[ICANN-CSC] Change procedures

[Jay Daley]

> Just to clarify, the charter review team is only involved with the establishment and approval of the principles? And then going forward, the charter review team does not provide input or is not responsible for seeking approval for proposed changes under those principles? 
> Is it accurate to say the proposal is a one time effort by the charter review team, unless we later want to modify the principles later?

Yes that’s correct Elaine.

Jay

> 
> Elaine
> 
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> The sub-group of Kal and I just had a call with Sam Eisner, Trang, Bart and Ria to discuss the SLA change procedures.
> 
> It is our view that the way forward is
> 
> - We ask the CSC Charter Review team to include in the charter a set of delegations (or principles) that the ccNSO and GNSO give to their members.  These might include
>         "the members may agree SLA changes that they believe have only minor customer impact, direct with PTI"
>         "the members must seek approval from the ccNSO and GNSO for any SLA changes that will have a non-minor impact on customers"
>         "the members may agree an SLA change that is of minor or moderate impact if they have publicly consulted with their respective communities and received no strong objections"
> 
> - They CSC Charter Review team then takes responsibility for consulting with the community on these changes
> 
> - Once a set of delegations is agreed through the CSC Charter Review team, the CSC would then draft up and publish a set of change procedures that it believes are in line with those principles.  These procedures are "owned" by the CSC and do not require approval to change (i.e. they are separate from the Charter).
> 
> 
> It is felt that this approach
> 
> a) changes the Charter at an appropriately high level
> b) the change procedures can be changed without a charter change
> c) avoids consultation fatigue by having it all part of the charter review
> d) should deliver a result that sees us having a consultation path that is proportionate to the changes proposed
> 
> 
> If you are happy with that approach then the next step would be for me to draft a note to the CSC Charter Review team for us to discuss and sign off at our next call.
> 
> Please let me know your thoughts.
> 
> Jay
> 
> --
> Jay Daley
> Chief Executive
> NZRS Ltd
> desk: +64 4 931 6977
> mobile: +64 21 678840
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ICANN-CSC mailing list
> ICANN-CSC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-csc
> 


-- 
Jay Daley
Chief Executive
NZRS Ltd
desk: +64 4 931 6977
mobile: +64 21 678840
linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley