[IANAtransition] Can we refocus the discussion? (Was re: The ONLY IANA Registry that Really Matters is the IPv4 Address Space)

Jordan Carter jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Sun Apr 20 03:01:53 UTC 2014

> On 19/04/2014, at 11:39 pm, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:
> From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> As it's been mentioned on other lists, it seem that this list is going
>> beyond commenting on the ICANN proposed transition process.
>> I agree I also have been distracted. ;)
>> Could we kindly refocus our energy on the main purpose of this list. Which
>> is to comment on the ICANN proposed transitioning process, time is ticking
> At this point I tend to believe IANA should just become an ICANN
> function with some sort of straightforwad oversight and accountability
> structure.

Barry, did you have a view on whether icann's proposed process and
mechanisms will provide a path to your (currently?) preferred outcome?

Also on whether a scope for the process that only allows your outcome
is viable or reasonable?



More information about the ianatransition mailing list