[Internal-cg] issues tracking table RE: Chair responsibilities

[Narelle Clark]

The distribution of tasks also makes sense to me.

I'd like also to reiterate the concept of maintaining a table to track issues somewhere as the signal to noise ratio on the list is less than ideal.


Narelle

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
> Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2014 5:09 PM
> To: Daniel Karrenberg
> Cc: ICG
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chair responsibilities
> 
> Indeed, thanks Alissa - this approach makes a lot of sense and is very clear.
> 
> No comments from me, except that I expect plenty of work items to come
> along in future, and it may be worthwhile to maintain a table on the
> website to track these (rather than posting email updates).  That could
> document not only the responsibilities of the chairs but also the tasks
> assigned to ICG members.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> ______________
> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net>
> http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100
> 
> See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 Aug 2014, at 2:38 pm, Daniel Karrenberg
> <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> > Alissa,
> >
> > Thank you for sharing this. It is encouraging to see that our chairs
> > are moving right along. Your way of organising yourselves looks very
> > reasonable to me. I am sure Patrik can deal with the fact that as an
> > ICG member he expressed a strong opinion about secretariat matters. As
> > we agreed in London the chairs should not be restrained to argue their
> > point of view as a member of the group.
> >
> > I also appreciate the clarity of your paragraph about email
> > expectations. I just hope that this does not encourage a lot of
> > private communications with the chairs. My perception so far has been
> > that we all agree that communications about our work should be visible
> > to all members of the group and above board. I expect from the chairs
> > that you will actively push back if matters of substance are
> > communicated to you privately.
> >
> > Daniel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg