[ICANN-CSC] [EXT] Re: CSC Meeting 30: Recording, Notes, & Chat
Naela Sarras
naela.sarras at iana.org
Mon Jun 10 21:08:25 UTC 2019
Hi Allan,
Thanks for your feedback on the document. I will refrain from making any changes until we have our discussion on Wednesday given that the meeting is in two days.
I agree we need to decide what documents we want to be consistent with and let’s see how the discussion goes on Wednesday.
For your question about the designation of ‘Validation of Reviews after each submission’, what we are talking about here is changing the definition of what is measured. The original SLA measured the full time staff spent on validation and reviews. In this proposed change, we are suggesting that we focus on time spent on this activity after each submission. I think that you are right though, that is more accurately characterized as metrics to focus on under this SLA category.
Best regards,
Naela
From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>
Date: Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:24 PM
To: Kim Davies <kim.davies at iana.org>
Cc: Naela Sarras <naela.sarras at iana.org>, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes at icann.org>, "ICANN-CSC at icann.org" <ICANN-CSC at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [ICANN-CSC] [EXT] Re: CSC Meeting 30: Recording, Notes, & Chat
Kim - it’s just a question of which documents one wants to be consistent with.
Allan
Sent with BlackBerry Work
(www.blackberry.com)
From: Kim Davies <kim.davies at iana.org>
Date: Friday, Jun 07, 2019, 1:43 PM
To: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>
Cc: Naela Sarras <naela.sarras at iana.org>, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes at icann.org>, ICANN-CSC at icann.org <ICANN-CSC at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ICANN-CSC] [EXT] Re: CSC Meeting 30: Recording, Notes, & Chat
Hi Allan,
Quoting Allan MacGillivray on Friday June 07, 2019:
> But one very general one is that the ccTLD community is very, very particular about terminology and for them, the reference document is the Final Report of the Framework of Interpretation Working Group’. I recommend that you stick to the terminology therein which refers to ccTLD ‘delegations and transfers’, rather than ‘creations/transfers’. I think that we can avoid some comments if Bart were to closely review the first paragraph in the background section to ensure that PTI is not seen to be deviating from establish orthodoxy.
I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I would note that terminology
is not something new that is being introduced with this document - the
lineage dates at least to the community's transition proposal that
informed the SLAs. The "SLE Working Group Report on Service Level
Expectation for IANA Root Zone Management (Post-Transition)", from what
was known as Design Team A, reads:
Category III (Creating or Transferring a gTLD)—Requests to
create (“delegate”) or transfer (“redelegate” or “assign”) a generic
top-level domain. These changes require additional processing by IANA
to ensure policy and contractual requirements are met associated
with a change of control for the TLD. While the key processing is
performed elsewhere within ICANN, the IANA processing is significant
and therefore distinguishes this type of request from a routine change
request.
Category IV (Creating or Transferring a ccTLD)—Requests to
create or transfer a country-code top-level domain. These changes
require additional processing by IANA to ensure policy requirements are
met. This processing is performed by IANA staff, and includes performing
additional analysis on the change request, producing a report, and
having that report reviewed externally(including verification that all
existing registration data has been successfully transferred from the
old to new Registry operator). This processing is significant, and
is normally substantially longer than a routine change request, and
therefore should be distinguished.
kim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-csc/attachments/20190610/7c1015c8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4588 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-csc/attachments/20190610/7c1015c8/smime.p7s>
More information about the ICANN-CSC
mailing list