[ianatransition] Composition of the ICG
jcurran at istaff.org
Tue Jul 29 13:52:06 UTC 2014
On Jul 29, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Michel S. Gauthier <mg at telepresse.com> wrote:
> At 14:37 29/07/2014, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> There is a reason for that. It coordinates the allocation of IP addresses via the Regional Internet Registries.
> this is something which came along with the US Arpanet global internetting paid by the USG. This is what many states, corporates and people want to get rid of.
Could you please clarify - in the above, "This" (that you assert folks want to get rid of)
1) the overall US oversight model of the IANA provided by the present NTIA contract, or
2) not the US oversight, but the actual community-based Internet identifier
coordination system itself (consisting of IETF, IANA, ICANN, RIRs)?
Disclaimer: my views alone.
More information about the ianatransition