[GTLD-WG] [CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] DRAFT ALAC EPDP Advice

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 16:53:27 UTC 2019

Thick WHOIS made sense back then - and some of us were savaged for taking
that position! - and still does today, if only because if every GTLD
operator has the same obligations it is easier to check compliance.

The distinction between legal and natural persons and why that would matter
is, um, well, I am loathe to commit 2 more brain cells to that argument.

The wave and momentum of national data privacy law and regulations is
tacking the EU way. So in the final analysis a geographic distinction has
no long term value.

Do we have a new solution to offer anywhere?

And why does this 'advise the Board request/require' sound so much like we
got popped in the mouth in the schoolyard and ran to teacher for justice?

A better posture is to make the arguments we favour sharper and put them on
the wire for the WG to see.

Orchestrate and manufacture consent!


On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 8:59 am Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>

> Please find attached a draft of the ALAC Advice to the Board related to
> the EPDP.
> Note that the highlighting (inadvertantly missing in the third case) gives
> two alternative pheasings to be discussed.
> Hadia has reviewed it and supports it.
> Alan
> --
> Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-wg/attachments/20190404/03a55676/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the GTLD-WG mailing list