[IANAtransition] Input from the Government of India
isolatedn at gmail.com
Thu May 8 15:03:35 UTC 2014
I have called for quick inputs from Members of Internet Society India
Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
> Please see embedded comments below.
> Thanks and best,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ianatransition-bounces at icann.org
> > [mailto:ianatransition-bounces at icann.org]On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> > Sent: jeudi, 8. mai 2014 01:06
> > To: Seun Ojedeji
> > Cc: ianatransition at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [IANAtransition] Input from the Government of India
> > On 08/05/2014 06:45, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > > Hello Ergys,
> > >
> > > - I oppose a legislative oversight in this process (which will
> > require some
> > > level of government making decision, besides it's against requirement)
> > I agree. Whatever "proper international legislative authority"
> > really means,
> > it is not necessary: the Internet has succeeded brilliantly without it,
> Yes, but mobile has grown faster, even though mobile is governed more
> traditionally. Internet has had a very significant impact in developed
> countries, but mobile has probably had a greater impact (at least to date)
> in developing countries.
> > so this is an experimental observation,
> The current Internet governance arrangements have not been able to address
> to everyone's satisfaction the three priority issues identified in 2004,
> namely the asymmetric role of the US government, relatively higher costs
> developing countries, and security (which at the time included spam and now
> also includes mass surveillance). As a result, Internet governance
> discussions have continued for 10 years in a variety of forums, and there
> no end in sight.
> How come we don't discuss GSM governance (apart from specific issues such
> termination rates or roaming or frequency auctions)?
> > not an opinion.
> I beg to differ. Some believe that the current Internet governance
> arrangements have favored (or at least not prevented) trends that are
> problematic, see the first part of the Just Net Coalition Delhi Declaration
> >And while one can
> > hardly be against the principle of representative democracy for
> > countries, running it on a global scale with several billion voters is
> > not an option.
> Well, it does seem to work at least to some extent in some areas such as
> maritime and air transport.
> But I do agree that it does not work in other areas, such as climate change
> >So we arrive at the multi-stakeholder approach, which
> > essentially excludes traditional legislative authority as a solution.
> And in effect hands things over either to a small group of technologists or
> to private companies. But only for certain issues, because copyright,
> defamation, etc. continue to be handled by traditional governance
> mechanisms. And does not, at least at present, exclude the impact of US
> legislation and US executive branch actions.
> > > - Following the Tunis agenda is not acceptable.
> The Tunis Agenda is a long and complex document. Could you specify more
> precisly which parts of it you consider to be unacceptable?
> > Certainly not; that is one of the good things about the NETmundial
> > result, after all.
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. The Netmundial outcome reaffirmed the
> roles and responsibilities outlined in the Tunis Agenda, even as it called
> for flexible application of those roles and responsibilies. See the Just
> Net Coalition statement regarding Netmundial at:
> > Brian Carpenter
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > sent from Google nexus 4
> > > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> > > On 7 May 2014 19:14, "Ergys Ramaj" <ergys.ramaj at icann.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Attached.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> ianatransition mailing list
> > >> ianatransition at icann.org
> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ianatransition
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ianatransition mailing list
> > > ianatransition at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ianatransition
> > _______________________________________________
> > ianatransition mailing list
> > ianatransition at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ianatransition
> ianatransition mailing list
> ianatransition at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ianatransition