[Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget

[Marilyn Cade]

Ayden


I was a little confused, as I thought it was SOs/ACs.

If it was intended to be SGs/Constituencies, perhaps better to spell that out.


apologies if I added confusion.

Apologies to have missed the call due to weather and other issues in Washington, DC, /Falls Church, with electricity outages and tree falls.


I don't seem to be able to catch a break!


See many in PR.


M


________________________________
From: Gnso-sc-budget <gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 10:47 AM
To: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget

Dear all,

Just a friendly reminder that we need to send our comment on the FY19 Budget through to the Council mailing list today for evaluation and review.

Unless I hear any objections, I plan to send through the attached file (with track changes marked to 'accepted') in 3 hours time at 17:30 UTC.

I did a quick fact check and couldn't find where the $8.1 million figure originated from re: increase in personnel costs. Document #2, page 9 says $7.3 million, so I've adjusted this now - but I would appreciate it if someone could please double check this.

The other changes I made were largely grammatical, replacing "implantation" on page 3 with "implementation", and reverting one sentence regarding GSE to a previous draft of our comment (please see my email here<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgnso-sc-budget%2F2018-March%2F000261.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7951a006d5804565e40f08d58379a0b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636559481908041868&sdata=15PU%2BUAIE4MJcR4enVYfYNI9j5uS9IxX70rajtMEfP8%3D&reserved=0>).

I have also flagged one edit on page 2, second bullet point of our specific comments. "SAs/Cs" was changed to "SGs/Cs". However "SGs/Cs" was the original language, and I believe the change to "SOs/Cs" originated from Marilyn. Marilyn could you please review this and kindly advise if this change to "SOs/Cs" was intentional? Thank you.

All - as a matter of priority could you please review the attached comment one last time and indicate if you have any concerns? Thank you very much.

Best wishes,

Ayden Férdeline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180306/b9759bfe/attachment-0001.html>