[GTLD-WG] [CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] Further Revised Draft Statement on .ORG Renewal

Cheryl Langdon-Orr langdonorr at gmail.com
Tue Apr 30 18:51:13 UTC 2019


Thanks Greg  I can certainly support this approach.

On Wed, May 1, 2019, 02:50 Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> A few responses to the various earlier emails.
>
> @Ricardo, Good point.  I think it makes sense to call for several studies
> over time, rather than a single study.
>
> @Olivier, My omission of your contribution was an oversight, not a
> conclusion that the view lacked support or was off-topic.  My apologies. I,
> for one, would be happy to add something on Registry fees to the draft.
> Please provide text or point me to the best iteration of your suggested
> text (which I missed, sadly).  Or I can take what is in Justine’s draft.
>
> Personally, I am not in favor of doing an economic study before removing
> the price cap.  As Jonathan notes, this work has already been done.  My
> thought was to have a study done in “real time,” based on observing the
> domain name market(s) after the caps were lifted, so that the effects could
> be accurately observed and analyzed, and used to inform future action.
> Predictive studies are by their nature speculative, and can more easily be
> bent in one direction or the other.. They tend to be more successful and
> reliable when the study structure and method is well-understood and
> time-tested (e.g., a pre-merger analysis).  A predictive study here may
> prove far less reliable and useful, given the number of variables and
> inputs and the novelty of the study.  I also think it’s an unrealistic
> request.  But as penholder, I will draft whatever the consensus becomes.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:11 PM Maureen Hilyard <
> maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, John. I think a consensus call on the document will be
>> required  from this session because the extension we requested closes soon
>> after and Evin has to prepare the doc for submission. We can do
>> ratification by the ALAC after the fact but a recorded consensus would be
>> helpful.
>>
>>
>> M
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:50 AM John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Maureen,
>>>
>>> In the event that you're not at tomorrow's meeting, do you want me to
>>> take any action on your behalf as vice chair?
>>>
>>> Sent from my Pixel 3XL
>>>
>>> John Laprise, Ph.D.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 9:59 AM Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like this version Greg .
>>>>
>>>> In case I can't make tomorrow's CPWG meeting.  I believe the new
>>>> version provides a good compromise of the different views that have been
>>>> presented by the CPWG discussants. I like the idea of an economic study as
>>>> well as Marita's suggestion to delay any change until the results of such a
>>>> study were revealed.
>>>> I also prefer putting the RAs under one umbrella statement. The
>>>> separate .asia statement reinforces support for the inclusion of UA.
>>>> Anything else that is relevant would be in the general ALAC RA statement.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 8:14 PM Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am attaching another, further revised draft public comment on the
>>>>> .ORG renewal, after sifting through the various recent conversations on the
>>>>> list.   I will try to circulate a redline in the morning, New York time,
>>>>> but can't right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought about including something on UA, but for .ORG and in the
>>>>> absence of proposed language, I did not see the obvious hook in this
>>>>> statement to bring that concept in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg Shatan
>>>>> greg at isoc-ny.org
>>>>> President, ISOC-NY
>>>>> *"The Internet is for everyone"*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CPWG mailing list
>>>>> CPWG at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CPWG mailing list
>>>> CPWG at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GTLD-WG mailing list
>> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>>
>> Working Group direct URL:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>
> --
> Greg Shatan
> greg at isoc-ny.org
> President, ISOC-NY
> *"The Internet is for everyone"*
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-wg/attachments/20190501/45f94f9e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the GTLD-WG mailing list