[IDN-WG] Re : REMINDER/ IDN WG Meeting 09:30 - 11am

Thu Mar 15 15:30:59 UTC 2012

Confirming my participation. JJS.

Envoyé depuis mon HTC

----- Reply message -----
De : "Gisella Gruber" <Gisella.Gruber at icann.org>
Date : jeu., mars 15, 2012 22:23
Objet : [IDN-WG] REMINDER/ IDN WG Meeting 09:30 - 11am
Pour : "Gisella Gruber" <Gisella.Gruber at icann.org>, "Edmon Chung" <edmon at isoc.hk>, "Sivasubramanian Muthusamy" <isolatedn at gmail.com>
Cc : "idn-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <idn-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>

REMINDER for the IDN WG Meeting this morning.

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Gisella

On 13/03/2012 21:31, "Gisella Gruber" <Gisella.Gruber at icann.org> wrote:

>Dear Edmon and Working Group Members,
>
>Girasol Room (by the pool) is available from 09:30 to 11:00am on Thursday
>morning. Please note HARD STOP at 11am as the room is occupied from 11am
>onwards.
>
>NO AUDIO VISUAL will be available.
>
>Thank you.
>Kind regards,
>Gisella
>
>On 13/03/2012 17:58, "Edmon Chung" <edmon at isoc.hk> wrote:
>
>>I believe Jean-Jacques, Rinalia and Tijani can also make the time.
>>
>>Edmon
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>>From: Sivasubramanian M [mailto:isolatedn at gmail.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:40 AM
>>To: Edmon Chung
>>Cc: idn-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] meeting again Thu 9:30-11am [RE: response on VIP
>>Project plan]
>>
>> 
>>
>>Dear Edmon
>>
>> 
>>
>>Will attend this meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Edmon Chung <edmon at isoc.hk> wrote:
>>
>>Hi Everyone,
>>
>>Based on the feedback and discussions we had with the VIP team during our
>>Monday session, I was hoping we could try to meet up further this week to
>>prepare our response to the VIP Project plan.
>>
>>Looking at the agenda, would like to suggest:
>>Thursday, March 15
>>9:30 - 11am
>>
>>I wonder if the time may work for most people...
>>
>>In the meantime, I will also prepare some notes highlighting the core
>>issues of the project plan based on the feedback from the group so far
>>and circulate it to the list by Wednesday night (probably late night or
>>very early am Thu).
>>
>>In our Monday meeting, we suggested for the extension of the public
>>comment period as well as setting up a webminar to allow for At-Large to
>>better understand the issues as well. Would like to talk further about
>>that as well if we could meet Thursday.
>>
>>Edmon
>>
>>
>>PS. Also, ALAC staff team, I wonder if any signup rooms may be available
>>at that time.  We should not need other support.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: idn-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>[mailto:idn-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
>>Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:23 AM
>>To: idn-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>Subject: [IDN-WG] response on VIP Project plan
>>
>>Hi Everyone,
>>
>>Here is a very brief skeleton for discussion of our response to the VIP
>>Project Plan 
>>(http://www.icann.org/en/resources/idn/idn-vip-proposed-project-plan-20fe
>>b
>>12-en.pdf):
>>
>>1. General ALAC Position
>>       - reiterate our support for IDN and IDN Variants
>>       - reiterate IDN's importance on multilingualism, etc.
>>       - reiterate our concerns for continued delay on the implementation
>>of IDN Variant TLDs
>>       - ...
>>
>>2. Budget & Process
>>       - Previous ALAC comment from FY13
>>https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31166974/ALAC+Statement+
>>o
>>n+the+Framework+for+the+FY+13+Budget.pdf?version=2
>><https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31166974/ALAC+Statement
>>+
>>on+the+Framework+for+the+FY+13+Budget.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1331
>>3
>>27978359> &modificationDate=1331327978359
>>       - transparency of process for which the budget for VIP was
>>developed
>>       - explanation on consultants vs. volunteers (was the original VIP
>>results not satisfactory?)
>>       - ...
>>
>>3. ALAC Concerns
>>       - lack of clarity or clear need on some projects (project 3)
>>       - theoretic/grandiose approach (projects 1&2) versus practical
>>implementation (spirit of the Internet)
>>       - need to better distinguish issues not specific to IDN Variant
>>TLDs (project 4)
>>       - out of scope for ICANN (project 5)
>>       - cart before the horse (project 6)
>>
>>4. ALAC Advice
>>       - concentrate efforts to implement IDN Variant TLDs for
>>communities who are ready
>>       - leverage already available expertise and experience from the
>>community
>>       - direct funding to other IDN communities to support the bottom-up
>>development of IDN policies from the language community
>>       - refocus on ICANN Scope (projects 7 & 8)
>>       - ...
>>
>>Feel free to start the discussion on this mailing list and we will
>>continue at our meeting on Monday
>>(http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29525)
>>
>>Edmon
>>
>>
>>PS. If it is agreeable, would also like to invite the VIP team to our
>>discussion
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IDN-WG mailing list
>>IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
>>
>>IDN WG Wiki: 
>>https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IDN-WG mailing list
>>IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
>>
>>IDN WG Wiki: 
>>https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy
>>
>> 
>>
>>_______________________________________________