[ianatransition] Composition of the ICG

John Curran jcurran at istaff.org
Tue Jul 29 13:52:06 UTC 2014

On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Michel S. Gauthier <mg at telepresse.com> wrote:

> At 14:37 29/07/2014, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> There is a reason for that. It coordinates the allocation of IP addresses via the Regional Internet Registries.
> Vint,
> this is something which came along with the US Arpanet global internetting paid by the USG. This is what many states, corporates and people want to get rid of.

jfc/mg - 

Could you please clarify - in the above, "This" (that you assert folks want to get rid of) 
refers to: 

1) the overall US oversight model of the IANA provided by the present NTIA contract, or
2) not the US oversight, but the actual community-based Internet identifier 
   coordination system itself (consisting of IETF, IANA, ICANN, RIRs)?


Disclaimer: my views alone.

More information about the ianatransition mailing list