[Idngwg] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] Re: Update draft + PC2 call + ICANN 60 presentations

Thu Oct 19 03:03:41 UTC 2017

I am ok with the latest version.

satish

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Feher, Kal via Idngwg <idngwg at icann.org>
wrote:

> I'm fine with the latest version.
>
> *Kal Feher*
>
> *Neustar Inc.*
> Level 8, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Australia VIC 3004
>
> *Office* +61 3 9866 3710 / kal.feher at team.neustar / www.neustar.biz
>
> *Follow Neustar:*   [image:
> http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture.png] *Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>*   *[image:
> http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(1)(1).png]*
>  *LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>*   *[image:
> http://neunet.neustar.biz/sites/default/files/295/New%20Picture%20(2).png]*
>  *Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/neustarinc>*
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
> From: <idngwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <
> sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
> Date: Thursday, 19 October 2017 at 07:56
> To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka at verisign.com>, "idngwg at icann.org" <
> idngwg at icann.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: Update draft + PC2 call +
> ICANN 60 presentations
>
> Dear WG members,
>
>
>
> We have not heard back from other members.
>
>
>
> Please advise if we are ready to proceed with the public comment
> announcement or you would need more time for review.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
> *From:* idngwg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces at icann.org
> <idngwg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Sarmad Hussain
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:45 AM
> *To:* Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka at verisign.com>; idngwg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Idngwg] [Ext] Re: Update draft + PC2 call + ICANN 60
> presentations
>
>
>
> Thank you Dennis and sorry for the confusion caused due to the two
> versions.
>
>
>
> I have taken the version with your feedback and added the PC2 paragraph in
> the beginning to represent the complete document.
>
>
>
> I am attaching the latest version which we will take forward.
>
>
>
> I will incorporate any feedback sent in by others on this or any of the
> earlier versions circulated.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to any final feedback.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
> *From:* Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka at verisign.com
> <dtantanaka at verisign.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:17 AM
> *To:* Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org>; idngwg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Ext] Re: [Idngwg] Update draft + PC2 call + ICANN 60
> presentations
>
>
>
> Sarmad,
>
>
>
> I did minor edits to the version enclosed, then I noticed there was
> another version with the added PC2 paragraph (i.e. nic chile and “x”
> question). I’m good with this addition.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
> *From: *<idngwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <
> sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:44 AM
> *To: *"idngwg at icann.org" <idngwg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [Idngwg] Update draft + PC2 call + ICANN 60
> presentations
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> In drafting the explanation for “uniform” in Guideline 13 in the
> Additional Note II, we should consider another scenario not yet captured
> but needed in the uniform treatment of variants across the IDN Tables.
>
>
>
> Thus, I have suggested additional text in the Additional Note II (ii) in
> the updated version 2.9-redline attached.
>
>
>
> As an explanation, consider the scenario:
>
>
>
> Suppose a registry creates two IDN Tables, one exclusively for Traditional
> Chinese and other exclusively for Simplified Chinese.  If the additional
> text is not there the registry could potentially allocate the TC and SC
> versions of labels to different registrants.  With the proposed text, the
> variant code points will need to be reviewed for both SC and TC together so
> even with such IDN Tables, the variant labels for SC and TC will go to the
> same registrant.
>
>
>
> The same case can occur in Arabic script.  If we have Arabic Kaf (‘k’ كU+0643)
> in Arabic language table and Persian Kaf (‘k’ کU+06A9) in Persian
> language table, then the identical labels کتابandكتاب (kitab – book)
> could be allocated to different registrants.  If these are harmonized to be
> uniform, as described, such cases will be prevented.
>
>
>
> This case does not seem to be captured elsewhere in the guidelines.  I
> think this was originally intended, but when we specified the definition of
> “uniform”, we did not capture this part.
>
>
>
> Kindly see if this version 2.9 is agreeable to proceed (with any further
> edits suggested) or should we take version 2.8 further.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*idngwg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces at icann.org
> <idngwg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Sarmad Hussain
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 15, 2017 1:11 PM
> *To:* idngwg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Idngwg] Update draft + PC2 call + ICANN 60 presentations
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the amazing work all of you have done in finalizing the
> Guidelines document!
>
>
>
> As discussed, we will conduct a second public comment on this document.
>
>
>
> Following the IDNGWG meeting on 12 October, please find attached the
> following:
>
>
>
> 1.      Call for second public comment (PC2)
>
> 2.      Updated draft of the guidelines (updated redline version + PC2
> clean version)
>
> 3.      Updated ICANN 60 presentations (detailed for 90 min session on 29
> Oct. + short for 7 minute update on 1 Nov.)
>
>
>
> (corresponding PDF versions also attached on request)
>
>
>
> I have added only two specific questions at the top of the guidelines
> document: one on scope and other on value of X.  Kindly confirm that these
> are Ok, and please share if you would like to add any additional specific
> questions?
>
>
>
> As discussed, second public comment call and corresponding document will
> be sent in for publication on 18 October, so please share any *feedback
> before 0500 UTC 18 Oct* (please make changes directly in the documents).
> It will be useful to get your confirmation even if you do not have any
> suggested changes.
>
>
>
> As usual, the recording of the call is available at the wiki page
> https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines[
> community.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_IDN_IDN-2BImplementation-2BGuidelines&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=KTETvEaGPwPcawI-QmNa-kiv-ZBvdgyyLm-mxd028M4&m=psZrPi04OpZy2zYuUYGSomCxurkdBugJeqIN31z4UUc&s=SRrRz2lBwei_6_lLDzFWZdrAv06f9FrzPDZr-kbBOqg&e=>
> and the notes will also be available there soon.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idngwg mailing list
> Idngwg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idngwg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/idngwg/attachments/20171019/f7cfe461/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CD6E1201-C37D-47D2-B2EA-486E58552390[12].png
Type: image/png
Size: 728 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/idngwg/attachments/20171019/f7cfe461/CD6E1201-C37D-47D2-B2EA-486E5855239012-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 54033593-3099-4D83-8140-0D8157811442[12].png
Type: image/png
Size: 775 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/idngwg/attachments/20171019/f7cfe461/54033593-3099-4D83-8140-0D815781144212-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: A61F1170-9103-40BB-BDCE-E545DF2935F7[12].png
Type: image/png
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/idngwg/attachments/20171019/f7cfe461/A61F1170-9103-40BB-BDCE-E545DF2935F712-0001.png>