[gtld-tech] .DESI to Be Placed in the Emergency Back-end Registry Operator Program

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Pardon my ignorance, but would such a roll at transfer not require the
collaboration of the losing Registry?

el


On 2023-10-20 05:51, Viktor Dukhovni via gtld-tech wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:40:12PM -0700, Wes Hardaker via gtld-tech wrote:
[...]
> Indeed, a potential outage during a botched rollover needs to be one of
> the transition plan considerations.
> 
> But I think there's a case for at least seriously considering, and at
> the appropriate opportunity, at least once, practicing, a more graceful
> transition in the case of a TLD, some of whose delegated zones could
> alternatively be unwitting casualties of DNSSEC being turned off (they
> may have operational dependencies on DNSSEC being available).
> 
> The question at hand is whether this was a plausible opportunity.
> Perhaps not this time, but ideally before an emergency operator change
> is required for a more critical TLD???
> 

-- 
Eberhard W. Lisse     \         /Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (retired)
el at lisse.NA           / *      |     Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht\      /     If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia         ;____/    Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply