[Gnso-sc-budget] Travel Reports Now Meaningless, as Useful Data has been Redacted

[Stephanie Perrin]

I am inclined to think they are over-complying here, but that opinion is 
based on our own law which has a specific exemption for personal info 
when you are receiving a grant or benefit from the government....private 
sector is different.  I think they could make funding conditional on 
disclosure (so based on consent)....but there may be precedents in 
Europe to stop that kind of tied consent.  I think it is worth a try 
though.....

cheers SP

On 2018-08-08 12:43, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Yes, that’s correct Michele. We also no longer know the class of 
> travel that each supported traveler travelled in.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 18:19, Michele Neylon - Blacknight 
> <michele at blacknight.com <mailto:michele at blacknight.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So the names are listed but not the spend per person?
>>
>> Just the spend per "bucket"?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>>
>> Blacknight Solutions
>>
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>>
>> https://www.blacknight.com/
>>
>> http://blacknight.blog/
>>
>> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>>
>> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>>
>> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>>
>> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>>
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business 
>> Park,Sleaty
>>
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>>
>> *From: *Gnso-sc-budget <gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org> on behalf 
>> of Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> *Reply-To: *Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday 8 August 2018 at 15:56
>> *To: *"gnso-sc-budget at icann.org" <gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[Gnso-sc-budget] Travel Reports Now Meaningless, as Useful 
>> Data has been Redacted
>>
>> Sharing this for information purposes, and because it may be of 
>> interest to subscribers of this list—
>>
>> The travel reports that ICANN org publishes are now meaningless, 
>> because all the relevant information has been redacted.
>>
>> The explanation that was provided for this change is as follows:
>>
>>     /In light of recent changes in privacy regulations/, /ICANN
>>     Travel Support is making enhancements to the Travel Reports that
>>     are published for every meeting for our funded travelers. Moving
>>     forward, ICANN will publish the overall cost per group and will
>>     be redacting the individual cost per traveler. This change will
>>     be reflected on ICANN62 Travel Report and subsequent reports
>>     moving forward. /
>>
>> Source: https://community.icann.org/display/trvlconstit/Travel+Report
>>
>> Presumably the ‘privacy regulations’ this refers to is the GDPR, 
>> which does not actually require that this data be redacted.
>>
>> Per page 19, it cost USD 24,804.03 to bring five NextGen Ambassadors 
>> to Panama, which at an average of $4,960 a traveler, was 
>> substantially more than the average cost per GNSO traveler (which was 
>> $2,518/traveler). Without additional data it is difficult to 
>> understand why the average cost was so much higher. Was it one 
>> traveler whose airfare was disproportionately expensive, or is it 
>> something more systematic?
>>
>> I would like to see the travel reports continue to be published in a 
>> way that is meaningful, while all of course compliant with the GDPR. 
>> If anyone has some suggestions as to how this issue could be taken 
>> forward, I would appreciate hearing from you.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
> Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180808/3cb93244/attachment.html>