of TMCH Question #7. Upon reflection, at the end of the last WG call, we neither discussed the public comments nor debated the underlying merits of the positions regarding opening of the TMCH.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As we are all aware, we are not debating whether or not there has been abuse of the TMCH. The only question is how much abuse has occurred. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Further, those opposed to opening the TMCH DB to oversight appear to object on the basis that cybersquatters and wrongdoers will abuse the newly opened DB. It does not appear that
<u>anyone</u> rejects having oversight of the TMCH or an ability to ensure that it is operating correctly (without abuse). Moreover, Deliotte itself commented that the TMCH should transition from a closed to open and searchable DB with the understanding
that it is up to the ICANN Community to make the determination. I recall we had discussed some compromise positions that were being considered as a way to bring oversight while protecting against cybersquatters.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Accordingly, I request that we be prepared to continue the discussion on the merits of TMCH Question 7 and find a workable position as a WG to review the TMCH and avoid abuse.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jason</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> GNSO-RPM-WG <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Julie Hedlund<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 20, 2020 10:20 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Dear RPM WG members, </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As a reminder, p<span style="color:black">lease find the </span>
updated <span style="color:black">proposed agenda and materials below for the <b>
<i><u>full WG</u></i></b> meeting </span><b>Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes.</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kind regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mary, Ariel, and Julie</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; color:black">From: </span>
</b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; color:black">GNSO-RPM-WG <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org" target="_blank">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 3:10 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Dear RPM WG members, </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">P<span style="color:black">lease find the </span>updated <span style="color:black">
proposed agenda and materials below for the <b><i><u>full WG</u></i></b> meeting </span>
<b>Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes.</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Draft Proposed Agenda:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<ol start="1" type="1" style="margin-top:0cm">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Review Agenda and Updates to Statements of Interest</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Revisit Discussion of TMCH Proposals
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1QTt-5Fm5qdzoalRDcIUED01ur-2DyJgODCex8bj-5F-2DaKO7fI_edit-23gid-3D722865735&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=h-YCBbNQ0yFiF6hJviEdwDqUSzbkMEsFvHqD1z4Ix4A&s=71WyjyE0FtdOQ-oBUlPy1zQhKqCIXHZte-NxaS3p7BU&e=" target="_blank">
#4 [docs.google.com]</a> and <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1QTt-5Fm5qdzoalRDcIUED01ur-2DyJgODCex8bj-5F-2DaKO7fI_edit-23gid-3D1604477707&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=h-YCBbNQ0yFiF6hJviEdwDqUSzbkMEsFvHqD1z4Ix4A&s=X--O_xLLIbaYclLWQ4pesNriqcBfp-AOHvDXsW1FmDI&e=" target="_blank">
#5 [docs.google.com]</a>, see the Public Comment Review Tool at: <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QTt_m5qdzoalRDcIUED01ur-yJgODCex8bj_-aKO7fI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!sweUru0Zq__8MpVGAXJZqoIsAwrRgtO7K4ya1bssd0_iehbe0JkxZID5z67DJZ9YvzpJBRmKzw$" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QTt_m5qdzoalRDcIUED01ur-yJgODCex8bj_-aKO7fI/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]</a> and the table of contents on the first tab; see also the message on the email distribution list at:
<a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2020-July/004344.html" target="_blank">
[GNSO-RPM-WG] Simplified language to bring together individual TMCH #4 & #5 proposals </a><a name="m_2534361844928752888_4344"> </a> <i>Paul Tattersfield</i></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Review of Overarching Questions #1 and #3 (<i>skipping #2</i>) and Additional Overarching Questions #1, #2, and #3, see the Public Comment Review Tool at:
<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!sweUru0Zq__8MpVGAXJZqoIsAwrRgtO7K4ya1bssd0_iehbe0JkxZID5z67DJZ9YvzqIpK5g9w$" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]</a> and the table of contents on the first tab</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Review of General Content Questions #1 and #2 (time permitting), see the Public Comment Review Tool at:
<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!sweUru0Zq__8MpVGAXJZqoIsAwrRgtO7K4ya1bssd0_iehbe0JkxZID5z67DJZ9YvzqIpK5g9w$" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]</a> and the table of contents on the first tab</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">AOB</li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Best Regards,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Mary, Julie, Ariel</span></p>
<div id="gmail-m_2534361844928752888DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2">
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="1" cellpadding="0" style="border:none; border-top:solid #D3D4DE 1.0pt">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="58" style="width:41.25pt; border:none; padding:9.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding:0cm; text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="46" height="29" id="gmail-m_2534361844928752888_x005f_x0000_i1026" src="cid:image002.jpg@01D65F5B.3469F430" alt="Image removed by sender." style="width:.4791in; height:.302in"></span></a></p>
</td>
<td width="473" style="width:352.5pt; border:none; padding:9.0pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; color:#41424E">Virus-free.
<a href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank">
<span style="color:#4453EA">www.avg.com</span></a> </span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org" target="_blank">GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>