[IANAtransition] ccNSO Council Comment

David Conrad drc at virtualized.org
Mon May 5 17:13:28 UTC 2014


On May 5, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> Regarding the ICANN-proposed “steering group,” both the IETF and the ccNSO have called for major modifications in it. IETF, like me and many others, has rejected the whole idea that the group should be “steering” the transition, and ccNSO has called for more direct representation. The problem is that many of us still fear that ICANN is “stacking the deck” in its approach to both the transition and the composition of the steering committee.

Out of curiosity, given (as I understand it) the formation of the steering group is modeled on how the ATRT is formed, do you feel the ATRT is stacking the deck too?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ianatransition/attachments/20140505/767b3efa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ianatransition/attachments/20140505/767b3efa/signature.asc>

More information about the ianatransition mailing list