[Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?

[Jon Nevett]

Agree with Patrik on structure and length.  Best, Jon


On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:34 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> 
> On 1 aug 2014, at 03:27, jari.arkko at piuha.net wrote:
> 
>> We should have a session.
>> 
>> I think 60 minutes is enough for the CG part.
>> 
>> But I'm wondering if there should also be "this is what is happening at
>> IETF (etc)"? Or is it too early? Maybe not, we know the process and it is
>> ongoing even if the result is not there yet...
> 
> We have I think three possible contents for an ICG session:
> 
> 1. ICG present where we are, what we will do next.
> 
> 2. Feedback from community to ICG (including Q&A), i.e. "open mike"
> 
> 3. "Invitation" to other groups to come and present what is happening (IETF, RIRs, GNSO, ccNSO etc)
> 
> To some degree I think we need all three.
> 
> It is VERY important we do not loose anyone, so taking for granted the community know where we are is dangerous. Specifically given the "misunderstandings" I see on various mailing lists. So 1 is important.
> 
> I also think 2 is important. I.e. "why not"?
> 
> 3 might also be important to cross feed information from these groups to the community (not so much to ICG).
> 
> Proposal:
> 
> 1: 15 min
> 3: 10 min for each group that want to present
> 2: Whatever is left of 90 minutes
> 
>   Patrik
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg