[IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process

[Edmon]

In the last round of public comments, a few from this group had some comments on the issue of confusingly similar string.  I wonder if they need to be raised again... perhaps those who raised it can provide further input..
Edmon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: idn-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:idn-wg-
> bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: JJS
> Cc: No name
> Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
> 
> Dear Jean-Jacques,
> 
> It is an important concern.  Perhaps Cheryl Langdon-Orr (ALAC Liaison to the
> ccNSO) has some thoughts regarding what opportunities and mechanism exists
> within the ccNSO processes where the ALAC could/should intervene to ensure
> that the system remains fair and open.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Rinalia
> 
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, JJS <jjs.global at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > *Dear Rinalia,*
> > *
> > *
> > *thank you for drawing attention to this. Having had an indirect
> > connection with ccNSO matters (as Chair of the ccNSO Review), I'd like
> > to offer 2 comments:*
> > *
> > *
> > *- At this stage, I don't have any definitive view about whether there
> > should be an ALAC response or not. The nature of the issue will
> > certainly cause many people to leave comments, and these may or may
> > not include a vigorous defense of the global public interest. If the
> > latter were lacking, or insufficient, then ALAC should step in.*
> > *
> > *
> > *- I'd like to make sure that the system remains open and fair, for
> > instance between states sharing the same language(s), e.g. Arabic or
> > Chinese. The issue is not unlike the one in the IDN Variants debate,
> > where there was a tendency for certain states to claim (and act as if)
> > a language or a script was theirs alone, forcing others to accept
> > their national norms. It's quite possible that this problem may not
> > arise, or that it has been settled. Do you share my concern?*
> > *
> > *
> > *Best regards,*
> > *Jean-Jacques.
> > *
> > 2013/2/6 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>
> >
> >> Dear IDN Working Group,
> >>
> >> A public comment period is now open on IDN ccNSO Policy Development
> >> Process (Interim Report). Please indicate if you think there should
> >> be an ALAC response to this document.
> >>
> >> Regarding the Final Report on User Experience related to the
> >> activation of IDN variant TLDs, if after the webinar scheduled on 13
> >> February you feel that there should be a response on this issue, please flag
> it immediately.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> >>
> >> sent via galaxy tab
> >>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> >> Date: 6 Feb 2013 07:20
> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Interim Report IDN
> >> ccNSO Policy Development Process
> >> To: "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
> >> alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> >>
> >>
> >> [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/>
> >> News Alert
> >>
> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb13-
> en.ht
> >> m
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Interim Report IDN ccNSO Policy Development Process
> >>
> >> 5 February 2013
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Forum Announcement:     Comment Period Opens on Date:   5 February
> 2013
> >> Categories/Tags:
> >>
> >>  *   Top-Level Domains
> >>  *   Policy Processes
> >>
> >>
> >> Purpose (Brief):        In the framework of the ccNSO Policy Development
> >> Process on IDN ccTLD's the purpose of the Interim Report<
> >> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idn-ccpdp-interim-04feb13-en.pdf
> >> > [PDF, 556 KB] is to report on and seek feed-back on feasible
> >> recommendations for overall policy for the selection of IDN country
> >> code Top Level Domains strings (IDN ccTLD's) and the inclusion of IDN
> >> ccTLD managers in the ccNSO. The Interim Report builds on the Final
> >> Paper's of IDN ccPDP Working Groups 1 and 2, which have been open for
> public comment.
> >> Public Comment Box Link:
> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-ccpdp-05feb13-
> en.htm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This message was sent to matt.ashtiani at icann.org<mailto:
> >> matt.ashtiani at icann.org> from:
> >>
> >> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> >>
> >>
> >> Email Marketing by
> >> [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif]
> >> <
> >> http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
> >>
> >>
> >> Manage Your Subscription <
> >>
> >> http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-
> mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA
> >> 3&m=904926&c=165637
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ALAC-Announce mailing list
> >> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
> >>
> >> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IDN-WG mailing list
> >> IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
> >>
> >> IDN WG Wiki:
> >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IDN-WG mailing list
> IDN-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg
> 
> IDN WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-
> Large+IDN+Policy
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2897 / Virus Database: 2639/6085 - Release Date: 02/06/13