[ICANN Academy WG] Pilot leadership training in Toronto - decision on the dates
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Tue Aug 28 09:41:57 UTC 2012
Hi Sandra,
My suggestion was and is that this be included as one of the choices the WG is presented. I do not know what level of participation and decision/recommendation making we are being granted by ICANN staff, but it seems there is at-least enough support for this possibility to be included it in the poll you are planning.
avri
On 28 Aug 2012, at 01:53, sandra hoferichter wrote:
> Hi Avri, postpone the programme would be that last option only, which I put not as an option yet. Taking into consideration the NomCom selections and the new CEO participation, I still see some very good reasons to go for Toronto. The Autumn meeting was not proposed just by chance. Furthermore I believe we can get things done, now that we are in the dialogue.
>
> Best Sandra
>
> (Note: This message was send from my iPhone - I do apologise for any misspelling.)
>
> Am 28.08.2012 um 01:01 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>:
>
>> Considering how late it is before the Toronto meetings, this is worth considering. At the same time, I personally will contribute however possible to do what needs to be done if we keep the Toronto target.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> [mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-
>>> lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 6:20 PM
>>> To: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Pilot leadership training in Toronto -
>>> decision on the dates
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> other ideas.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible/reasonable to add the option of postponing the
>>> leadership training from Toronto to a later time when a properly
>>> constituted plan can be considered?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Aug 2012, at 17:00, sandra hoferichter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> thank you again for the valuable comments which has been posted on
>>> this list. I did not respond to everyone, but they should all feed into
>>> the further discussion and the final curriculum.
>>>>
>>>> Coming back to one of Filiz' earlier email I like to draw your
>>> attention to the following question and ask you kindly to express your
>>> opinion in a doodle.
>>>>
>>>> Due to the time conflicts for some assigned participants, we like to
>>> get a clearer picture about the duration of the leadership training in
>>> Toronto.
>>>>
>>>> I propose 3 options and ask all WG members*** to choose, what do you
>>>> think is the most appropriate solution. Feel free to consider also
>>> the
>>>> feedback of your SO / AC / SG chair whilst making the choice
>>>> here:http://www.doodle.com/4c4fa7dehuaksckx
>>>>
>>>> *** For group balancing reasons I ask the recent ALAC programme
>>> committee members (Avri, Tijani, Sala, Carlos) only to reply on the
>>> doodle.
>>>>
>>>> The options are:
>>>>
>>>> 1. A one day orientation programme on Fri, 12th October à this
>>> will avoid time conflicts, especially for the GNSO, board and current
>>> chairs.
>>>> 2. A two day programme on Fri, 12th - Sat 13th Octà taking
>>> into account that not everybody can participate on the 2ndday
>>>> 3. An adapted 2 day programme on Fri, 12th - Sat 13th Oct à to
>>> cover the needs for two (slightly different) target groups, on the
>>> first and on the second day. The two target groups are IMHO: current
>>> chairs and experienced leaders on the one hand, prospective and
>>> incoming chairs and leaders on the other hand.
>>>>
>>>> Please note: this is not a vote following the ICANN bylaws, the
>>> purpose is to get a feedback on a certain issue. The doodle will be
>>> open until Thursday 30th August 2012.
>>>>
>>>> Once we have a clear idea on this, we should set up a drafting team
>>> to create a curriculum for the programme. I ask you already herewith to
>>> volunteer for this drafting team and hope we can pick up most of the
>>> comments made by the WG members.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the cooperation and please let me know if you have
>>> questions or other ideas.
>>>>
>>>> Best Sandra
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
>>>> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-
>>> wg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list at-large-icann-academy-
>>> ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
>> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg
>
More information about the icann-academy-wg
mailing list