[Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

[Tan Tanaka, Dennis]

Sarmad,

The traceability matrix looks fine to me.

A couple of observations from my review:

1.       We didn’t review appendices A and B from v3. I think we should spend some time discussing whether a revised version or removal is warranted, or nothing at all. Of course, if we do include additional information into the draft this would mean another public comment period.

2.       In recommendation 13 we refer to a lot of documents and we probably want to be very specific as to which sections of those documents are relevant to the guidelines. I believe we need to be very specific in references since this document is binding for gTLDS.

I’m ok with resuming the calls next week at 10:00 am UTC but if you want to do a doddle poll, that’s fine with me as well.

Thanks,
Dennis

From: <idngwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 1:55 AM
To: "idngwg at icann.org" <idngwg at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

Dear All,

I wanted to follow up with all of you on this thread.  Kindly review the attached document and let me know if you have any feedback.  We should finalize it to allow to respond to the query below.  I would suggest that we post the final version of this document on our wiki page so that we can point others to the same document.

Please also advise when you would like to continue our fortnightly meetings (now? After public comments?).  Should we use the same time (in UTC) or change is following the daylight savings time changes in some countries.

Regards
Sarmad


From: idngwg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain
Sent: Wednesday, 8 March, 2017 5:46 PM
To: idngwg at icann.org
Subject: [Idngwg] FW: [Ext] Re: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

Thanks Dennis.

All,

Please find attached a first cut for a traceability matrix.  Please feel free to suggest if we want a different approach or if there are any suggestions on the content.

Should we include it as an appendix to the next draft we produce or share separately?

Also, please review the contents and let me know if you agree with the analysis or have any suggested changes.

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka at verisign.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 7:47 PM
To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain at icann.org>>; idngwg at icann.org<mailto:idngwg at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

My preference is option #2.

-Dennis

From: <idngwg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:idngwg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 12:32 AM
To: "idngwg at icann.org<mailto:idngwg at icann.org>" <idngwg at icann.org<mailto:idngwg at icann.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Idngwg] FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

Dear IDNGWG members

Kindly see the enquiry below.  We have not created a redline comparison with previous version, as there are significant new additions in the revised version.  There are at least three options:


1.       We create a redline version and release it

2.       Create a traceability matrix with summary of which guidelines were retained, changed, dropped or added in the next version

3.       State that the version is significantly different and thus such an analysis is not been performed (not preferred)

I will proceed as you suggest, and respond to Yasmin accordingly.

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Omer, Yasmin
Sent: Tuesday, 7 March, 2017 4:22 AM
To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org<mailto:sarmad.hussain at icann.org>>
Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines Redline

Hi Sarmad,

Is there a redline of the new IDN Implementation Guidelines against the previous version?

Thanks,

Yasmin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/idngwg/attachments/20170322/b8614b99/attachment-0001.html>