[GTLD-WG] [CPWG] [ALAC] HIT Topics for Marrakech

Holly Raiche h.raiche at internode.on.net
Thu May 9 10:32:15 UTC 2019


I am afraid I am an apology for this CPWG meeting - it’s too close to the ATLAS III meeting (meaning REALLY late evening Sydney time, then REALLY early Sydney time) - so I’ll check the transcript later

And staff, please a dial out for the ATLAS III meeting

Thanks

Holly

> On May 9, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Justine Chew <justine.chew at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> But, doesn't the follow-up by the Board on its reaction to the CCTRT fall under 3. Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations?
> 
> Justine
> -----
> 
> On Thu, 9 May 2019, 08:03 Holly Raiche, <h.raiche at internode.on.net <mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>> wrote:
> I’m with Ed - #3
> 
> Holly
> 
>> On May 9, 2019, at 12:48 AM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Eliminate #3: Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations 
>> 
>> -ed
>> 
>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:12 AM Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com <mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>> 
>> Thank you all for the contributions and discussions that arose out of this request for topics for the HIT/CC sessions in Marrakech.  
>> 
>> 1. The first issue was the consolidated approach that was proposed by Keith and there were four areas that were suggested and accepted by 8 respondents initially
>> 
>> 2. Then after Sebastian suggested DoH there were 15 respondents who agreed to include DoH adding their reasons to Sebastian's "because it is important to end-users and important to keep the Internet open to all".
>> 
>> So from the email discussions, the suggestions are:
>> 1. DOH
>> 2. Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance
>> 3. Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations 
>> 4. UA
>> 5. Combined EPDP2, GDPR, Who is accuracy and Unified Access Model
>> 
>> Something to discuss in the CPWG meeting is that if the SO-ACs decide on only 4 sessions, which one would you remove?  Also we will need talking points on their final list.
>> 
>> Maureen
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>> 
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
>> 
>> -- 
>> NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-wg/attachments/20190509/bd67a2b3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the GTLD-WG mailing list