[Internal-cg] issues tracking table RE: Chair responsibilities

[Alissa Cooper]

Hi Narelle,

We have the action items list
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/ha6xg9m68wlq4bi/Action%20items.xlsx> that we
can try to keep up-to-date, but I wasn’t under the impression that people
were using it much.

Alissa

On 8/21/14, 12:46 AM, "Narelle Clark" <narelle.clark at accan.org.au> wrote:

>The distribution of tasks also makes sense to me.
>
>I'd like also to reiterate the concept of maintaining a table to track
>issues somewhere as the signal to noise ratio on the list is less than
>ideal.
>
>
>Narelle
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
>> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
>> Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2014 5:09 PM
>> To: Daniel Karrenberg
>> Cc: ICG
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chair responsibilities
>> 
>> Indeed, thanks Alissa - this approach makes a lot of sense and is very
>>clear.
>> 
>> No comments from me, except that I expect plenty of work items to come
>> along in future, and it may be worthwhile to maintain a table on the
>> website to track these (rather than posting email updates).  That could
>> document not only the responsibilities of the chairs but also the tasks
>> assigned to ICG members.
>> 
>> Paul.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net>
>> http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100
>> 
>> See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 21 Aug 2014, at 2:38 pm, Daniel Karrenberg
>> <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
>> 
>> > Alissa,
>> >
>> > Thank you for sharing this. It is encouraging to see that our chairs
>> > are moving right along. Your way of organising yourselves looks very
>> > reasonable to me. I am sure Patrik can deal with the fact that as an
>> > ICG member he expressed a strong opinion about secretariat matters. As
>> > we agreed in London the chairs should not be restrained to argue their
>> > point of view as a member of the group.
>> >
>> > I also appreciate the clarity of your paragraph about email
>> > expectations. I just hope that this does not encourage a lot of
>> > private communications with the chairs. My perception so far has been
>> > that we all agree that communications about our work should be visible
>> > to all members of the group and above board. I expect from the chairs
>> > that you will actively push back if matters of substance are
>> > communicated to you privately.
>> >
>> > Daniel
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Internal-cg mailing list
>> > Internal-cg at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg