[Gnso-sc-budget] [EXTERNAL] Re: [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget

[Austin, Donna]

Jimson, I think the missing word is ‘years’ if I recall correctly the comment from Erika.

From: Gnso-sc-budget [mailto:gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jimson Olufuye
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 8:21 AM
To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>; gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget

Hi Ayden et al,

Something is missing in this sentence after "...next two...":


  *   The GNSO Council understands that Reserve Fund replenishment is a current area of focus for the ICANN organization. We would like to see a plan developed over the course of the next two  (months or ???) which reviews all options for replenishing the fund in a sustainable way.
Could it be "next two months" that is anticipated or what?

Cheers,

JO
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget
From: "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com<mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>
Date: 3/6/18 5:47 pm
To: "gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>" <gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:gnso-sc-budget at icann.org>>
Dear all,

Just a friendly reminder that we need to send our comment on the FY19 Budget through to the Council mailing list today for evaluation and review.

Unless I hear any objections, I plan to send through the attached file (with track changes marked to 'accepted') in 3 hours time at 17:30 UTC.

I did a quick fact check and couldn't find where the $8.1 million figure originated from re: increase in personnel costs. Document #2, page 9 says $7.3 million, so I've adjusted this now - but I would appreciate it if someone could please double check this.

The other changes I made were largely grammatical, replacing "implantation" on page 3 with "implementation", and reverting one sentence regarding GSE to a previous draft of our comment (please see my email here<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_pipermail_gnso-2Dsc-2Dbudget_2018-2DMarch_000261.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=p2w3lXJYhYNaGniQpI3fXrKhPNJUeZUizP6E0QQQWWs&s=grAslBpRoqr0x8KHlNyOCnVk9WJiA8BDZJqzi5oL5Lo&e=>).

I have also flagged one edit on page 2, second bullet point of our specific comments. "SAs/Cs" was changed to "SGs/Cs". However "SGs/Cs" was the original language, and I believe the change to "SOs/Cs" originated from Marilyn. Marilyn could you please review this and kindly advise if this change to "SOs/Cs" was intentional? Thank you.

All - as a matter of priority could you please review the attached comment one last time and indicate if you have any concerns? Thank you very much.

Best wishes,

Ayden Férdeline
_______________________________________________ Gnso-sc-budget mailing list Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-sc-budget at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sc-budget
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180306/b0b8f939/attachment.html>