[Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thank you for the clarification, Marilyn. I will ensure the text in the version sent to the Council momentarily refers to "Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies."

Best wishes,

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 6 March 2018 7:14 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Ayden
>
> I was a little confused, as I thought it was SOs/ACs.
>
> If it was intended to be SGs/Constituencies, perhaps better to spell that out.
>
> apologies if I added confusion.
>
> Apologies to have missed the call due to weather and other issues in Washington, DC, /Falls Church, with electricity outages and tree falls.
>
> I don't seem to be able to catch a break!
>
> See many in PR.
>
> M
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Gnso-sc-budget <gnso-sc-budget-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 10:47 AM
> To: gnso-sc-budget at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-sc-budget] [v.0.9.2] Please review urgently - draft Council comment on the Budget
>
> Dear all,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that we need to send our comment on the FY19 Budget through to the Council mailing list today for evaluation and review.
>
> Unless I hear any objections, I plan to send through the attached file (with track changes marked to 'accepted') in 3 hours time at 17:30 UTC.
>
> I did a quick fact check and couldn't find where the $8.1 million figure originated from re: increase in personnel costs. Document #2, page 9 says $7.3 million, so I've adjusted this now - but I would appreciate it if someone could please double check this.
>
> The other changes I made were largely grammatical, replacing "implantation" on page 3 with "implementation", and reverting one sentence regarding GSE to a previous draft of our comment ([please see my email here](https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgnso-sc-budget%2F2018-March%2F000261.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7951a006d5804565e40f08d58379a0b5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636559481908041868&sdata=15PU%2BUAIE4MJcR4enVYfYNI9j5uS9IxX70rajtMEfP8%3D&reserved=0)).
>
> I have also flagged one edit on page 2, second bullet point of our specific comments. "SAs/Cs" was changed to "SGs/Cs". However "SGs/Cs" was the original language, and I believe the change to "SOs/Cs" originated from Marilyn. Marilyn could you please review this and kindly advise if this change to "SOs/Cs" was intentional? Thank you.
>
> All - as a matter of priority could you please review the attached comment one last time and indicate if you have any concerns? Thank you very much.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-sc-budget/attachments/20180306/0da8d76c/attachment.html>