[Gnso-ssc] For your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options

[Poncelet Ileleji]

Hello Marika,

I will go now with the majority on Option 1 so we have a consensus.

Kind Regards

Poncelet

On 3 April 2017 at 13:16, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:

> All, so far the feedback is as follows:
>
>
>
> Preference for option 1: Julf, Frederick, Renata
>
> Preference for option 2: Poncelet
>
>
>
> Can you please weigh in as soon as possible so we are able to launch the
> survey with sufficient time before the next meeting? We will also need your
> feedback concerning how the results are shared. Renate has already
> indicated that she prefers the survey results, including individual
> responses to be shared publicly.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <
> marika.konings at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 20:20
> *To: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-ssc] For your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Following on from the call today, staff has gone ahead and created two
> (for now) possible approaches for a survey to review the candidates for the
> RDS Review Team:
>
>
>
> ·         Option 1 – See https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=
> 0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid_2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K[
> surveymonkey.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid-5F2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2zNUmJODrxcFaE9ZlN-Gx2Ku8s1bE0nCPqcUT4GYQ74&s=Q8Nn4WU6CuYLmVysl8yVLg-C6A5t4pLc9_hCNvZvwAc&e=>
> for a preview. This is a very straightforward approach which first asks two
> questions in relation to whether the candidate qualifies as a GNSO
> candidate (yes/no-don’t know) and whether the candidate has the necessary
> expertise and competence (yes/no-don’t know), followed by a ranking of the
> candidates. This approach is similar to the one used by the volunteers that
> reviewed the SSR2-RT candidates.
>
> ·         Option 2 – See https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=
> 3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0_2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ[
> surveymonkey.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0-5F2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2zNUmJODrxcFaE9ZlN-Gx2Ku8s1bE0nCPqcUT4GYQ74&s=wPB5kUKuUiCZj5IX0W24JOGRccTZsjw8FU76kLhm6TQ&e=>
> for a preview. This survey goes into a bit more detail as it asks to rank
> the candidates based on how the meet 1) the skills and expertise as
> outlined in the call for volunteers, and 2) the desired attributes as
> outlined in the call for volunteers. This option could be further refined
> by asking a ranking for each individual skill / expertise and/or desired
> attribute, but that would make the survey significantly longer and would
> also take you more time to complete. The aggregated score could be used to
> obtain an overall ranking based on the responses from all.
>
>
>
> Note that these two options are in preview mode – any responses will not
> be recorded.
>
>
>
> Please share with the list which approach has your preference and/or which
> modifications or alternative approaches should be added to this list of
> options.
>
>
>
> Once the SSC has agreed on an approach, you will also need to decide
> whether you intend to share the individual survey responses with the SSC or
> only the aggregated results as well as whether you intend to share these
> publicly. As noted on the call today, the charter foresees that “To
> facilitate its deliberations, the SSC may decide to conduct some or all of
> its deliberations in private, but if so, it is expected to provide a
> rationale with its recommendations”.
>
>
>
> We would like to ask you to share your feedback as soon as possible so
> that ideally the survey will be launched early next week to allow for
> review and discussion of the results during next week’s meeting (please
> remember to fill out the doodle poll that has been circulated by Nathalie).
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> P.S. You will also find attached the updated summary document which now
> includes a column for gender.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>



-- 
Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
Coordinator
The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
MDI Road Kanifing South
P. O. Box 421 Banjul
The Gambia, West Africa
Tel: (220) 4370240
Fax:(220) 4390793
Cell:(220) 9912508
Skype: pons_utd






*www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/
<http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org
<http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org
<http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
<http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20170403/2d18e5e5/attachment.html>