[GTLD-WG] Fwd: [council] Update from the New gTLD Program Committee
evan at telly.org
Wed Nov 28 14:56:11 UTC 2012
Most relevant to me in the Board's letter to the GNSO:
*"The Committee adopted both resolutions at this time in deference to
geopolitical concerns and specific GAC advice, to reassure the impacted
stakeholders in the community, acknowledge and encourage the continuing
work of the GNSO Council, and take an action consistent with its 13
September 2012 resolution."*
Looks like the Board has made up its mind, and the deck is stacked against
sanity. We can still do advice as ALAC, but I wonder how much value exists
in the ongoing GNSO WG work...
On 28 November 2012 09:46, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> I think that what this is saying is the Board New gTLD Program Committee
> on Monday approved temporary reservations for RC, IOC and some unknown
> subset of IGOs. This would make the resubmitted GNSO motion regarding
> RC/IOC no longer relevant.
> From: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com**>
>> To: <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Subject: [council] Update from the New gTLD Program Committee
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:50:16 +0000
>> Thread-Index: Ac3NUmnnhSOKAw26S0eLreaaNZM8VQ**==
>> Sender: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Cherine Chalaby, Chair of the New gTLD Program Committee, has asked me to
>> forward to you, a letter providing an update on their most recent (26
>> November 2012) meeting.
>> I have also attached an information update I provided to the New gTLD
>> Program Committee immediately ahead of their 26 November meeting.
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Working Group direct URL:
Em: evan at telly dot org
More information about the GTLD-WG