[GTLD-WG] [CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] [ALAC] HIT Topics for Marrakech

Maureen Hilyard maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
Sun May 12 06:26:18 UTC 2019


Then are you saying that one of the policy sessions we have in Marrakech
should be to discuss and develop an ALAC statement for the public comment?

On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 7:43 PM Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
wrote:

> I agree - surprisingly - with both Justine and Olivier.
>
> If you look at the Issues Page (the link one is instructed to use to
> provide comments), and the many comments quoted made about the challenges
> in participating  - many of which we have made ( time constraints, same
> people commenting, complexity of issues - pages that feel like someone has
> been listening in on ALAC conversations) then we need a process to respond
> to this, and so far, no comments have been made either on the ALAC policy
> page or the Issues Page.  So yes, this is ALAC’s opportunity both to set
> out our myriad difficulties in responding - and constructive suggestions.
> We can do this on our own policy page - and then AS ALAC - add comments to
> the Issues Page (as we are instructed to do), or individuals can go
> straight to the Issues Page and make their own comments.  Either way, this
> is a issue ALAC has been talking about for ages and we need to at least
> agree on how to respond.  So maybe we need to schedule something in
> Marrakech where we can coordinate a response to the issue - or at least
> respond via the policy page.
>
> Holly
>
> On May 11, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Justine,
>
> On 09/05/2019 14:27, Justine Chew wrote:
>
> I would say NOT #3 Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and
> implementation because UNLESS the goal for topic has changed substantially
> (and if someone can confirm this or otherwise) this topic has been
> suggested by ICANN Org in response to the request made by Jonathan Zuck at
> ICANN 64 in respect of the Board's reaction to the CCTRT Final Report
> recommendations. I think we should back Jonathan up on this, and it's an
> important CC topic.
>
>
> But doesn't this do double duty with the policy commenting on:
> https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg ?
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-wg/attachments/20190511/17381dd0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the GTLD-WG mailing list