[ICANN-CSC] [Ext] Draft February 2017 CSC Report
Elaine Pruis
elaine at donuts.email
Wed Mar 15 08:12:35 UTC 2017
Looks good to me.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:09 AM Byron Holland <byron.holland at cira.ca> wrote:
> Thanks Jay/Trang.
>
> Looks good.
>
> Byron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icann-csc-bounces at icann.org [mailto:icann-csc-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Trang Nguyen
> Sent: March 15, 2017 3:09 AM
> To: Jay Daley
> Cc: ICANN-CSC at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ICANN-CSC] [Ext] Draft February 2017 CSC Report
>
> Thanks, Jay! I’ve attached a revised report that includes this change.
> I’ve attached both a redline and a clean version.
>
> Best,
>
> Trang
>
> On 3/15/17, 7:13 AM, "Jay Daley" <jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
>
> I’m happy with that. Thank you.
>
> > On 14/03/2017, at 6:43 PM, Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Jay, All,
> >
> > May I suggest a revision to the new addition that you suggested? The
> reason being that I don’t think we should completely close the door on this
> topic. The Board might want to re-look at this step of process in the
> future, particularly if the community asks that the Board re-examines it. I
> have suggested some revisions below for consideration. I have also included
> minor wording edits for (b) for consideration.
> >
> > The CSC notes that: a) any future work to clarify if the IANA
> Stewardship transition impacts the ccTLD delegation/transfer process will
> occur as a separate process and not as part of the processing of a ccTLD
> delegation/transfer request; and b) that removing the time incurred for
> this clarification process would still have resulted in the SLA target not
> being met for the month of February 2017.
> >
> > Trang
> >
> > On 3/14/17, 1:55 PM, "Jay Daley" <jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry to disagree but I think the point is for the CSC to note
> that it recognises this was a unique and one off situation that will not
> occur again.
> >
> > How about something like this:
> >
> > ----
> > The CSC also notes that the PTI report provides the following
> explanation for exceeding the expected SLE for this item:
> >
> > “Another factor that contributed to increased staff processing
> time was the need to clarify if the IANA Stewardship transition impacted
> the ccTLD delegation/transfer process, specifically the role of the ICANN
> Board going forward.”
> >
> > The CSC notes that a) this was a unique and one off situation
> that will not occur again; and b) that eliminating this factor would still
> have seen the target not met.
> > ----
> >
> > Jay
> >
> >> On 14/03/2017, at 1:50 PM, Feher, Kal <Kalman.Feher at neustar.biz>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Trang,
> >> I like your suggested text. I think it is worth noting in our
> report on this occasion.
> >>
> >> Kal Feher
> >> Neustar Inc. / Enterprise Architect
> >> Level 8, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Australia VIC 3004
> >> Office +61 3 9866 3710 / kal.feher at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
> >>
> >> Follow Neustar: <54033593-3099-4D83-8140-0D8157811442[15].png>
> Facebook <CD6E1201-C37D-47D2-B2EA-486E58552390[15].png> LinkedIn
> <A61F1170-9103-40BB-BDCE-E545DF2935F7[15].png> Twitter
> >> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
> for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
> have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>
> >> Date: Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 13:07
> >> To: Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz>, Kal Feher <
> kalman.feher at neustar.biz>
> >> Cc: Elaine Pruis <elaine at donuts.email>, "ICANN-CSC at icann.org" <
> ICANN-CSC at icann.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [ICANN-CSC] Draft February 2017 CSC Report
> >>
> >> Dear Kal and Jay,
> >>
> >> This point is covered in the rationale section of the PTI report,
> and there is already a sentence in the CSC report letting readers know to
> go to the PTI report for explanations of the missed SLAs. If the CSC would
> like to further highlight the rationale in the CSC report, I think we
> should use the same text for consistency. If this is the case, I would
> suggest adding the text in red below:
> >>
> >> As it relates to (b) above, the frequency with which ccTLD
> Creation/Transfer is requested is very low, in the order of one request a
> month. As a result, the CSC intends to monitor this metric for several
> months, possibly longer, in order to acquire sufficient data for an
> evidenced view on what action it should take. The CSC also notes that the
> PTI report provides the following explanation for exceeding the expected
> SLE for this item:
> >> “Another factor that contributed to increased staff processing time
> was the need to clarify if the IANA Stewardship transition impacted the
> ccTLD delegation/transfer process, specifically the role of the ICANN Board
> going forward.”
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Trang
> >>
> >> On 3/14/17, 11:09 AM, "Jay Daley" <jay at nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
> >>
> >> Good point. Noting it would be useful.
> >>
> >>> On 14/03/2017, at 10:06 AM, Feher, Kal <Kalman.Feher at neustar.biz>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I can't recall if we intended for the one-off post-transition
> delegation path uncertainty which caused some delays to be acknowledged in
> the PTI report only or in the CSC report as an additional note. I think a
> note in our report (the Feb CSC report) may be worthwhile, but not
> particularly critical.
> >>> Kal Feher
> >>> Neustar Inc. / Enterprise Architect
> >>> Level 8, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Australia VIC 3004
> >>> Office +61 3 9866 3710 / kal.feher at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
> >>>
> >>> Follow Neustar: <54033593-3099-4D83-8140-0D8157811442[7].png>
> Facebook <CD6E1201-C37D-47D2-B2EA-486E58552390[7].png> LinkedIn
> <A61F1170-9103-40BB-BDCE-E545DF2935F7[7].png> Twitter
> >>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
> for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
> have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: <icann-csc-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Elaine Pruis
> <elaine at donuts.email>
> >>> Date: Monday, 13 March 2017 at 16:20
> >>> To: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>
> >>> Cc: "ICANN-CSC at icann.org" <ICANN-CSC at icann.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [ICANN-CSC] Draft February 2017 CSC Report
> >>>
> >>> Works for me. Thanks Jay.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Trang Nguyen <
> trang.nguyen at icann.org> wrote:
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jay provided text for the additional note that the CSC agreed on
> adding to the report. Please see attached a revised version with Jay’s text
> inserted.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Trang
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>
> >>>> Date: Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 9:14 AM
> >>>> To: "ICANN-CSC at icann.org" <ICANN-CSC at icann.org>
> >>>> Subject: Draft February 2017 CSC Report
> >>>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> As agreed on the last CSC call, we have drafted the February CSC
> report ahead of the March meeting for your review and discussion. This
> document is redlined against the CSC January 2017 report, and is based on
> the PTI report that Elise circulated on 10 March.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Trang
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ICANN-CSC mailing list
> >>>> ICANN-CSC at icann.org
> >>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-csc
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Elaine Pruis, Vice President, Operations
> >>> Donuts Inc.
> >>> 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 350, Bellevue Washington, 98004, U.S.A.
> | Telephone: 509.899.3161
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ICANN-CSC mailing list
> >>> ICANN-CSC at icann.org
> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-csc
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jay Daley
> >> Chief Executive
> >> NZRS Ltd
> >> desk: +64 4 931 6977
> >> mobile: +64 21 678840
> >> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jay Daley
> > Chief Executive
> > NZRS Ltd
> > desk: +64 4 931 6977
> > mobile: +64 21 678840
> > linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> Chief Executive
> NZRS Ltd
> desk: +64 4 931 6977
> mobile: +64 21 678840
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ICANN-CSC mailing list
> ICANN-CSC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-csc
>
--
[image: Donuts Inc.] <http://www.donuts.domains>
*Elaine Pruis*, Vice President, Operations
*Donuts Inc. <http://www.donuts.domains>*
10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 350, Bellevue Washington, 98004, U.S.A. |
Telephone: 509.899.3161
[image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/DonutsInc>[image: Facebook]
<https://www.facebook.com/donutstlds>[image: Linked In]
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/donuts-inc->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-csc/attachments/20170315/2218ed5b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ICANN-CSC
mailing list