[Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?

[joseph alhadeff]

Colleagues:

If we are thinking of public events, may I suggest that we consider also 
drafting a status update or brief statement of position to be read at or 
distributed for the IANA transition panel at IGF?  I would hate that our 
first public pronouncement come again along the margins of a ICANN 
event...  Perhaps a couple of us could work on that in advance of the 
August call for the consideration of the group?

Joe
On 8/1/2014 4:17 AM, WUKnoben wrote:
> Patrik,
>
> as usual, you are far more structured in thinking ahead...
>
> I fully agree on how you see a public session, inparticular the 
> exchange with the other "interested groups". So definitely I see here 
> a need for 90 mins.
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Patrik Fältström
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:34 AM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: ICG
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg