[Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC]

Fri Aug 31 10:28:03 UTC 2018

Thanks for this input, Philippe.

We now have input from the ISPCP and the NCSG.

Do any other Stakeholder Groups/Constituences have any input they wish to share?

We can continue to receive feedback until this Monday close of business (in your time zone). This is to allow time to prepare our report and to share it on our mailing list in advance of our next call on Monday, 10 September.

Best wishes,

Ayden

> On 29 Aug 2018, at 11:48, philippe.fouquart at orange.com wrote:
>
> Ayden, All,
>
> The ISPCP supports the continuation of this committee. It is open to amendments to charter or representation as long as those do not affect/undermine/supersede the ability of the SG/Cs to provide their inputs in their own rights.
>
> Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
> From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 4:59 PM
> To: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-sc-budget] Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC]
>
> Dear all,
>
> We have our next call this Monday.
>
> At this time we have only received inputs from the NCSG on the below questions.
>
> As a matter of priority, can you please share your Stakeholder Group/Constituency’s input.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ayden
>
> On 14 Aug 2018, at 18:19, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reminder, Berry.
>
> I look forward to reading the input from the various Stakeholder Groups and/or Constituencies. As a reminder the questions are:
>
> - Should the SCBO continue to exist?
>
> - Does the charter need to be amended? If so, how?
>
> - Was there adequate representation from the Council?
>
> - Was participation from SG/C subject matter experts who were not Council members helpful?
>
> - Should the Council submit comments without objection or create a motion for adoption?
>
> - Should proposed comments be more precise?
>
> - Should collaboration with the CCNSO be established?
>
> - Was collaboration with ICANN’s Finance team useful and are changes required should the SCBO continue?
>
> - How do we better understand when the GNSO Council should be making comments vs. comments submitted from SGs/Cs and avoid overlap or competing positions?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
> On 14 Aug 2018, at 14:23, mail at berrycobb.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just a reminder that we will be meeting next Monday 20 August at 13:00 UTC to discuss input from your respective groups and incorporate into the draft report.  We have until 17 Sept. to complete the report and send to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
>
> Thank you.
>
> B
>
> Berry A. Cobb
>
> GNSO Policy Consultant
>
> @berrycobb
>
> From: Ayden Férdeline [mailto:icann at ferdeline.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 17:24
> To: mail at berrycobb.com
> Cc: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> Subject: Please discuss these questions with your SG/C [was: Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC]
>
> Hi, all-
>
> Firstly, thanks to Berry for this summary and for preparing a first draft of this report.
>
> On our call today we thought it prudent to take the questions in Section 1.4 back to our respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies for feedback. (I have copied and pasted the questions below, for easy reference.)
>
> Could you please consult with your part of the community, and bring any comments back to our mailing list by Monday, 13 August? We can then look over all of the comments and based upon your feedback I will draft up some common recommendations for your review with a view to submitting these, once finalised, to the GNSO Council.
>
> Our next call will be on Monday, 20 August and I hope we can spend this call wordsmithing those recommendations. Once the language is a bit more final, we should still have another two weeks left to accept edits or comments on our mailing list, ahead of the document submission deadline for the Council’s September meeting.
>
> Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding this path forward. Thanks!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
> ______________________________
>
> Questions to Consider
> In reviewing the SCBO’s activity, lessons learned, and potential changes to its charter, the following questions should be considered:
>
> - Should the SCBO continue to exist?
>
> - Does the charter need to be amended?  If so, how?
>
> - Was there adequate representation from the Council?
>
> - Was participation from SG/C subject matter experts who were not Council members helpful?
>
> - Should the Council submit comments without objection or create a motion for adoption?
>
> - Should proposed comments be more precise?
>
> - Should collaboration with the CCNSO be established?
>
> - Was collaboration with ICANN’s Finance team useful and are changes required should the SCBO continue?
>
> - How do we better understand when the GNSO Council should be making comments vs. comments submitted from SGs/Cs and avoid overlap or competing positions?
>
> On 30 Jul 2018, at 15:46, mail at berrycobb.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Please find attached the next version of the SCBO After Action Report.  The action from SCBO members and SMEs is take the questions back to their respective groups to solicit input and suggestions for converting the questions into statements and/or observations.  In parallel, Phillipe will collaborate with the CCNSO about a liaison relationship between the two groups.
>
> Thank you.
>
> B
>
> Berry A. Cobb
>
> GNSO Policy Consultant
>
> @berrycobb
>
> From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of mail at berrycobb.com
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2018 11:20
> To: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] Agenda - 30 July 2018 - SCBO Meeting - 13:00 UTC
>
> Hi All,
>
> Please find below our agenda for the 30 July 2018 SCBO call at 13:00 UTC.  The call is scheduled for 60 minutes.
>
> 1)      Administrative Matters
>
> a.       SOIs
>
> 2)      Review draft SCBO After Action Report
>
> 3)      AOB / Next meeting
>
> I attached a draft of the After Action Report for your review prior to the meeting.  Track changes are enabled should you have any suggested changes.  In chatting with Council leadership, consideration of the SCBO report will occur in September.  Therefore, we need to have this report completed by 17 September 2018 for the Motions and Documents deadline.
>
> Thank you.
>
> B
>
> Berry A. Cobb
>
> 720.839.5735
>
> mail at berrycobb.com
>
> @berrycobb
>
> <gnso-SCBO-after-action-report-v0.2.docx>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180831/ded3413d/attachment-0001.html>