[ICANN-CSC] [EXTERNAL] Re: Change procedures

[Feher, Kal]

I mentioned this on the call, but repeating here on list that I'm fine
with this approach.

--
Kal Feher
Neustar Inc.
Melbourne, Australia





On 5/12/17, 06:29, "ICANN-CSC on behalf of Jay Daley"
<icann-csc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:

>
>> Just to clarify, the charter review team is only involved with the
>>establishment and approval of the principles? And then going forward,
>>the charter review team does not provide input or is not responsible for
>>seeking approval for proposed changes under those principles?
>> Is it accurate to say the proposal is a one time effort by the charter
>>review team, unless we later want to modify the principles later?
>
>Yes that¹s correct Elaine.
>
>Jay
>
>> 
>> Elaine
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> The sub-group of Kal and I just had a call with Sam Eisner, Trang, Bart
>>and Ria to discuss the SLA change procedures.
>> 
>> It is our view that the way forward is
>> 
>> - We ask the CSC Charter Review team to include in the charter a set of
>>delegations (or principles) that the ccNSO and GNSO give to their
>>members.  These might include
>>         "the members may agree SLA changes that they believe have only
>>minor customer impact, direct with PTI"
>>         "the members must seek approval from the ccNSO and GNSO for any
>>SLA changes that will have a non-minor impact on customers"
>>         "the members may agree an SLA change that is of minor or
>>moderate impact if they have publicly consulted with their respective
>>communities and received no strong objections"
>> 
>> - They CSC Charter Review team then takes responsibility for consulting
>>with the community on these changes
>> 
>> - Once a set of delegations is agreed through the CSC Charter Review
>>team, the CSC would then draft up and publish a set of change procedures
>>that it believes are in line with those principles.  These procedures
>>are "owned" by the CSC and do not require approval to change (i.e. they
>>are separate from the Charter).
>> 
>> 
>> It is felt that this approach
>> 
>> a) changes the Charter at an appropriately high level
>> b) the change procedures can be changed without a charter change
>> c) avoids consultation fatigue by having it all part of the charter
>>review
>> d) should deliver a result that sees us having a consultation path that
>>is proportionate to the changes proposed
>> 
>> 
>> If you are happy with that approach then the next step would be for me
>>to draft a note to the CSC Charter Review team for us to discuss and
>>sign off at our next call.
>> 
>> Please let me know your thoughts.
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>> --
>> Jay Daley
>> Chief Executive
>> NZRS Ltd
>> desk: +64 4 931 6977
>> mobile: +64 21 678840
>> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ICANN-CSC mailing list
>> ICANN-CSC at icann.org
>> 
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman
>>_listinfo_icann-2Dcsc&d=DwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbV
>>x0VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=CzMCxB3IsM5xoTFypNXv-d1ciEKpjx2WSQP3F1KsaS
>>Q&s=hhpWqltrZxLIKx9H8XNZ0qBZNFR9tzvgQcTV4xicXAM&e=
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>Jay Daley
>Chief Executive
>NZRS Ltd
>desk: +64 4 931 6977
>mobile: +64 21 678840
>linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
>
>_______________________________________________
>ICANN-CSC mailing list
>ICANN-CSC at icann.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
>listinfo_icann-2Dcsc&d=DwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=r-Nirn4kOYGkwbVx0
>VsP9wXIoGGzhrrchbSexWZfRoA&m=CzMCxB3IsM5xoTFypNXv-d1ciEKpjx2WSQP3F1KsaSQ&s
>=hhpWqltrZxLIKx9H8XNZ0qBZNFR9tzvgQcTV4xicXAM&e=