[Gnso-sc-budget] [Ext] RE: Subsequent Rounds

Tue Feb 27 02:36:34 UTC 2018

Thanks Xavier

So just to clarify. The Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is discussing how future application processes would be funded, for example, through a cost-recovery model similar to the 2012 round, and as such that is part of the policy discussion that will result in a recommendation. However, I still don’t think that there would be any point in the process where the Working Group will need to work with the Board to identify necessary resources to support implementation, but perhaps I’m just being pedantic.

Donna

From: Xavier J. Calvez [mailto:xavier.calvez at icann.org]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:34 PM
To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>; Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>; Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>
Cc: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-sc-budget] Subsequent Rounds

Donna,
Thank you.
We meant by this statement, that the funding mechanism for the subsequent round will need to be determined along with the process of the subsequent round. In other words, the funding of the subsequent round is something that will need to be defined either as part of the policy, or as part of the policy implementation. It feels to me that it should be addressed as part of the policy.

Thank you.

Best,

Xavier

Xavier Calvez
ICANN – SVP & CFO
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094
Phone:   310-301-5838
Mobile:  805-312-0052
Fax:        310-957-2348

From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at team.neustar<mailto:Donna.Austin at team.neustar>>
Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:30 PM
To: Xavier Calvez <xavier.calvez at icann.org<mailto:xavier.calvez at icann.org>>, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com>>, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com<mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>>
Cc: "gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>" <gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-sc-budget] Subsequent Rounds

Hi Xavier

Apologies for coming to this late. I’ve just returned from two weeks leave.

Could you clarify the statement: The Working Group will need to work with the Board to identify necessary resources to support implementation.

I’m not confident that this is accurate because the WG provides recommendations to the Council for consideration. If the recommendations are approved by the Council they are in turn submitted to the Board for consideration and approval. I don’t believe there is a role for the WG to identify necessary resources, but perhaps there is another step in the process that I’ve overlooked, so your clarification would be helpful.

Thanks

Donna

From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Xavier J. Calvez
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:50 PM
To: Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com>>; Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com<mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>>
Cc: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-sc-budget] Subsequent Rounds

For your information on this topic, this is an extract of the Draft FY19 Operating Plan and budget, Document 2, Section 2.5.1, top of page 21:

“Implementation of gTLD subsequent procedures

The gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group is reviewing existing new gTLD policies to propose any changes or new policies for subsequent procedures. No resources are in the FY19 budget for this implementation work. The Working Group will need to work with the Board to identify necessary resources to support implementation. There are, however, resources planned in FY18 and FY19 to support the PDP Working Group.”

Thank you.

Best,

Xavier

Xavier Calvez
ICANN – SVP & CFO
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094
Phone:   310-301-5838
Mobile:  805-312-0052
Fax:        310-957-2348

From: Gnso-sc-budget <gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 5:55 PM
To: Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com<mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>>
Cc: "gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>" <gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-sc-budget] Subsequent Rounds

My two cents: it seems that it would be a good idea for our SubPro PDP WGs to be thinking creatively about how the next round could be self-funded.

Best wishes,

Heather

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com<mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>> wrote:
Agree with all.

Cheers
Martin

On 18 Feb 2018 8:10 pm, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Michele,

this seems a legitimate concern and we should get more clarification.

Best,

Rafik

2018-02-19 2:51 GMT+09:00 Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>>:
All

While the various stakeholder groups might include this in their own comments I thought it worthwhile raising this topic here as well.
As we all know there currently is a large and active PDP on Subsequent Rounds of new TLDs.
However as was raised with me the budget does not seem to fully reflect this ie. no monies appear to have been earmarked should that PDP reach its conclusion and a next round be announced.

Jeff Neuman shared the below with me and others and I am sharing it here with his permission:

"there is nothing in the next ICANN proposed budget that accounts for development or resources towards the next round of New gTLDs.  If we want the “next round” to begin in 2020, then surely the FY 2019 Budget which contains the initiatives for ICANN from July 2018 through June 2019 MUST contain some funds to start the prep work.  In fact, for the 2012 Round, the budgeting for that round began in FY 2008.  The reason it began in FY 2008 (prepared during FY 2007) is because it was originally assumed that that the opening of the round would be in FY 2010 (or late 2009).  That was the assumption because they knew they would get the GNSO’s final report in at the end of FY 2008.  See https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/adopted-budget-2007-06-29-en#_Toc170817093[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_unthemed-2Dpages_adopted-2Dbudget-2D2007-2D06-2D29-2Den-23-5FToc170817093&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=5kPYvC52mSx1S3WBbrhnDXc3VsdtT65nr48xpLt1y_I&s=WfQn9APivpFHVHcHqFKkqCFkddDqePSgLkWKxwedpps&e=>. "

Jeff indicates that the PDP would probably be done before the end of FY19 so the lack of budgeted resources naturally concerns him.

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com[blacknight.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.blacknight.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=5kPYvC52mSx1S3WBbrhnDXc3VsdtT65nr48xpLt1y_I&s=uaawqypF2mANatvQoOF4RY98iSl9qtgmo8W4U4jRqfg&e=>
https://blacknight.blog[blacknight.blog]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blacknight.blog&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=5kPYvC52mSx1S3WBbrhnDXc3VsdtT65nr48xpLt1y_I&s=D4SCdFR276-uGPrbhvJ_-5YQYgXiDZ_b7rVdY6p3Lb4&e=> /
http://ceo.hosting/[ceo.hosting]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ceo.hosting_&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=5kPYvC52mSx1S3WBbrhnDXc3VsdtT65nr48xpLt1y_I&s=cybz6foEsbmiNaeorvqjjbUx9SgzN38y-AGy4zvQDLk&e=>
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072<tel:%2B353%20%280%29%2059%20%209183072>
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090<tel:%2B353%20%280%2959%209183090>
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265
,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

_______________________________________________
Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dsc-2Dbudget&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=BwoBZtH4uuul5wXzjW7msy-2LJrwv35Ofc_s3D2u1Ws&s=BXLhBTSwCr8J87fnCu41KNe6z6MKIPL4K8KDjcEg-kc&e=>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dsc-2Dbudget&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=BwoBZtH4uuul5wXzjW7msy-2LJrwv35Ofc_s3D2u1Ws&s=BXLhBTSwCr8J87fnCu41KNe6z6MKIPL4K8KDjcEg-kc&e=>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dsc-2Dbudget&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=BwoBZtH4uuul5wXzjW7msy-2LJrwv35Ofc_s3D2u1Ws&s=BXLhBTSwCr8J87fnCu41KNe6z6MKIPL4K8KDjcEg-kc&e=>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180227/f625ab4d/attachment-0001.html>