[Internal-cg] Charter commenting

Alissa Cooper alissa at cooperw.in
Fri Aug 8 19:10:42 UTC 2014

Hi Kavouss,

On 8/8/14, 11:52 AM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alice,
> thank you for immediate reply,
> But Still  we need to provide more time for comments unless you believe that
> only ICG Members are eligible to comment

Anyone is eligible to comment, that’s why we’re setting up the public forum.

> Pls priovide me a brief on comments you have received outside the ICG and
> outside constituency of ICANN. i.e from the community

I was thinking of the whole thread at [1]. I’m sure those who are actually
in favor of a public comment process (Mohamed?) could provide additional
details about the people they expect to see comments from.


[1] http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ianatransition/2014/001194.html

> Regards
> Kavouss 
> 2014-08-08 20:44 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>> Hi Kavouss,
>> The charter has been publicly available for three weeks, it is not a long
>> document, and there has already been community interest in it. What we are
>> providing here is a mechanism for people who have looked at the charter to
>> send us their comments, some of which they have already formulated. So even
>> with one more week, people will have had four weeks to take the charter in
>> and formulate their thoughts about it.
>> The charter is in some sense gating on other work we have before us, which is
>> why I think everyone wants to get it done.
>> Also, we’re asking for major objections. I think receiving few comments
>> should be viewed as success, not failure.
>> Alissa  
>> On 8/8/14, 11:35 AM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> Yes ,we can move, but one week deadline for comments is really too short.
>>> Why we are in hurry.
>>> By the way,it is August and some people still on leave,knowing that I did
>>> not take any leave besing fully occupied with extensive exchange of e-mails
>>> with other ICG .
>>> Please kindly take intoaccount the French proverb" VITE FAIT, MAL FAIT"
>>> I suggest minimum 15 days for deadline
>>> Pls kindly be pateint, prudent,comprehensive.
>>> Even within 15 DAYS YOU MAY RECEIVE FEW COMMENTS ,all from ourown.s
>>> Regards
>>> 2014-08-08 20:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>>> Okay, let’s move ahead with this. I had a side conversation with Milton
>>>> and I think we’re all roughly okay with moving forward.
>>>> If we get this posted today, we can make the deadline next Friday (one
>>>> week), and we can give Jari the weekend to come up with a possibly revised
>>>> charter for discussion on our August 19 call. I know this is not ideal —
>>>> short window, Friday deadline — but I think we better move forward.
>>>> Alice, please get this text posted to its own web page and send us the
>>>> link:
>>>> ===
>>>> ICG Charter Open for Public Comments
>>>> On July 18, the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)
>>>> produced a draft charter <link> that defines its own tasks. The ICG views
>>>> defining the broad outlines of its charter as important, but it views
>>>> finalizing the charter and moving on to the real work of the transition
>>>> planning to be of equal importance. Thus the ICG is opening up a short
>>>> public comment period on the charter to determine if there are any major
>>>> objections to the current draft that the ICG has not already taken into
>>>> account.
>>>> The charter is open for public comment until August 15, 2014 at 23:59 UTC.
>>>> Public comments are considered to be for the public record, and for the
>>>> information and consideration of all participants in this process, not
>>>> just for the ICG. Everyone is encouraged to review any public comments
>>>> that may be submitted via the process below.
>>>> Public comment submission process links:
>>>> Comment submission: <link>
>>>> List of comments submitted via this site: <link>
>>>> Charter: <link>
>>>> Deadline: August 15, 2014 at 23:59 UTC
>>>> ===
>>>> On 8/8/14, 12:40 AM, "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >I am in favor of moving ahead as Alissa suggests. The text is fine.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I am also in favor of having a permanent comment mechanism, but that is
>>>>> >secondary to moving ahead with receiving comments about the charter.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >We need to get the charter squared away.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Daniel
>>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>>> >Internal-cg mailing list
>>>>> >Internal-cg at icann.org
>>>>> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140808/b6e22bbd/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list