[Gnso-sc-budget] Bullet point on GSE

[Stephanie Perrin]

I support the item the way it is.  I think it is a very fair criticism.

Stephanie

On 2018-03-04 16:39, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
> I agree with Dona on the need to not appear a stone-throwing body, but 
> the point is needed. Maybe we could just the last part were we claim 
> there is no documents, etc. and just leave the rest were we claim the 
> importance of having this activities closely analyzed.
>
> Cheers,
> Martín
>
>> On 2 Mar 2018, at 19:30, Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM 
>> <mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In relation to the following bullet point:
>>
>> /● The GNSO Council's Standing Committee has had detailed discussions 
>> about the resources allocated to global engagement activities, and 
>> found that there are many unanswered questions, some of which relate 
>> to the value proposition of these expenditures. The GNSO Council 
>> requests that ICANN review its global stakeholder engagement 
>> activities to ensure that they are all closely aligned with ICANN's 
>> mission, and assess how activities meet this criteria. We believe 
>> that there should be a particular focus on what tangible outcomes - 
>> both direct and indirect - have been derived from ICANN's 
>> participation or sponsorship of these events. We greatly appreciate 
>> that the larger Internet ecosystem has risks to ICANN's mission and 
>> activities. However, we strongly advise that the impact of many of 
>> ICANN's engagement activities is neither well understood, well 
>> documented, nor subject to the discipline of reliable metrics and 
>> performance measurement.//
>> /
>>
>> We have received the following comment from Donna Austin:
>>
>> /Is there a better way for us to make the point that moving forward 
>> it is important for ICANN to prioritise its budget to ICANN's core 
>> mission and activities, of which policy development is one. Throwing 
>> stones is not the best approach here.//
>> /
>>
>> In order to resolve this, *please can you indicate which of these 
>> options you support:
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *1. Support including the bullet point as-is.**
>> *
>> *2. Support revising the bullet point - and please provide 
>> alternative text.**
>> *
>> *3. Prefer that this bullet point not be included in our comment.**
>> *
>> *4. Abstain.**
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *Thank you.*
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
>> Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-sc-budget mailing list
> Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180304/762f6a10/attachment-0001.html>