[Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Mon Jan 29 18:57:09 UTC 2018

Yes, that will be good.


Em 29 de jan de 2018 2:29 PM, "Emily Barabas" <emily.barabas at icann.org>

Hi Renata,

Thanks for your question.

For the moment, the poll is only open to test, so that you can provide
feedback on the format. The deadline to suggest changes to the format is
tomorrow (Tuesday 30 January) at 11:00 UTC.

After that deadline, I will send another email letting everyone know that
the poll is open for voting. Typically, we give a deadline of one week from
the opening of the poll, so the deadline would be Tuesday 6 February. Will
that allow you enough time following the NCPH Intersessional?

Kind regards,


*From: *Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
*Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:24
*To: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
*Cc: *Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg at safebrands.com>, "
gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
*Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation -


So the open poll is already the final poll and we can vote on it?

What is the deadline please?

And possible to postpone it for 1 week after NCPH intersessional?


On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>

Hi Frederic,

Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to:

I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page
was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC
conducted in Summer 2017.

In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates:
Rao Naveed Bin
Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who
is currently serving on the SSR2-RT.

Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in
the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time.

Kind regards,


*From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric
Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg at safebrands.com>
*Organization: *SafeBrands
*Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09
*To: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
*Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT

Hello  All,

Sorry, i might have read something wrong.

But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on
the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others.
Did i miss something ?

Otherwise, this is very accurate.

Best regards


Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit :


Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> escribió:


I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me.



On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi"
<susankpolicy at gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com>
<susankpolicy at gmail.com>> wrote:

  I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am
fine with it.

Thanks for setting it up.

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas
<emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>
<emily.barabas at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear SSC members,

It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use
the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this
was previously the case with this mode.

To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it.
Please use this link:
I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes,
so feel free to submit “test” answers.

Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30
January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me

Kind regards,


From: Emily Barabas
<emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>
<emily.barabas at icann.org>>

Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51

To: "gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>
<gnso-ssc at icann.org>" <gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>
<gnso-ssc at icann.org>>

Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT

Dear SSC members,

Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a
draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on
attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a
preview of the draft poll here:

Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to
test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest
changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00
UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.

Kind regards,


From: Emily Barabas
<emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>
<emily.barabas at icann.org>>

Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08

To: "gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>
<gnso-ssc at icann.org>" <gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>
<gnso-ssc at icann.org>>

Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018

Dear SSC members,

Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our
meeting today.  These high-level notes are designed to help WG members
navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a
substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the
wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org]

For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are
attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document
to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency
section on page 4.

Kind regards,



Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing
skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills

Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter
and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency
section on page 4.

Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting,
planned for the second week of February.


1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates

- no SOI updates

2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills
produced by existing SSR2-RT members

- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining
candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the
existing SSR-RT candidates.

- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear
to be any category that is an obvious gap.

- The candidates have distinct skill sets.

- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in
filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group
reviews and refines this analysis.

- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.

- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier
this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is
less granular.

- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills
matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a
selection assignment.

- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).

3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter

- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter
based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the
previous call.

>From the chat:

Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too

Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation
is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to
report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and

Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views

- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views,
should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).

- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a
challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the
Council has made a decision.

- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call
recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this
information later.

- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure
timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO
Council of its recommendation.

>From the chat:

Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private

Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it

Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either
we have full transparency or not.

Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records

Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed
output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC

Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement

Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok

Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)

Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications
and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?

Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is
both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer
section of such messages

- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is
notifying candidates in a timely manner.

- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC
to candidates with disclaimer text.

4. AOB

- none

Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist

ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

Email: emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>
<emily.barabas at icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
<+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> <+31%206%2084507976>


Gnso-ssc mailing list

Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org> <Gnso-ssc at icann.org>



Gnso-ssc mailing list

Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org> <Gnso-ssc at icann.org>



Gnso-ssc mailing list

Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org> <Gnso-ssc at icann.org>



El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido
únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que
puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por
favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y
elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al
mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o
copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las
específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido
emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información

This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform
the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as
the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any
person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited.
ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without
respecting our Information Security Policy.


Gnso-ssc mailing list

Gnso-ssc at icann.org



[image: photo]


[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png]
 [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png]

Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

: +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>

: +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>

: +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>

https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png]fg at safebrands.com



Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France


N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie
professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors
des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.

Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20180129/aa993f82/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Gnso-ssc mailing list